Skip to main content

Automated Threat Modeling Approaches: Comparison of Open Source Tools

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC 2022)

Abstract

The software systems of modern architectures are characterized by high heterogeneity and by the use of a model that delegates the control of individual components to third parties, making these systems more vulnerable to cyber-attacks. As a consequence, best practices, such as the Security-by-Design development methodologies, suggest taking into account security all over the systems life cycle, starting from the very early stages (e.g. from initial requirement analysis). Thus, one of the most relevant practices is Threat Modeling (TM), i.e. the activity devoted to identifying the possible threats that may affect the system. According to most security-related best practices, TM should be done as early as possible, in order to help in the requirement elicitation. Threat Modeling is a complex activity, that requires security experts with consolidated skills, able to predict and anticipate the possible issues: as a consequence, it is a costly activity, both in terms of time and money. Due to the continuous need of enforcing security, the effect of new regulation and the wide diffusion of ICT systems, there is a recent growth of tools and techniques that support and aims at automatizing Threat modelling activities. This work illustrates the approach adopted by our research team and compares the results of our technique with two other existing tools, in order to offer a brief overview of the state of the art of threat modelling automation techniques and of state of art limits and open research topics. It is worth noting that our comparison does not aims at being complete and focuses only on open tools (or on their free/community version), but offers a basis for understanding the progress of security automation processes in terms of threat modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/DanieleGranata94/SlaGenerator.

  2. 2.

    Full threat modelling comparison is available on request.

References

  1. Microsoft threat modeling tool (2018). https://docs.microsoft.com/it-it/azure/security/develop/threat-modeling-tool

  2. Abela, R.: Statistics show why WordPress is a popular hacker target (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ansari, M.T., Pandey, D., Alenezi, M.: STORE: security threat oriented requirements engineering methodology (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arsac, W., Bella, G., Chantry, X., Compagna, L.: Multi-attacker protocol validation. J. Autom. Reason. 46(3–4), 353–388 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhattacharya, D.: OWASP threat dragon review (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casola, V., Benedictis, A.D., Rak, M., Villano, U.: Preliminary design of a platform-as-a-service to provide security in cloud. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science - CLOSER, pp. 752–757 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Casola, V., De Benedictis, A., Rak, M., Rios, E.: Security-by-design in clouds: a security-SLA driven methodology to build secure cloud applications. Procedia Comput. Sci. 97, 53–62 (2016). 2nd International Conference on Cloud Forward: From Distributed to Complete Computing

    Google Scholar 

  8. Casola, V., De Benedictis, A., Rak, M., Villano, U.: Toward the automation of threat modeling and risk assessment in IoT systems. Internet Things 7, 100056 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Drake: Threat Modeling. https://owasp.org/www-community/Threat_Modeling

  10. Frydman, M., Ruiz, G., Heymann, E., César, E., Miller, B.P.: Automating risk analysis of software design models. Sci. World J. 2014, 805856 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goodwin, M.: OWASP Threat Dragon. https://github.com/owasp/threat-dragon/releases

  12. Granata, D., Rak, M.: Design and development of a technique for the automation of the risk analysis process in IT Security, p. 14 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joint Task Force Interagency Working Group: Security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations. NIST (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kornecki, A.J., Janusz, Z.: Threat modeling for aviation computer security. CrossTalk 28, 21–27 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Musman, S., Turner, A.J.: A game oriented approach to minimizing cybersecurity risk. Saf. Secur. Stud. 8, 212–222 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. OWASP: OWASP Automated Threats to Web Applications (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. OWASP: Threat Modeling Manifesto. https://www.threatmodelingmanifesto.org/

  18. Rak, M., Salzillo, G., Granata, D.: EssecA: an automated expert system for threat modelling and penetration testing for IoT ecosystems. Comput. Electr. Eng. 99, 107721 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schaad, A., Borozdin, M.: TAM: automated threat analysis. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2012, pp. 1103–1108. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Singh, S., Tu, H., Allanach, J., Areta, J., Willett, P., Pattipati, K.: Modeling threats. IEEE Potentials 23(3), 18–21 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tatam, M., Shanmugam, B., Azam, S., Kannoorpatti, K.: A review of threat modelling approaches for apt-style attacks. Heliyon 7(1), e05969 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Xiong, W., Lagerström, R.: Threat modeling - a systematic literature review. Comput. Secur. 84, 53–69 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Granata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Granata, D., Rak, M., Salzillo, G. (2022). Automated Threat Modeling Approaches: Comparison of Open Source Tools. In: Vallecillo, A., Visser, J., Pérez-Castillo, R. (eds) Quality of Information and Communications Technology. QUATIC 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14179-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14179-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14178-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14179-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics