Abstract
The complexity of socio-technical systems (SS) requires tools that facilitate the understanding of their behaviour and daily performance under the perspective of safety management, therefore Resilience Engineering (RE) and its tools can help with this purpose. In this study, a literature review about the application of the Resilience Assessment Grid (RAG) in different sectors in the last decade is performed. The information was selected from the following databases: Scopus, Wos, ScienceDirect and PubMed, guided by the PRISMA methodology using search criteria by title, abstract and keywords. The most used basic tool is the RAG, which applied individually or in combination helps to understand the behaviour of these complex socio-technical systems (CSS) under the perspective of safety management. The tools used in the last decade in RE studies with the RAG in different sectors are presented chronologically. Safety-II could be considered as a suitable management system at present, where the RE helps to measure resilient performance potential in the CSS, but not resilience per se, using the RAG individually or in combination, with the basic number of questions or structured in a customised way.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Apneseth, K., Wahl, A.M., Hollnagel, E.: Measuring resilience in integrated planning. In: Albrechtsen, E., Besnard, D. (eds). Oil and Gas, Technology and Humans: Assessing the Human Factors of Technological Change (2013)
Bertoni, V.B., Ransolin, N., Wachs, P., Righi, A.W.: Resilience, safety and health: reflections about Covid-19’ assistance. In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems: Vol. 222 LNNS, pp. 239–245 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74611-7_33
Carvalho, E.A., Gomes, J.O., Jatobá, A., Silva, M.F., Carvalho, P.V.R.: Software requirements elicitation for complex systems with the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM). In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3466933.3466950
Chuang, S., Ou, J.C., Hollnagel, E., Hou, S. K.: Measurement of resilience potential—development of a resilience assessment grid for emergency departments. PLoS ONE 15(9 September 2020a). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239472
Chuang, S., Ou, J.C., Ma, H.P.: Measurement of resilience potentials in emergency departments: applications of a tailored resilience assessment grid. Saf. Sci. 121, 385–393 (2020b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.012
Darrow, L., Eseonu, C.I.: Development of a resilience analysis grid survey tool for healthcare. In: 67th Annual Conference and Expo of the Institute of Industrial Engineers 2017, pp. 1163–1168, (2017)
de Linhares, T.Q., Maia, Y.L., Ferreira Frutuoso e Melo, P.F.: The phased application of STAMP, FRAM and RAG as a strategy to improve complex sociotechnical system safety. Progress in Nuclear Energy 131, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNUCENE.2020.103571
Djunaidi, Z., Tantia, A.A., Wirawan, M.: Analysis of the safety resilience implementation in the maritime industry at public and private companies (A Case Study in Indonesia). Safety 7(3) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/safety7030056
Falegnami, A., Bilotta, F., Pugliese, F., Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., Tronci, M., Patriarca, R.: A multicountry comparative survey about organizational resilience in anaesthesia. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 24(6), 1347–1357 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13054
Furniss, D., Curzon, P., Blandford, A.: Using FRAM beyond safety: a case study to explore how sociotechnical systems can flourish or stall. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 17(5–6), 507–532 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2016.1155238
Hegde, S., Hettinger, A.Z., Fairbanks, R.J., Wreathall, J., Krevat, S.A., Bisantz, A.M.: Knowledge elicitation to understand resilience: a method and findings from a health care case study. J. Cognitive Eng. Decision Making 14(1), 75–95 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343419877719
Hegde, S., Hettinger, A.Z., Fairbanks, R.J., Wreathall, J., Wears, R. L., Bisantz, A.M.: Knowledge elicitation for resilience engineering in health care. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2015-January, pp. 175–179. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591036
Hollnagel, E.: Safety-II in practice: developing the resilience potentials. Safety-II in Practice: Developing the Resilience Potentials 1–130 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315201023
Kim, D.H.: Application of RAG (Resilience Assessment Grid) of the aviation safety organization in response to the COVID-19 situation. J. Korean Soc. Aeronaut. Sci. Flight Oper. 29(1), 38–46 (2021)
Klockner, K., Meredith, P.: Measuring resilience potentials: a pilot program using the resilience assessment grid. Safety 6(4) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/safety6040051
Lališ, A., Patriarca, R., Ahmad, J., Gravio, G.D., Kostov, B.: Functional modeling in safety by means of foundational ontologies. Transport. Res. Proc. 43, 290–299 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.12.044
Martins, J.B., Carim, G., Saurin, T.A., Costella, M.F.: Integrating safety-I and safety-II: Learning from failure and success in construction sites. Safety Sci. 148 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105672
Pardo-Ferreira, M. del C., Rubio-Romero, J.C., Gibb, A., Calero-Castro, S.: Using functional resonance analysis method to understand construction activities for concrete structures. Safety Sci. 128, 104771 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2020.104771
Patriarca, R.: New trends for risk and safety management in the aviation domain: a resilience engineering perspective. In: New Trends in Civil Aviation—Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on New Trends in Civil Aviation, NTCA 2017, pp. 283–288. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351238649-48
Patriarca, R.: Resilience engineering for sociotechnical safety management. In: Multisystemic Resilience: Adaptation and Transformation in Contexts of Change, pp. 477–492. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095888.003.0025
Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Costantino, F.: Resilience engineering to assess risks for the air traffic management system: a new systemic method. Int. J. Reliab. Saf. 10(4), 323–345 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRS.2016.084477
Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Costantino, F., Falegnami, A., Bilotta, F.: An analytic framework to assess organizational resilience. Saf. Health Work 9(3), 265–276 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.10.005
Peñaloza, G.A., Saurin, T.A., Formoso, C.T.: Monitoring complexity and resilience in construction projects: the contribution of safety performance measurement systems. Appl. Ergonom. 82(2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102978
Peñaloza, G.A., Torres Formoso, C., Abreu Saurin, T.: A resilience engineering-based framework for assessing safety performance measurement systems: a study in the construction industry. Safety Sci. 142 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105364
Ratnitsky, A., Havranek, J., Mohr, G.L., Rüther-Wolf, K., Schwendimann, R.: Safety-II in daily clinical practice. Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen 162, 10–15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2021.02.003
Rigaud, E., Neveu, C., Langa, S.D.: Lessons from the application of a resilience engineering based assessment method to evaluate the resilience of a train departure and arrival management system. In: Safety and Reliability—Safe Societies in a Changing World—Proceedings of the 28th International European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2018, 28th Annual International European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL) CL-Trondheim, Norway Pu-Crc Press-Balkema Pi-Leiden Pa-Po Box 11320, Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands, pp. 1241–1246. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351174664-156
Rigaud, E., Neveu, C., Duvenci-Langa, S., Obrist, M.-N., Rigaud, S.: Proposition of an organisational resilience assessment framework dedicated to railway traffic management. In: Dadashi, N., Scott, A., Wilson, J.R., Mills, A. (eds.) Rail Human Factors: Supporting Reliability, Safety and Cost Reduction (Issues 4th International Rail Human Factors Conference CL-London, England Pu-Crc Press-Taylor & Francis Group Pi-Boca Raton Pa-6000 Broken Sound Parkway Nw, Ste 300, Boca Raton, FL 33487–2742 USA, pp. 727–732. (2013)
Rodríguez, M., Lawson, E., Butler, D.: A study of the resilience analysis grid method and its applicability to the water sector in England and Wales. Water and Environ. J. 34(4), 623–633 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12539
Rosso, C.B., Saurin, T.A.: The joint use of resilience engineering and lean production for work system design: a study in healthcare. Appl. Ergon. 71, 45–56 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.04.004
Rubio-Romero, J.C., Molinillo, S., López-Arquillos, A., Arjona-Jiménez, R., De La Varga-Salto, J.M.: Comparative study of resilience engineering in solid waste treatment plants: a case study in two European cities. Work 60(4), 613–622 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182769
Said, S., Bouloiz, H., Gallab, M.: A new structure of sociotechnical system processes using resilience engineering. Int. J. Eng. Business Managem. 11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979019827151
Siegel, A.W., Schraagen, J.M.C.: Beyond procedures: team reflection in a rail control centre to enhance resilience. Saf. Sci. 91, 181–191 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.013
Smoczynski, P., Gill, A., Kadzinski, A.: Safety recommendations as a method of strengthening resilience of the railway system. In: Transport Means—Proceedings of the International Conference, 2020-September, pp. 804–809 (2020). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85099780507&partnerID=40&md5=7a98fb4b2c178f543f8d9e402f619099
Stanton, N.A.: East: a method for investigating social, information and task networks. In: Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors 2014, pp. 395–402. (2014). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84896910743&partnerID=40&md5=516e6cfaaf175cda0cce40acdad46abb
Trinh, M.T., Feng, Y.: Measuring resilient safety culture of construction projects. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing vol. 791, pp. 580–586 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_56
Trinh, M.T., Feng, Y., Mohamed, S.: Framework for measuring resilient safety culture in vietnam’s construction environment. J. Construct. Eng. Managem. 145(2) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001602
Xu, G., Li, F., Chen, C.-H., Lee, C.-H., Lee, Y.-C.: Toward resilient vessel traffic service: a sociotechnical perspective. Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng. 5, 829–836 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-779-5-829
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to the "Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación del Gobierno de España" and the "Programa Estatal de Generación de Conocimiento y Retos de la Sociedad" for funding the project: PID2020-114502GB-I00; entitled: “Complejidad y resiliencia: Un enfoque sistémico para la monitorización y mejora de la gestión de la seguridad en la construcción”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tierra-Arévalo, J.M., del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira, M., Rubio-Romero, J.C., Herrera-Pérez, V. (2023). The Resilience Assessment Grid in Day-To-Day Work. In: Arezes, P.M., et al. Occupational and Environmental Safety and Health IV. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 449. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12547-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12547-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12546-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12547-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)