Skip to main content

Self-Cultivation Philosophy as Fusion Philosophy: An Interpretation of Buddhist Moral Thought

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reasons and Empty Persons: Mind, Metaphysics, and Morality
  • 315 Accesses

Abstract

It is often observed that there is little or no moral philosophy in classical Indian Buddhist thought. This is sometimes believed to be surprising since obviously there is an ethical teaching in Buddhism and clearly there are other forms of Buddhist philosophy. In my view, there is something that can plausibly be called moral philosophy in Indian Buddhism, but it is not quite what many people have expected because they have approached the issue from a specific understanding of philosophy that is too limited. I propose to defend this interpretation by reshaping Mark Siderits’ concept of fusion philosophy. The fusion I will propose reveals a form of moral philosophy that may be called self-cultivation philosophy. I will argue that this was a common activity in ancient Chinese, Greek and Indian cultures—including especially early Buddhist thought and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, see Keown (2017). I discussed this issue in Gowans (2015, esp. pp. 54–7 and 161–5), but my perspective here is rather different.

  2. 2.

    See Siderits (2003, pp. xi–xii).

  3. 3.

    See Parfit (1984).

  4. 4.

    For a more recent defense of fusion philosophy, using confluence philosophy as a synonym, and an overview of some work from this approach, see Siderits (2017).

  5. 5.

    For his own account, see Santana (2014).

  6. 6.

    For a similar interpretation of fusion music, see Fellezs (2011).

  7. 7.

    Slingerland (2003, p. 3). Cf. Graham (1989, p. 3).

  8. 8.

    For example, see Allinson (1989), Ames (1985), Ivanhoe (2000) and Slingerland (2003). Of the traditions I discuss in this paper, classical Chinese philosophy is the place where the phrase “self-cultivation philosophy” has some currency.

  9. 9.

    On these points, see Raphals (2011) and Fall (2017), and Wang (2010) and (2012, ch 5).

  10. 10.

    See Hutton (2014). For a helpful collection of contemporary discussions of Xunzi, see Hutton (2016).

  11. 11.

    For interpretations of Xunzi that emphasize self-cultivation, see Ivanhoe (2000, ch 3), Kline III (2006), Schofer (2000), Slingerland (2003, ch 7) and Stalnaker (2006) and (2016).

  12. 12.

    See Ch. 23 of Xunzi for the explanation of Xunzi’s view.

  13. 13.

    Hutton (2014, p. 248 (23.19–24)). In references to historical texts, where ordinary pagination is supplemented by another system, this is given in parentheses.

  14. 14.

    Hutton (2014, p. 233 (21.363)). For Xunzi’s epistemology, see Ch. 21 of Xunzi as a whole.

  15. 15.

    Hutton (2014, p. 8 (1.221–25)).

  16. 16.

    Hutton (2014, p. 218 (20.13)). In an illustration of the earlier point about the broad concept of self-cultivation, Xunzi goes on to say that proper music can cause “perverse and corrupt qi to have no place to attach itself” to us (p. 218 (20.13–14)).

  17. 17.

    However, it is worth noting the challenge to this assessment in the interpretation of Confucius in Fingarette (1972).

  18. 18.

    In recent years, the expression “philosophy as a way of life” has been employed increasingly to refer to many of the phenomena I call self-cultivation philosophies. However, the phrase “way of life” is not the best for my purpose. A philosophy could be a way of life without having the specific structure of self-cultivation philosophies I outline here.

  19. 19.

    Williams (1985, p. 4). See the whole of Williams’ first chapter for an account of the importance of this question.

  20. 20.

    For a defense of Classical Chinese thought as philosophy, see Van Norden (2017).

  21. 21.

    Aristotle (2002, p. 112) (II.2 at the beginning), emphasis added.

  22. 22.

    This is similar to, though not quite the same as, the idea of transformative experience in Paul (2014).

  23. 23.

    See Ganeri (2019, p. 16).

  24. 24.

    See Aristotle (2002, p. 96 (I.3)) and Mill (2002, pp. 6–7 (Ch. 1, par. 5)).

  25. 25.

    Descartes (1993, pp. 26–7 (VI, 38–9)).

  26. 26.

    For example, see Lloyd (1990, p. 124).

  27. 27.

    For interpretations of Epicurus or ancient Epicureanism that in various ways emphasize these features, though without stressing the phrase self-cultivation philosophy, see Cooper (2012, pp. 226–76), Hadot (2002, pp. 113–26), McEvilley (2002, pp. 611–21), Nussbaum (1994, ch. 4), Sorabji (2000) and Tsouna (2009).

  28. 28.

    See Inwood and Gerson (1997, pp. 28–36).

  29. 29.

    Inwood and Gerson (1997, p. 97) (a fragment quoted by Porphyry).

  30. 30.

    See Nussbaum (1994, ch. 1).

  31. 31.

    Inwood and Gerson (1997, p. 28 (122)).

  32. 32.

    Inwood and Gerson (1997, p. 31 (135)).

  33. 33.

    Inwood and Gerson (1997, p. 100) (a fragment quoted by Porphyry).

  34. 34.

    Inwood and Gerson (1997, p. 43) (a fragment quoted by Diogenes).

  35. 35.

    Inwood and Gerson (1997, pp. 30–31 (131)).

  36. 36.

    See O’Keefe (2010, pp. 107 and 120).

  37. 37.

    See Tsouna (2009) for a nice summary of these in the Epicurean tradition.

  38. 38.

    It has been suggested that Epicurus did not encourage his followers to engage in philosophy themselves (see Nussbaum 1994, pp. 129–39 and Cooper 2012, pp. 274–6). For a compelling response to this objection, see Tsouna (2009, 263–5).

  39. 39.

    Inwood and Gerson (1997, p. 30 (131)).

  40. 40.

    See Soni (2010).

  41. 41.

    Ñāṇamoli and Bodhi (1995, pp. 533–36 (I 426–32)).

  42. 42.

    See the “Sammādiṭṭhi Sutta” in Ñāṇamoli and Bodhi (1995, pp. 132–44 (I 46–55)) (leaving aside complications raised by “no view” passages that appear in the Sutta Nipāta).

  43. 43.

    See Ñāṇamoli and Bodhi (1995, pp. 614–16 (I 510–12) and 867 (II 260)).

  44. 44.

    Ñāṇamoli (1999, p. 520 (XVI 87)). I explain the comparison of medicine and philosophy in Buddhist and Hellenistic thought in more detail in Gowans (2010).

  45. 45.

    For example, as in standard formulations of the Four Noble Truths such as Bodhi (2000, vol. 2, pp. 1843–47 (V 420–24)) and Ñāṇamoli and Bodhi (1995, pp. 1097–1101 (III 248–52)).

  46. 46.

    For example, see Bodhi (2012, pp. 291–94 (I 201–205)).

  47. 47.

    Ñāṇamoli and Bodhi (1995, p. 398 (I 301)). I take the Eightfold Path to be a summary of some of the more important practices required to attain enlightenment, not an exhaustive account of all the practices in the Buddha’s teaching.

  48. 48.

    Ñāṇamoli and Bodhi (1995, p. 390 (I 294)).

  49. 49.

    Walshe (1987, p. 131 (I 124)).

  50. 50.

    For example, see Bodhi (2000, vol. 1, pp. 901–903 (III 66–68)). Siderits analyzes this argument in (2007, ch. 3).

  51. 51.

    Ñāṇamoli and Bodhi (1995, pp. 782 (II 173) and 260 (I 167)) respectively.

  52. 52.

    It might also be claimed, from a Mahāyāna point of view, that emptiness, the claim that nothing has an inherent nature, also supports this objection. But I would question this as well. On account of limited space, I have focused here on early Buddhism mainly as expressed in the Pali Canon. However, the basic features of Buddhism I have drawn attention to, such as its psychological analyses, are also present in Mahāyāna Buddhism, and similar (though somewhat more complicated) points could be made there. It might also be objected that, on account of the no-self teaching, it is paradoxical to attribute a self-cultivation philosophy to Buddhism. But any account of Buddhist thought and practice faces this paradox (which is one motivation for the development of distinctions between conventional and ultimate truth).

  53. 53.

    For example, see Ñāṇamoli and Bodhi (1995, pp. 151–54 (I 60–62)).

  54. 54.

    See Ñāṇamoli (1999) and Crosby and Skilton (1995). For valuable discussions of Buddhist philosophy along these lines, see Burton (2010), Dreyfus (1995), Finnigan (2019), Garfield (2015, ch. 9), Heim (2014), McRae (2015) and Wright (2009).

  55. 55.

    The great historical precedent for this, of course, is the development of Buddhism in China starting about the first century C.E. Both the emergence of Chan and the development of what is often called Neo-Confucianism reflect the interaction of Buddhism and native Chinese traditions such as Confucianism and Daoism.

  56. 56.

    I discuss this in Gowans (2010). See also Burton (2010) and Nussbaum (1994).

  57. 57.

    Bernard Williams raised this issue in a critique of Martha Nussbaum’s analysis of Hellenistic philosophy in Nussbaum (1994) (see Williams 1994).

  58. 58.

    For instance, see Tirch et al. (2016).

  59. 59.

    For example, see Coseru (2017), Davis (2017), Dunne (2019), and especially Flanagan (2011) and (2017).

References

  • Allinson, Robert E. 1989. Chuang-Tzu for Spiritual Transformation: An Analysis of the Inner Chapters. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Roger T. 1985. The Common Ground of Self-Cultivation in Classical Taoism and Confucianism. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 17: 65–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2002. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Christopher Rowe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodhi, Bhikkhu, trans. 2000. The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Saṃyutta Nikāya, 2 vols. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, trans. 2012. The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Aṅguttara Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, David. 2010. Curing Diseases of Belief and Desire: Buddhist Philosophical Therapy. In Philosophy as Therapeia, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, ed. Clare Carlisle and Jonardon Ganeri, vol. 66, 187–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, John M. 2012. Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coseru, Christian. 2017. Breaking Good: Moral Agency, Neuroethics, and the Spontaneity of Compassion. In A Mirror is for Reflection: Understanding Buddhist Ethics, ed. Jake H. Davis, 109–128. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, Kate, and Andrew Skilton, trans. 1995. Śāntideva: The Bodhicaryāvatāra. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Jake H. 2017. ‘When You Know for Yourselves’: Mindfulness, Wisdom, and the Qualities of Heart. In A Mirror is for Reflection: Understanding Buddhist Ethics, ed. Jake H. Davis, 223–235. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. 1993. Meditations on First Philosophy. 3rd ed. Trans. Donald A. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Georges. 1995. Meditation as Ethical Activity. Journal of Buddhist Ethics 2: 28–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, John D. 2019. Innate Human Connectivity and Śāntideva’s Cultivation of Compassion. In Readings of Śāntideva’s Guide to Bodhisattva Practice, ed. Jonathan C. Gold and Douglas S. Duckworth. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellezs, Kevin. 2011. Birds of Fire: Jazz, Rock, Funk, and the Creation of Fusion. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, Herbert. 1998. Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press. Original Publication date 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan, Bronwyn. 2019. Śāntideva and the Moral Psychology of Fear. In Readings of Śāntideva’s Guide to Bodhisattva Practice, ed. Jonathan C. Gold and Douglas S. Duckworth. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, Owen. 2011. The Bodhisattva’s Brain: Buddhism Naturalized. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The Geography of Morals: Varieties of Moral Possibility. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganeri, Jonardon. 2019. Epistemic Pluralism: From Systems to Stances. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, Jay L. 2015. Engaging Buddhism: Why It Matters to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowans, Christopher W. 2010. Medical Analogies in Buddhist and Hellenistic Thought: Tranquility and Anger. In Philosophy as Therapeia, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, ed. Clare Carlisle and Jonardon Ganeri, vol. 66, 11–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Buddhist Moral Philosophy: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A.C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadot, Pierre. 2002. What is Ancient Philosophy? Trans. Michael Chase. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Maria. 2014. The Forerunner of All Things: Buddhaghosa on Mind, Intention, and Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, Eric L., trans. 2014. Xunzi: The Complete Text. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 2016. Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Xunzi. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inwood, Brad, and L.P. Gerson, eds. and trans. 1997. Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2000. Confucian Moral Self-Cultivation. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keown, Danien. 2017. ‘It’s Ethics, Jim, but Not as We Know It’: Reflections on the Absence of Moral Philosophy in Buddhism. In A Mirror is for Reflection: Understanding Buddhist Ethics, ed. Jake H. Davis, 17–32. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, T.C., III. 2006. The Therapy of Desire in Early Confucianism: Xunzi. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5: 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G.E.R. 1990. Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvilley, Thomas. 2002. The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies. New York: Allsworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae, Emily. 2015. Buddhist Therapies of the Emotions and the Psychology of Moral Improvement. History of Philosophy Quarterly 32: 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. 2002. Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ñāṇamoli, Bhikkhu, trans. 1999. The Path of Purification (Visuddhimagga) by Bhadantācariya Buddhaghosa. Seattle: Buddhist Publication Society Pariyatta Editions (original publication date 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ñāṇamoli, Bhikkhu, and Bodhi, Bhikkhu, trans. and eds. 1995. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, Tim. 2010. Epicureanism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, L.A. 2014. Transformative Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphals, Lisa. 2011. Embodied Virtue, Self-Cultivation, and Ethics. In Ethics in Early China: An Anthology, ed. Chris Fraser, Dan Robins, and Timothy O’Leary, 143–157. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Chinese Philosophy and Chinese Medicine. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta, Fall 2017 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/chinese-phil-medicine/

  • Santana, Carlos. 2014. The Universal Tone: Bringing My Story to Light. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofer, Jonathan W. 2000. Virtues in Xunzi’s Thought. In Virtue, Nature and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, ed. T.C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe, 69–88. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siderits, Mark. 2003. Personal Identity and Buddhist Philosophy: Empty Persons. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Comparison or Confluence in Philosophy? In The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy, ed. Jonardon Ganeri, 75–89. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Effortless Action: Wu-Wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soni, Jayandra. 2010. Patañjali’s Yoga as Therapeia. In Philosophy as Therapeia, ed. Clare Carlisle and Jonardon Ganeri, 219–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, Richard. 2000. Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, Aaron. 2006. Overcoming Our Evil: Human Nature and Spiritual Exercises in Xunzi and Augustine, Moral Traditions Series. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Xunzi on Self-Cultivation. In Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Xunzi, ed. E.L. Hutton, 35–65. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirch, Dennis, Laura R. Silberstein, and Russell L. Kolts. 2016. Buddhist Psychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: A Clinician’s Guide. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsouna, Voula. 2009. Epicurean Therapeutic Strategies. In The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. James Warren, 249–265. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan W. 2017. Taking Back Philosophy: A Multicultural Manifesto. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshe, Maurice, trans. 1987. The Long Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Dīgha Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Robin. 2010. The Virtuous Body at Work: The Ethical Life as Qi 氣 in Motion. Dao 10: 339–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Robin R. 2012. Yinyang: The Way of Heaven and Earth in Chinese Thought and Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Do Not Disturb: Review of Martha Nussbaum’s the Therapy of Desire. London Review of Books 16 (20): 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Dale S. 2009. The Six Perfections: Buddhism and the Cultivation of Character. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher W. Gowans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gowans, C.W. (2023). Self-Cultivation Philosophy as Fusion Philosophy: An Interpretation of Buddhist Moral Thought. In: Coseru, C. (eds) Reasons and Empty Persons: Mind, Metaphysics, and Morality. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13995-6_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics