Skip to main content

Hegel, Schelling and Günderrode on Nature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Feminist Philosophy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism ((PHGI))

  • 323 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter compares the philosophies of nature of Schelling, Hegel, and Günderrode. For Schelling, nature is organized by a dynamic opposition between polar forces that have gendered connotations. For Hegel, the interaction between the concept and matter organizes nature, and he again construes the concept and matter in hierarchical and gendered terms. For her part Günderrode puts birth, death, and rebirth at the center of nature, taking a view of the earth which anticipates recent feminist philosophies of natality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For classic feminist statements, see Hélène Cixous, “Sorties,” in The Newly Born Woman, with Catherine Clément, trans. Betsy Wing (Manchester: Manchester University Press, [1975] 1986); Luce Irigaray, Speculum of the Other Woman, trans. Gillian C. Gill (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, [1974] 1985); Genevieve Lloyd, The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1984).

  2. 2.

    In discussing these historical assumptions, I do not use a sex/gender distinction, as this distinction only began to be made in the 1960s.

  3. 3.

    See Lloyd, Man of Reason, chs. 5 and 6.

  4. 4.

    Irigaray, Speculum.

  5. 5.

    Eileen O’Neill, “Disappearing Ink: Early Modern Women Philosophers and Their Fate in History,” in Philosophy in a Feminist Voice, ed. Janet A. Kourany, 17–62 (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998).

  6. 6.

    On women’s contributions to German idealism and Romanticism, see Alison Stone and Giulia Valpione, “Idealism and Romanticism,” in The Oxford Handbook of Nineteenth-Century Women Philosophers in the German Tradition, ed. Kristin Gjesdal and Dalia Nassar (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022 forthcoming); Laure Cahen-Maurel and Giulia Valpione, ed. Symphilosophie 2: The Women Writers of Philosophical Romanticism (2020), https://symphilosophie.com/symphilosophie-2-2020-eng/.

  7. 7.

    See Alison Assiter, Kierkegaard, Eve and Metaphors of Birth (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015); Alison Stone, “Nature, Freedom and Gender in Schelling,” in Schelling’s Philosophy: Nature, Freedom, and Systematicity, ed. G. Anthony Bruno (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 168–184.

  8. 8.

    Although not entirely, for full unification requires the journey through the stages of mind as well, narrated in the third part of the Encyclopedia, the Philosophy of Mind.

  9. 9.

    See the chapter by Kimberly Hutchings in this volume.

  10. 10.

    On Günderrode’s reading see S. D. Martinson, “‘… aus dem Schiffbruch des irdischen Lebens’: The Literature of Karoline von Günderrode and Early German Romantic and Idealist Philosophy,” German Studies Review 28, no. 2 (2005), 303–326.

  11. 11.

    Creuzer had arranged for the publication of Melete, but he shelved it when Günderrode, tragically, committed suicide in 1806.

  12. 12.

    On Günderrode’s philosophy of plants see the chapter by Elaine Miller in this volume and on Günderrode’s idea of history and temporality see the chapter by Dalia Nassar.

  13. 13.

    For all Günderrode’s notes on these various natural phenomena, see SWuS 2: 359–406.

  14. 14.

    For another account of Günderrode’s differences from Schelling, see Helga Dormann, Die Kunst des inneren Sinns. Mythisierung der inneren und äusseren Natur im Werk Karoline von Günderrodes (Wuerzburg: Königshausen und Neumann, 2004). Dormann argues that Günderrode differs from Schelling because her approach to nature is Romantic—hence aesthetic, symbolic, and mythological—rather than idealist, i.e., delineating various stages of realisation of the Absolute. I see Günderrode as closer to idealism.

  15. 15.

    Schelling entertained the possibility of future spiritual existence in the afterlife in Clara, but this is from around 1810 so post-dates Günderrode’s work. See Schelling, Clara: Or, On Nature’s Connection to the Spirit World, trans. Fiona Steinkamp (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2002).

  16. 16.

    Günderrode’s association of struggle and fighting with masculinity is evident in her dramatic writings, which often deal with male military leaders. She felt they trampled lesser individuals underfoot, but her fascination with them remained. See Stone and Valpione, “Romanticism and Idealism,” sec. iv.

  17. 17.

    Günderrode, letter to ‘Gunda’ (Kunigunde) Brentano, 29 August 1801, cited in Christa Wolf, Der Schatten eines Traumes (Darmstadt: Luchterhand, 1981), 140.

  18. 18.

    No feminist, Hegel took a dim view of the multiply-married Caroline Schlegel-Schelling; see Terry Pinkard, Hegel: A Biography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 113, 192–193. Had Hegel known of Günderrode, I suspect that he would have disapproved of her too—not only because he saw intellectual women as an aberration, but also on account of Günderrode’s suicide and her illicit affair with the already-married Creuzer.

  19. 19.

    Many German idealists and romantics were greatly interested in and enthusiastic about the “Orient” and Günderrode was no exception. See, for discussion, Martin Bernal, Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1987), vol. 1, ch. 5; Suzanne Marchand, German Orientalism in the Age of Empire: Religion, Race and Scholarship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).

  20. 20.

    See Luce Irigaray, Sexes and Genealogies, trans. Gillian C. Gill (New York: Columbia University Press, [1987] 1993).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Stone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stone, A. (2022). Hegel, Schelling and Günderrode on Nature. In: Lettow, S., Pulkkinen, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Feminist Philosophy. Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13123-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics