Skip to main content

Periphery and Process: Tracing Adaptation Through Screenplays

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Scandal of Adaptation

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture ((PSADVC))

Abstract

The screenwriting process, by means of which adaptation occurs and through which adaptations are created, is restricted to a marginal niche within the already marginalized field of adaptation studies. This process is a fundamental and essential component in film adaptations, yet it is too often ignored in our scholarship. This chapter, which considers screenwriting’s formative role in the process of film adaptation, calls for much greater attention to it within adaptation studies. It uses Billy Wilder’s Double Indemnity (1944) and John Huston’s The Man Who Would Be King (1975) to illustrate how screenwriters approach adaptation and how multiple variant drafts document and record the incremental, creative, and fluid process of adaptation. These documents can deepen and even transform our understanding of movies and adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A Double Indemnity script dated 25 November 1943 was published by the University of California Press in 2000 with an introduction by Jeffrey Meyers. A script for The Man Who Would Be King dated 15 November 1974 has also been published, but that facsimile printing does not list a press or publication date.

  2. 2.

    At this stage the characters used Cain’s names, but their surnames were eventually changed in the film to Walter Neff and Phyllis Dietrichson. The archives establish when and why those changes occurred. There was a Walter Huff listed in the Los Angeles phone book, and moreover he was an insurance salesman, so to protect the studio from possible lawsuits, the Paramount legal office instructed the screenwriters to change his surname (which they did by 11 October). There was also a single Nirdlinger household in the LA city directory, so the lawyers required a name change for Phyllis too. A memo dated 24 September approved Dietrichson from a list of names Wilder submitted (Paramount 100.f-1264).

References

  • Acheson, Keith, and Christopher J. Maule. “Understanding Hollywood’s Organisation and Continuing Success.” An Economic History of Film. Edited by John Sedgwick and Michael Pokorny, Routledge, 2005, pp. 312–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balázs, Béla. Theory of the Film; Character and Growth of a New Art, Dover, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batt, Bert. Production memo to John Huston et al. John Huston Papers, Margaret Herrick Library, 32-f.305, 8 Nov. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, Daniel, and Julian Hoxter. Off the Page: Screenwriting in the Era of Media Convergence, U of California P, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, Kevin Alexander. Script Culture and the American Screenplay, Wayne State UP, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boozer, Jack, editor. Authorship in Film Adaptation, U of Texas P, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David, et al. The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960, Columbia UP, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corliss, Richard. Talking Pictures: Screenwriters in the American Cinema, Overlook, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Gary. “Rejected Offspring: The Screenplay as a Literary Genre.” New Orleans Review, vol. 11, no. 2, 1984, pp. 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Double Indemnity. Directed by Billy Wilder, performed by Fred MacMurray and Barbara Stanwyck, Paramount, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, Andrew, and Julian Hoxter. Screenwriting, Rutgers UP, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, John. The Man Who Would Be King Correspondence. John Huston Papers, Margaret Herrick Library, 31-f.299, 6 Feb. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, John. An Open Book, Knopf, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, John, and Gladys Hill. John Hustons The Man Who Would Be King [screenplay]. N.p., 1974a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, John, and Gladys Hill. Script for The Man Who Would Be King. John Huston Papers, Margaret Herrick Library, 30-f.288, 5 June 1974b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda, with Siobhan O’Flynn. A Theory of Adaptation. Revised ed., Routledge, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipling, Rudyard. “The Man Who Would Be King.” The Man Who Would Be King, and Other Stories, Oxford UP, 1999, pp. 244–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, Peter. “How to Write Adaptation History.” The Oxford Handbook of Adaptation Studies. Edited by Thomas Leitch, Oxford UP, 2017, pp. 661–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, Ian W. Screenwriting Poetics and the Screen Idea, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Aeneas. Report on The Man Who Would Be King for Film Production. John Huston Papers, Margaret Herrick Library, 28-f.275, 24 Apr. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Aeneas. Revised pages for 2 May, 1960 script for The Man Who Would Be King. Undated. John Huston Papers, Margaret Herrick Library, 29-f.281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, Axel. John Huston: A Biography, Doubleday, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manvell, Roger. Theater and Film: A Comparative Study of the Two Forms of Dramatic Art, and of the Problems of Adaptation of Stage Plays into Films, Associated UP, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, Joseph. Writing in Pictures: Screenwriting Made (Mostly) Painless, Vintage, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Simone. The Adaptation Industry: The Cultural Economy of Contemporary Literary Adaptation, Routledge, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelmes, Jill. “Some Thoughts on Analysing the Screenplay, the Process of Screenplay Writing and the Balance between Craft and Creativity.” Journal of Media Practice, vol. 8, no. 2, Sept. 2007, pp. 107–13. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.8.2.107_1.

  • Nelmes, Jill. Analysing the Screenplay, Routledge, 2011, EBSCOhost, http://proxy-s.mercer.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=340034&site=ehost-live.

  • Paramount Pictures production records. (n.d.) Margaret Herrick Library, 100.f-1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasolini, Pier Paolo. “The Screenplay as a ‘Structure That Wants to Be Another Structure.’” American Journal of Semiotics, vol. 4, no. 1/2, 1986, pp. 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Gene D. Some Like It Wilder: The Life and Controversial Films of Billy Wilder, UP of Kentucky, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Steven. The Screenplay: Authorship, Theory and Criticism, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Steven. A History of the Screenplay, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Steven, and Chris Pallant. Storyboarding: A Critical History, Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/merceru/detail.action?docID=4082180 .

  • Roblin, Isabelle, and Shannon Wells-Lassagne. “Screenwriting, Adaptation and the Screen Idea.” Journal of Screenwriting, vol. 7, no. 1, 2016, pp. 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, Jamie. “Adaptation Studies through Screenwriting Studies: Transitionality and the Adapted Screenplay.” Journal of Screenwriting, vol. 7, no. 1, 2016, pp. 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikov, Ed. On Sunset Boulevard: The Life and Times of Billy Wilder, UP of Mississippi, 2017, ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/merceru/detail.action?docID=4908131.

  • The Man Who Would Be King. Directed by John Huston, performed by Sean Connery and Michael Caine, Columbia, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiller, Anthony. Script for The Man Who Would Be King. John Huston Papers, Margaret Herrick Library, 30-f.286, 9 Mar. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venuti, Lawrence. The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of Difference, Taylor and Francis, 1998. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/merceru/detail.action?docID=169424.

  • Viertel, Peter. Script for The Man Who Would Be King. John Huston Papers, Margaret Herrick Library, 28-f.274, 19 July 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolotow, Maurice. Billy Wilder in Hollywood, Limelight, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan C. Glance .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Glance, J.C. (2023). Periphery and Process: Tracing Adaptation Through Screenplays. In: Leitch, T. (eds) The Scandal of Adaptation. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14153-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics