Skip to main content

Combined Surgical Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgery of the Cerebellopontine Angle

Abstract

The decision regarding which surgical approach to use during exposure of the posterior fossa requires careful analysis by surgeons. The degree of exposure required is critical in determining the optimum route of attack. The need to visualize the lesion and surrounding eloquent structures adequately so that resection can be undertaken safely must be weighed against the potential complications associated with each type of approach. In the axial plane, the skull-base of the posterior fossa can be exposed through multiple directions broadly classified as posterior or lateral approaches (Fig. 6.1a). In the sagittal plane, the options include supratentorial or infratentorial directions (Fig. 6.1b). In both cases, combinations of these approaches may allow the greatest degree of exposure. This strategy maximizes the potential for safe surgical resection of the pathology in question while limiting potential risks to the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Horgan MA, Anderson GJ, Kellogg JX, et al. Classification and quantification of the petrosal approach to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:108–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawase T, Shiobara R, Toya S. Anterior transpetrosal transtentorial approach for sphenopetroclival meningiomas: surgical method and results in 10 patients. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:869–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldwin HZ, Miller CG, van Loveren HR, et al. The far lateral/combined supra and infratentorial approach. A human cadaveric prosection model for routes of access to the petroclival region and ventral brain stem. J Neurosurg. 1994;81:60–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hitselberger WE, House WF. A combined approach to the cerebellopontine angle. A suboccipital-petrosal approach. Arch Otolaryngol. 1966;84:267–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spetzler RF, Daspit CP, Pappas CT. The combined supra and infratentorial approach for lesions of the petrous and clival regions: experience with 46 cases. J Neurosurg. 1992;76:588–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baldwin HZ, Spetzler RF, Daspit CP. Extended transpetrosal approaches to the craniovertebral junction. In: Dickman CA, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VKH, editors. Surgery of the craniovertebral junction. New York: Thieme; 1998. p. 491–506.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koutourousiou M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Vaz-Guimaraes Filho F, et al. Outcomes of endonasal and lateral approaches to petroclival meningiomas. World Neurosurg. 2017;99:500–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofstetter CP, Singh A, Anand VK, Kacker A, Schwartz TH. The endoscopic, endonasal, transmaxillary transpterygoid approach to the pterygopalatine fossa, infratemporal fossa, petrous apex, and the Meckel cave. J Neurosurg. 2010;113:967–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for petrous apex lesions. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson BG, Spetzler RF. Far-lateral suboccipital approach to the craniovertebral junction. In: Dickman CA, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VKH, editors. Surgery of the craniovertebral junction. New York: Thieme; 1998. p. 467–81.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laing RJ, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M. A study of perioperative lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure in patient undergoing acoustic neuroma surgery. Skull Base Surg. 2000;10:179–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. House WF. Translabyrinthine approach. In: House WF, Luetje CM, editors. Acoustic tumors. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1979. p. 43–87.

    Google Scholar 

  13. House WF, Hitselberger WE. The transcochlear approach to the skull base. Arch Otolaryngol. 1976;102:334–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ammirati M, Spallone A, Feghali J, et al. The endolymphatic sac: microsurgical topographic anatomy. Neurosurgery. 1995;36:416–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawase T, Toya S, Shiobara R, Mine T. Transpetrosal approach for aneurysms of the lower basilar artery. J Neurosurg. 1985;63:857–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maceri DR, Giannotta SL. The combined retrolabyrinthine/retrosigmoid approach. Oper Tech Neurosurg. 1999;2:48–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisch U. Infratemporal fossa approach to tumours of the temporal bone and base of the skull. J Laryngol Otol. 1978;92:949–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim YH, Jeon C, Se YB, et al. Clinical outcomes of an endoscopic transclival and transpetrosal approach for primary skull base malignancies involving the clivus. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(5):1454–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E3.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kassam AB, Vescan AD, Carrau RL, et al. Expanded endonasal approach: vidian canal as a landmark to the petrous internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg. 2008;108(1):177–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Gompel JJ, Alikhani P, Tabor MH, et al. Anterior inferior petrosectomy: defining the role of endonasal endoscopic techniques for petrous apex approaches. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:1321–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, et al. The front door to Meckel’s cave: an anteromedial corridor via expanded endoscopic endonasal approach—technical considerations and clinical series. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(3 Suppl):ons71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Gardner P, Rhoton AL Jr. An anteromedial corridor to Meckel’s cave via expanded endoscopic endonasal approach: technical considerations and clinical series. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:ons171–83.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R. The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(ONS Suppl 1):ONS213–4.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mason E, Rompaey JV, Solares CA, Figueroa R, Prevedello D. Subtemporal retrolabyrinthine (posterior petrosal) versus endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region: an anatomical and computed tomography study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2016;77:231–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Janjua MB, Caruso JP, Greenfield JP, Souweidane MM, Schwartz TH. The combined transpetrosal approach: anatomic study and literature review. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;41:36–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dubey A, Sung WS, Shaya M, et al. Complications of posterior cranial fossa surgery—an institutional experience of 500 patients. Surg Neurol. 2009;72:369–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Watanabe T, Katayama Y, Fukushima T, Kawamata T. Lateral supracerebellar transtentorial approach for petroclival meningiomas: operative technique and outcome. J Neurosurg. 2011;115:49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Morisako H, Goto T, Ohata K. Petroclival meningiomas resected via a combined transpetrosal approach: surgical outcomes in 60 cases and a new scoring system for clinical evaluation. J Neurosurg. 2015;122:373–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Flannery TJ, Kano H, Lunsford LD, Sirin S, Tormenti M, Niranjan A, et al. Long-term control of petroclival meningiomas through radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2010;112:957–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jean WC, Felbaum DR, Anaizi A, DeKlotz TR. Endoscopic endonasal approach for transclival resection of a petroclival meningioma: a technical note. Cureus. 2016;8:e641.

    Google Scholar 

  33. d’Avella E, Angileri F, de Notaris M, et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal transclival approach to the ventrolateral brainstem and related cisternal spaces: anatomical study. Neurosurg Rev. 2014;37:253–60; discussion 260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oyama K, Prevedello DM, Ditzel Filho LF, et al. Anatomic comparison of the endonasal and transpetrosal approaches for interpeduncular fossa access. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37:E12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pinheiro-Neto CD, Paluzzi A, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Scopel TF, Wang EW, Gardner PA, et al. Extended dissection of the septal flap pedicle for ipsilateral endoscopic transpterygoid approaches. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:391–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nanda A, Javalkar V, Banerjee AD. Petroclival meningiomas: study on outcomes, complications and recurrence rates. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:1268–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mayberg MR, Symon L. Meningiomas of the clivus and apical petrous bone. Report of 35 cases. J Neurosurg. 1986;65:160–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Couldwell WT, Fukushima T, Giannotta SL, Weiss MH. Petroclival meningiomas: surgical experience in 109 cases. J Neurosurg. 1996;84:20–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Al Mefty O, Fox JL, Smith RR. Petrosal approach for petroclival meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 1988;22:510–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sekhar LN, Swamy NK, Jaiswal V, et al. Surgical excision of meningiomas involving the clivus: preoperative and intraoperative features as predictors of postoperative functional deterioration. J Neurosurg. 1994;81:860–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Samii M, Ammirati M, Mahran A, et al. Surgery of petroclival meningiomas: report of 24 cases. Neurosurgery. 1989;24:12–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hakuba A, Nishimura S, Tanaka K, et al. Clivus meningioma: six cases of total removal. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1977;17:63–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sekhar LN, Jannetta PJ, Burkhart LE, Janosky JE. Meningiomas involving the clivus: a six-year experience with 41 patients. Neurosurgery. 1990;27:764–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Little KM, Friedman AH, Sampson JH, et al. Surgical management of petroclival meningiomas: defining resection goals based on risk of neurological morbidity and tumor recurrence rates in 137 patients. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:546–59.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Seifert V, Raabe A, Zimmermann M. Conservative (labyrinthpreserving) transpetrosal approach to the clivus and petroclival region–indications, complications, results and lessons learned. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003;145:631–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Erkmen K, Pravdenkova S, Al MO. Surgical management of petroclival meningiomas: factors determining the choice of approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shen T, Friedman RA, Brackmann DE, et al. The evolution of surgical approaches for posterior fossa meningiomas. Otol Neurotol. 2004;25:394–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kaylie DM, Horgan MA, Delashaw JB, McMenomey SO. Hearing preservation with the transcrusal approach to the petroclival region. Otol Neurotol. 2004;25:594–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sekhar LN, Schessel DA, Bucur SD, et al. Partial labyrinthectomy petrous apicectomy approach to neoplastic and vascular lesions of the petroclival area. Neurosurgery. 1999;44:537–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Samii M, Tatagiba M. Experience with 36 surgical cases of petroclival meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;118:27–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bricolo AP, Turazzi S, Talacchi A, Cristofori L. Microsurgical removal of petroclival meningiomas: a report of 33 patients. Neurosurgery. 1992;31:813–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Goel A, Muzumdar D. Conventional posterior fossa approach for surgery on petroclival meningiomas: a report on an experience with 28 cases. Surg Neurol. 2004;62:332–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Spallone A, Makhmudov UB, Mukhamedjanov DJ, Tcherekajev VA. Petroclival meningioma. An attempt to define the role of skull base approaches in their surgical management. Surg Neurol. 1999;51:412–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Samii M, Tatagiba M, Carvalho GA. Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to Meckel’s cave and the middle fossa: surgical technique and outcome. J Neurosurg. 2000;92:235–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Siwanuwatn R, Deshmukh P, Figueiredo EG, et al. Quantitative analysis of the working area and angle of attack for the retrosigmoid, combined petrosal, and transcochlear approaches to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:137–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Seoane E, Rhoton AL Jr. Suprameatal extension of the retrosigmoid approach: microsurgical anatomy. Neurosurgery. 1999;44:553–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Bambakidis NC, Kumar UK, Kim LJ, et al. The evolution of surgical approaches in the treatment of petroclival meningiomas: a single-center retrospective review. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(5 suppl):202–11.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gonzalez LF, Amin-Hanjani S, Bambakidis NC, Spetzler RF. Skull base approaches to the basilar artery. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Porter RW, Detwiler PW, Spetzler RF, et al. Cavernous malformations of the brainstem: experience with 100 patients. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:50–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Bambakidis NC, Gonzalez LF, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. Combined skull base approaches to the posterior fossa. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19:E8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mark Schornak, Spencer Phippen, Deborah Ravin, and Stephen Harrison for their anatomical drawings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas C. Bambakidis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bambakidis, N.C., Glenn, C.A., Safavi-Abbasi, S., Spetzler, R.F. (2022). Combined Surgical Approaches. In: Bambakidis, N.C., Megerian, C.A., Spetzler, R.F. (eds) Surgery of the Cerebellopontine Angle. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12507-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12507-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12506-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12507-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics