Skip to main content

Caput Mortuum: Truth, Freedom, and Negation in Fichte’s Institutiones Omnis Philosophiae

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Being of Negation in Post-Kantian Philosophy
  • 319 Accesses

Abstract

Rejecting the tendency to regard Fichte as merely a transitional figure in the development of German idealism, the following paper argues that, in the years following his dismissal from Jena, Fichte will come to map out a unique and compelling philosophical trajectory. This will be demonstrated, in particular, through a close reading of the Erlanger lectures Institutiones omnis philisophiae of 1805: in these texts, which undertake the pedagogical task of introducing his students to philosophy and indeed achieving a “transformation” of perspective, Fichte makes a fundamental philosophical breakthrough. This becomes possible precisely because his focus on the pedagogical task draws his attention to the most fundamental subjective or even “existential” conditions of philosophical insight, leading him, in turn, to a theorization of the capacity of understanding, by producing contradictions, to open up a space of negativity; a negativity that is itself the essence of human freedom, and through which truth is yielded rather than either discovered or produced. Whereas Hegel and Schelling regard Kant’s residual dualism as a philosophical scandal, Fichte, through this notion of a radical freedom born from the unresolved negativity of the understanding, will seek not to overcome dualism through a higher perspective but to recognize its absolutely binding character.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hegel (1977, 155).

  2. 2.

    Zöller (2000, 200).

  3. 3.

    Beiser (2002, 10–14).

  4. 4.

    Beiser (2002, 304).

  5. 5.

    Pinkard (2002, 129–130).

  6. 6.

    All references to Fichte’s work are to the Gesamtausgabe (1961–2012) of the Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, hereafter FGA. All translations, unless mentioned, are my own.

  7. 7.

    Bertinetto (2009, 343).

  8. 8.

    For a comprehensive account of the atheism controversy, see La Vopa (2001, 402–424).

  9. 9.

    Perhaps the most striking example of this Platonic posture is Fichte’s Closed Commercial State, which conceives of politics as that which achieves the transition from the real and existing state to the ideal state (Fichte 2012).

  10. 10.

    Fuchs (2009, 239).

  11. 11.

    Fuchs (2009, 240–241).

  12. 12.

    Fuchs (2009).

  13. 13.

    FGA II:9, 330. For a comprehensive treatment of the Ideen, see Gerten (2009).

  14. 14.

    FGA II:9, 359.

  15. 15.

    FGA II:9, 359–360.

  16. 16.

    FGA II:9, 360; cf. Gerten (2009, 443–444). For an insightful treatment of the relation between oral and written communication with a view to the Institutiones, see Goubet (2009).

  17. 17.

    FGA II:9, 360.

  18. 18.

    FGA II:9, 36.

  19. 19.

    FGA II:9, 37.

  20. 20.

    FGA II:9, 37.

  21. 21.

    FGA II:9, 16.

  22. 22.

    FGA II:12, 59.

  23. 23.

    See Adler (2019, 200).

  24. 24.

    FGA II:9, 45.

  25. 25.

    FGA II:9, 46.

  26. 26.

    FGA II:9, 47.

  27. 27.

    FGA II:9, 95.

  28. 28.

    FGA II:9, 55.

  29. 29.

    FGA II: 9, 56.

  30. 30.

    FGA II:9, 103–4.

  31. 31.

    FGA II:9, 102.

  32. 32.

    FGA II: 9, 146.

  33. 33.

    FGA II: 9, 146.

  34. 34.

    FGA II, 9: 140.

  35. 35.

    FGA II:9, 167.

  36. 36.

    Cf. Bertinetto (2009, 355).

  37. 37.

    FGA II:9, 141.

  38. 38.

    FGA II:9, 140.

  39. 39.

    FGA II:9, 143.

  40. 40.

    This “bureaucratic” vocation might also be understood, following Smith, as an understanding of the philosopher as “Mandarins,” “embodiments of a state’s ideal of culture” (Smith 2016, 198).

References

  • Adler, Anthony Curtis. 2019. “Der Freiheit ergiebt sich die Wahrheit”: Freedom, Truth, and Image in Fichte’s late Wissenschaftslehre. In Fichtes Bildtheorie im Kontext, Teil I (Fichte-Studien 47), ed. Christian Klotz and Matteo Vincenzo d’Alfonso, 181–203. Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiser, Frederick C. 2002. German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781–1801. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertinetto, Alessandro. 2009. Logik, Metaphysik, Wissenschaftslehre: Die Institutiones omnis philosophiae J.G. Fichtes. In Fichte in Erlangen 1805 (Fichte-Studien 34), ed. Michael Gerten, 343–358. Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichte, J.G. 2012. The Closed Commercial State. SUNY: Trans. Anthony Curtis Adler. Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1961–2012. Gesamtausgabe. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Erich. 2009. Fichte in Erlangen: Historische Umstände und Bedeutung seiner Berufung. In Fichte in Erlangen 1805 (Fichte-Studien 34), ed. Michael Gerten, 235–269. Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerten, Michael. 2009. Fichtes Erlanger und Berliner Ideen für eine Universitätsreform und ihre aktuelle Bedeutung. In Fichte in Erlangen 1805 (Fichte-Studien 34), ed. Michael Gerten, 431–460. Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goubet, Jean-François. 2009. Mündliche und schriftliche gelehrte Kommunikation in Fichtes Erlanger Vorlesungen 1805. In Fichte in Erlangen 1805 (Fichte-Studien 34), ed. Michael Gerten, 417–430. Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. 1977. The Difference Between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy. Trans. H.S. Harris. Albany: SUNY University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Vopa, Anthony J. 2001. Fichte: The Self and the Calling of Philosophy 1762–1799. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkard, Terry. 2002. German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Justin E.H. 2016. The Philosopher: A History in Six Types. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zöller, Günter. 2000. German Realism: The Self-Limitation of Idealist Thinking in Fichte, Schelling, and Schopenhauer. In The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, ed. Karl Ameriks, 200–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Adler, A.C. (2023). Caput Mortuum: Truth, Freedom, and Negation in Fichte’s Institutiones Omnis Philosophiae. In: Moss, G.S. (eds) The Being of Negation in Post-Kantian Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13862-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics