Skip to main content

Diagnostic Analysis of CMAQ Dry Deposition Fields in the Context of AQMEII4

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXVIII (ITM 2021)

Abstract

Phase 4 of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII4) is focused on the diagnostic intercomparison and evaluation of deposition simulated by regional-scale air quality modeling systems and employs both grid and box modeling techniques to accomplish this goal. This study presents an analysis of CMAQv5.3.1 simulations that were performed in the context of AQMEII4 over a North American modeling domain. Results show that variability in the estimated dry deposition sink affected model performance and resulted from both differences in model process formulation and the representation of the underlying land use (LU). To gain mechanistic insights into model behavior, the study employs diagnostic variables defined for the AQMEII4 project, i.e., grid scale and land-use specific effective conductances and deposition fluxes for the major dry deposition pathways (stomatal, cuticular, lower canopy, and soil). Analysis of these variables indicates that there generally is a greater contribution to ozone dry deposition from the stomatal and cuticular pathways in the CMAQ M3DRY dry deposition scheme compared to CMAQ STAGE dry deposition scheme and that differences in LU classification schemes can have a pronounced impact on simulated fluxes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appel, K. W., Bash, J. O., Fahey, K. M., Foley, K. M., Gilliam, R. C., Hogrefe, C., Hutzell, W. T., Kang, D., Mathur, R., Murphy, B. N., Napelenok, S. L., Nolte, C. G., Pleim, J. E., Pouliot, G. A., Pye, H. O. T., Ran, L., Roselle, S. J., Sarwar, G., Schwede, D. B., Sidi, F. I., Spero, T. L., & Wong, D. C. (2021). The community multiscale air quality model version 5.3 and 5.3.1: System updates and evaluation. Geoscientific Model Development. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2867-2021

  • Clifton, O. E., Paulot, F., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Correa, G., Fares, S., Goded, I., Goldstein, A. H., Gruening, C., Hogg, A. J., Loubet, B., Mammarella, I., Munger, J. W., Neil, L., Stella, P., Uddling, J., Vesala, T., & Weng, E. (2020). Influence of dynamic ozone dry deposition on ozone pollution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032398

  • Galmarini, S., Makar, P., Clifton, O., Hogrefe, C., Bash, J., Bianconi, R., Bellasio, R., Bieser, J., Butler, T., Ducker, J., Flemming, J., Hozdic, A., Holmes, C., Kioutsioukis, I., Kranenburg, R., Lupascu, A., Perez-Camanyo, J. L., Pleim, J., Ryu, Y.-H., San Jose, R., Schwede, D., Silva, S., Garcia Vivanco, M., & Wolke, R. (2021). Technical note—AQMEII4 activity 1: Evaluation of wet and dry deposition schemes as an integral part of regional-scale air quality models. Atmosheric Chemistry and Physics, Discussion. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-313

  • Paulot, F., Malyshev, S., Nguyen, T., Crounse, J. D., Shevliakova, E., & Horowitz, L. W. (2018). Representing sub-grid scale variations in nitrogen deposition associated with land use in a global Earth system model: Implications for present and future nitrogen deposition fluxes over North America. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(24), 17963–17978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2019). CMAQ (Version 5.3.1) [Software]. Available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3585898

Download references

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the view or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Hogrefe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hogrefe, C. et al. (2022). Diagnostic Analysis of CMAQ Dry Deposition Fields in the Context of AQMEII4. In: Mensink, C., Jorba, O. (eds) Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXVIII. ITM 2021. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12786-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics