Skip to main content

Du Bois on the Centralized Organization of Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pluralizing Philosophy’s Past
  • 211 Accesses

Abstract

W.E.B. Du Bois successfully organized a sociological research lab in turn-of-the-twentieth-century Atlanta. By examining his practice as a research organizer, as well as the philosophical principles which undergirded much of his scientific work, we can draw lessons about how to solve pressing problems of social epistemology—that is to say, problems with how we produce and disseminate knowledge through collective inquiry. Many of the problems we deal with in contemporary science are caused by problems in our institutional or incentive structures. For instance, we do not sufficiently replicate past work in large part because we have not organized scientific inquiry so as to encourage this. The lessons Du Bois may teach us can thus speak directly to contemporary issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a detailed discussion of the mediate and immediate aims of science, see Bright (2018, §3).

  2. 2.

    For a statement of his methodological pluralism, see the preface to Du Bois (1899). See Heesen et al. (2019) for a detailed discussion and defense of Du Bois’ methodological pluralism.

  3. 3.

    Du Bois was a lifelong pan-Africanist, and it is also important to place his work in the context of broader trends in African thought that may have exercised influence on his work.

References

  • Avin, Shahar. 2015. Breaking the Grant Cycle: On the Rational Allocation of Public Resources to Scientific Research Projects. PhD diss., University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Policy Considerations for Random Allocation of Research Funds. RT. A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation 6 (1): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Mavericks and Lotteries. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 76: 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battle-Baptiste, Witney, and Britt Rusert, eds. 2018. W.E.B. Du Bois’s Data Portraits: Visualizing Black America. Hudson, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, J.D. 1949. The Freedom of Necessity. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, Liam Kofi. 2018. Du Bois’ Democratic Defence of the Value Free Ideal. Synthese 195 (5): 2227–2245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2022. Ida B. Wells-Barnett’s The Red Record. In Neglected Classics of Philosophy, II, ed. Eric Schliesser. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190097196.003.0009

  • Brown, Mark B. 2009. Science in Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dang, Haixin. 2019. Do Collaborators in Science Need to Agree? Philosophy of Science 86 (5): 1029–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Heather. 2017. Science, Values, and Citizens. In Eppur Si Muove: Doing History and Philosophy of Science with Peter Machamer, ed. Marcus P. Adams, Zvi Biener, Uljana Feest, and Jacqueline A. Sullivan, 83–96. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W.E.B. 1898. The study of the Negro problems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1899. The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1903] 1994. “The Sorrow Songs” In The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1905] 2000. “Sociology Hesitant.” Boundary 2 27 (3): 37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 1906a. The Health and Physique of the Negro American. No. 11. Atlanta: Atlanta University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1906b. The Economic Future of the Negro. Publications of the American Economic Association 7 (1): 219–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1940] 2007. Dusk of Dawn: An Essay Towards an Autobiography of a Race Concept. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1944] 1990. “My Evolving Program for Negro Freedom.” Clinical Sociology Review 8 (1): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim, Patrick, Daniel J. Singer, Aaron Bramson, Bennett Holman, Sean McGeehan, and William J. Berger. 2019. Diversity, Ability, and Expertise in Epistemic Communities. Philosophy of Science 86 (1): 98–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heesen, Remco. 2017. Academic Superstars: Competent or Lucky? Synthese 194 (11): 4499–4518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Why the Reward Structure of Science Makes Reproducibility Problems Inevitable. The Journal of Philosophy 115 (12): 661–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heesen, Remco, and Jan-Willem Romeijn. 2019. Epistemic Diversity and Editor Decisions: A Statistical Matthew Effect. Philosophers' Imprint 19 (39): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heesen, Remco, Liam Kofi Bright, and Andrew Zucker. 2019. Vindicating Methodological Triangulation. Synthese 196 (8): 3067–3308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman, Bennett, and Kevin C. Elliott. 2018. The Promise and Perils of Industry-Funded Science. Philosophy Compass 13 (11): e12544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip. 2003. Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2009. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kummerfeld, Erich, and Kevin J.S. Zollman. 2015. Conservatism and the Scientific State of Nature. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 1057–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, Michèle. 2009. How Professors Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Carole J. 2015. Commensuration Bias in Peer Review. Philosophy of Science 82 (5): 1272–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machery, Edouard. 2020. What is a Replication? Philosophy of Science 87 (4): 545–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Aldon. 2017. The Scholar Denied: W.E.B. Du Bois and the Birth of Modern Sociology. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munafò, Marcus R., and George Davey Smith. 2018. Robust Research Needs Many Lines of Evidence. Nature 553 (7689): 399–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto. 1946. The Orchestration of the Sciences by the Encyclopedism of Logical Empiricism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6 (4): 496–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Science 349 (6251): aac4716-1–aac4716-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, Felipe. 2018. Who Should Do Replication Labor? Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (4): 516–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamblyn, Robyn, Nadyne Girard, Christina J. Qian, and James Hanley. 2018. Assessment of Potential Bias in Research Grant Peer Review in Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal 190 (16): E489–E499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsberg, Eric, Bryce Huebner, and Rebecca Kukla. 2014. Accountability and Values in Radically Collaborative Research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 46: 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherall, James Owen, Cailin O’Connor, and Justin P. Bruner. 2020. How to Beat Science and Influence People: Policymakers and Propaganda in Epistemic Networks. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4): 1157–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright II, Earl. 2017. The First American School of Sociology: W.E.B. Du Bois and the Atlanta Sociological Laboratory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollman, Kevin J.S. 2018. The Credit Economy and the Economic Rationality of Science. The Journal of Philosophy 115 (1): 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bright, L.K. (2023). Du Bois on the Centralized Organization of Science. In: Griffioen, A.L., Backmann, M. (eds) Pluralizing Philosophy’s Past. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13405-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics