Abstract
Metacognition is often emphasised in English language education and acknowledged to be essential for primary English learners. Teacher metacognition however has received less attention in the scholarly literature. This chapter refocuses attention on to the teacher as a crucial driving force for promoting metacognition in the primary English language classroom. It localises metacognition in the Singaporean primary English language context and specific course practices in a teacher education programme are then described to show how support is provided for student teachers in this area. The chapter concludes with reflective insights and implications for embedding metacognitive practices in primary English language teacher education more widely.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Curriculum Planning & Development Division (CPDD). (2020). English language syllabus 2020: Primary. Ministry of Education.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement. Teachers College.
Duffy, G. G., Miller, S., Parsons, S., & Meloth, M. (2009). Teachers as metacognitive professionals. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 240–256). Taylor & Francis.
Fathima, M. P., Sasikumar, N., & Roja, M. P. (2014). Enhancing teaching competency of graduate teacher trainees through metacognitive intervention strategies. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 2(1), 27–32.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Haukås, Å., Bjørke, C., & Dypedahl, M. (2018). Metacognition in language learning and teaching. Taylor & Francis.
Konstantopoulos, S., & Chung, V. (2011). The persistence of teacher effects in elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 361–386. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210382888
Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009). Investigating preservice teachers’ professional growth in self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013101
Lambert, M. D. (2015). Reading picture books with children: How to shake up storytime and get kids talking about what they see. Charlesbridge.
Lee, S. C., Irving, K., Pape, S., & Owens, D. (2015). Teachers’ use of interactive technology to enhance students’ metacognition: Awareness of student learning and feedback. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(2), 175–198.
McCormick, C. B. (2003). Metacognition and learning. In I. B. Weiner, W. M. Reynolds, & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (pp. 79–102). Wiley.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2013). Teachers for the 21st century: Using evaluation to improve teaching. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.
Perry, J., Lundie, D., & Golder, G. (2019). Metacognition in schools: What does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools? Educational Review, 71(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1441127
Prytula, M. P. (2012). Teacher metacognition within the professional learning community. International Education Studies, 5(4), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n4p112
Rockoff, J. E., Jacob, B. A., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2011). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one? Education Finance and Policy, 6(1), 43–74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/educfinapoli.6.1.43
Spandel, V. (2013). Creating writers: 6 traits, process, workshop, and literature. Allyn & Bacon.
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.
Wenden, A. (1987). Metacognition: An expanded view on the cognitive abilities of L2 learners. Language Learning, 37(4), 573–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00585.x
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. Prentice-Hall.
Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515
Yuen, S. (2017, December 20). Parliament: NCMP Leon Perera calls for reduced class sizes. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/parliament-ncmp-leon-perera-calls-for-reduced-class-sizes
Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2018). Metacognition in TESOL: Theory and practice. The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0803
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
1.1 Appendix 1 Teaching Demonstration/Micro-teaching Discussion Frame
Lesson stages | Key moves | Reflections |
---|---|---|
1. Pre Reading  Activating schema  Book conventions  Picture cues  Initial predictions |  |  |
2. During Reading  Discover the story: Picture cues, story context (characters, plot, setting, themes), Responses to story  Confirmation of initial predictions  Further predictions  Second reading task |  |  |
3. Post Reading  Checking understanding |  |  |
1.2 Appendix 2 Teaching Attachment
 | Part 1 | ||
 | TEACHING PROCESSES | Please tick (if observed) | What have I learnt …my reflections/comments … |
1 | What I learnt from the pre-lesson discussions | ||
 | In the pre-lesson discussion, I deepened my understanding of learning objectives, lesson planning and the lesson preparation process. |  |  |
 | In the pre-lesson discussion, I noted how important it is to plan an engaging English language lesson. |  |  |
 | In the pre-lesson discussion, I noted the significance of the need to give children a sense of progress within a lesson. |  |  |
2 | What I learnt during the lesson observation | ||
 | The teacher has the learning outcomes of the lesson in mind during the lesson delivery. |  |  |
 | I noticed that the teacher knows the importance of arousing and sustaining children’s interest and their participation in learning. |  |  |
 | I noticed the use of voice and language for the age range. |  |  |
 | I noticed ways to create an engaging lesson. |  |  |
 | I noticed the ways the teacher checks understanding while monitoring children’s work. |  |  |
 | I noticed that the teacher gave the children useful feedback on their work. |  |  |
 | I noticed that the teacher provides the children with a clear written record of their learning. |  |  |
 | I better understand the role of assessment for learning during a lesson. |  |  |
3 | What I learnt from the post-lesson discussions | ||
 | In the post-lesson discussion, the lesson strengths (and possible areas for improvement) were discussed. |  |  |
 | I have started to consider ways I will incorporate some points in my own teaching practice. |  |  |
 | Part 2 | ||
 | Grade/Class Observed:_______ | ||
1 | My reflections about what went well: | ||
2 | My reflections about what could have been improved/done differently: | ||
3 | Links/differences I noticed between what you have learnt at NIE and how this is applied in the classroom: | ||
4a | Were there any differences between your NIE course input and the classroom? If yes, please give examples. | ||
4b | What challenges between theory and practice arose and how did you address these in the classroom? Please give examples. |
1.3 Appendix 3 Teaching Attachment (Co-teaching Reflection)
 | Part 1 | ||
 | A. TEACHING PROCESSES | Please tick | Personal reflections/comments |
 | LESSON PREPARATION | ||
 | Demonstrates understanding of learning objectives |  |  |
 | Uses age-appropriate teaching strategies, learning activities, and resources |  |  |
 | Displays sound subject knowledge |  |  |
 | Estimates timing realistically |  |  |
 | Shows awareness of children’s backgrounds |  |  |
 | LESSON DELIVERY | ||
 | Creates an engaging introduction and closure |  |  |
 | Paces the lesson appropriately |  |  |
 | Arouses and sustains learners’ interest |  |  |
 | Encourages learners’ active participation |  |  |
 | Gives clear instructions |  |  |
 | Makes good use of questions |  |  |
 | Uses voice to create interest |  |  |
 | Grades language appropriately for the learners’ ages and language level |  |  |
 | Makes effective use of resources and materials |  |  |
 | ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK | ||
 | Gives learners appropriate feedback |  |  |
 | Monitors and checks learners’ understanding |  |  |
 | Provides learners with a clear written record |  |  |
 | Varies assessment practices for the task/activity |  |  |
 | POSITIVE CLASSROOM ATMOSPHERE | ||
 | Builds rapport with learners using personalisation |  |  |
 | Creates a positive classroom environment |  |  |
 | B. PROFESSIONALISM | Please tick | Personal reflections/comments |
 | LEARNER-CENTRED VALUES | ||
 | Shows care and concern for children |  |  |
 | Demonstrates warmth and enthusiasm |  |  |
 | Is sensitive to sociocultural diversity |  |  |
 | TEACHER ATTRIBUTES | ||
 | Is receptive to feedback |  |  |
 | Shows evidence of being reflective |  |  |
 | Interacts well with the school community |  |  |
 | MY REFLECTION(S)… | ||
 | My reflections/thoughts on what went well and what could have been improved/done differently: | ||
 | Part 2 | ||
1. | What differences have you noticed in teaching styles during the lessons you observed? Please give examples. | ||
2. | What aspects from your course at NIE have you observed during lessons in schools? Please give examples of any links/differences. | ||
3. | What are the main aspects you have learned from your practicum about effective English language classroom practices? |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lim, D., Renandya, W.A., Kaur, K. (2022). Mainstreaming Metacognitive Practices in Primary English Teacher Education Programmes. In: Valente, D., Xerri, D. (eds) Innovative Practices in Early English Language Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12922-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12922-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12921-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12922-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)