Abstract
The cerebellopontine angle (CPA) is formed by the petrosal cerebellar surface, middle cerebellar peduncle, lateral pons, petrosal surface of the petrous bone, and clival portion of the occipital bone. While only accounting for 10–15% of intracranial tumors, CPA tumors are the most common tumors of the posterior fossa. Vestibular schwannomas (VS) account for 85% of masses in this region, while meningiomas, epidermoids (primary cholesteatomas), and trigeminal, facial, and lower cranial nerve schwannomas constitute the majority of non-VS CPA tumors [1]. The three primary approaches to the CPA are the retrosigmoid, translabyrinthine, and middle fossa approaches. The optimal approach for a given patient depends on the tumor’s growth pattern (e.g., the middle fossa approach is suboptimal for tumors with extensive growth in the CPA), the patient’s hearing status, the surgeon’s expertise in a given approach, and the goals of the operation. Furthermore, the density of crucial structures in this region makes careful preoperative assessment and planning essential in complication avoidance [2]. The retrosigmoid approach allows for hearing preservation and resection of lesions with significant extension into the CPA, though it requires cerebellar retraction and offers limited access to the fundus of the internal auditory canal (IAC). In contrast, the translabyrinthine approach requires very little brain retraction and has no limitation on tumor size or IAC exposure but does require sacrificing hearing. The middle fossa approach, while maintaining hearing preservation, is limited by the extension of the mass lesion into the CPA (~10 mm). In this chapter, we elaborate on these approaches and their variations. We emphasize that these approaches are a continuum of trajectories progressing from an exposure of the face of the petrous bone (retrosigmoid approach) to an anterior view of the brainstem (middle fossa approach; Fig. 5.1). Exposure and comparison of the three main approaches in the context of a VS are summarized in Tables 5.1 and 5.2.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gal TJ, Shinn J, Huang B. Current epidemiology and management trends in acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142:677–81.
Rahimpour S, Friedman AH, Fukushima T, Zomorodi AR. Microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannomas: complication avoidance. J Neuro-Oncol. 2016;130:367–75.
Post KD, Eisenberg MB, Catalano PJ. Hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery: what factors influence outcome? J Neurosurg. 1995;83:191–6.
Catalano PJ, Jacobowitz O, Post KD. Prevention of headache after retrosigmoid removal of acoustic tumors. Am J Otol. 1996;17:904–8.
Naffziger HC. Brain surgery with special reference to exposure of the brain stem and posterior fossa: the principle of intracranial decompression, and relief of impactions in the posterior fossa. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1928;46:241–8.
House WF. Transtemporal bone microsurgical removal of acoustic neuromas. Report of cases. Arch Otolaryngol. 1964;80:617–67.
Jenkins HA, Fisch U. The transotic approach to resection of difficult acoustic tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. Am J Otol. 1980;2:70–6.
Hitselberger WE, Pulec JL. Trigeminal nerve (posterior root) retrolabyrinthine selective section: operative procedure for intractable pain. Arch Otolaryngol. 1972;96:412–5.
Russell SM, Roland JT, Golfinos JG. Retrolabyrinthine craniectomy: the unsung hero of skull base surgery. Skull Base. 2004;14:63–71.
Spetzler RF, Daspit CP, Pappas CTE. The combined supra- and infratentorial approach for lesions of the petrous and clival regions; experience with 46 cases. J Neurosurg. 1992;76:588–99.
Aslan A, Falcioni M, Russo A, De Donato G, Balyan FR, Taibah A, et al. Anatomical considerations of high jugular bulb in lateral skull base surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 1997;111:333–6.
Tubbs RS, Griessenauer C, Loukas M, Ansari SF, Fritsch MH, Gadol AAC. Trautmann’s triangle anatomy with application to posterior transpetrosal and other related skull base procedures. Clin Anat. 2014;27:994–8.
McElveen JT, Wilkins RH, Erwin AC, Wolford RD. Modifying the translabyrinthine approach to preserve hearing during acoustic tumour surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 1991;105:34–7.
Horgan MA, Delashaw JB, Schwartz MS, Kellogg JX, Spektor S, McMenomey SO. Transcrusal approach to the petroclival region with hearing preservation. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:660–6.
Monfared A, Mudry A, Jackler R. The history of middle cranial fossa approach to the cerebellopontine angle. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31:691.
Nonaka Y, Fukushima T, Watanabe K, Friedman AH, McElveen JT, Cunningham CD, et al. Less invasive transjugular approach with Fallopian bridge technique for facial nerve protection and hearing preservation in surgery of glomus jugulare tumors. Neurosurg Rev. 2013;36:579–86.
Parry RH. A case of tinnitus and vertigo treated by division of the auditory nerve. J Laryngol Otol. 1994;19:402–6.
Goddard JC, Schwartz MS, Friedman RA. Fundal fluid as a predictor of hearing preservation in the middle cranial fossa approach for vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31:1128–34.
Martin RG, Grant JL, Peace D, Theiss C, Rhoton ALJ. Microsurgical relationships of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery and the facial-vestibulocochlear nerve complex. Neurosurgery. 1980;6:483.
Schroeder HWS, Oertel J, Gaab MR. Endoscope-assisted microsurgical resection of epidermoid tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. J Neurosurg. 2004;101:227–32.
Tatagiba M, Matthies C, Samii M. Microendoscopy of the internal auditory canal in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Neurosurgery. 1996;38:737–40.
Tatagiba M, Rigante L, Mesquita Filho P, Ebner FH, Roser F. Endoscopic-assisted posterior intradural petrous apicectomy in petroclival meningiomas: a clinical series and assessment of perioperative morbidity. World Neurosurg. 2015;84:1708–18.
Teo C, Nakaji P, Mobbs RJ. Endoscope-assisted microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: technical case report. Oper Neurosurg. 2006;59:489–90.
Charalampaki P, Kafadar AM, Grunert P, Ayyad A, Perneczky A. Vascular decompression of trigeminal and facial nerves in the posterior fossa under endoscope-assisted keyhole conditions. Skull Base. 2007;18:117–28.
Kumon Y, Kohno S, Ohue S, Watanabe H, Inoue A, et al. Usefulness of endoscope-assisted microsurgery for removal of vestibular schwannomas. J Neurol Surg B. 2012;73:42–7.
Setty P, D’Andrea KP, Stucken EZ, Babu S, LaRouere MJ, Pieper DR. Endoscopic resection of vestibular schwannomas. J Neurol Surg B. 2015;76:230–8.
Shahinian HK, Eby JB, Ocon M. Fully endoscopic excision of vestibular schwannomas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2005;47:329–32.
Takemura Y, Inoue T, Morishita T, Rhoton AL Jr. Comparison of microscopic and endoscopic approaches to the cerebellopontine angle. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:427–41.
Abolfotoh M, Bi WL, Hong C-K, Almefty KK, Boskovitz A, Dunn IF, et al. The combined microscopic-endoscopic technique for radical resection of cerebellopontine angle tumors. J Neurosurg. 2015;123:1301–11.
Ebner FH, Koerbel A, Roser F, Hirt B, Tatagiba M. Microsurgical and endoscopic anatomy of the retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to lesions extending from the posterior fossa to the central skull base. Skull Base. 2006;19:319–23.
Grayeli AB, Guindi S, Kalamarides M, Garem HE, Smail M, Rey A, et al. Four-channel electromyography of the facial nerve in vestibular schwannoma surgery: sensitivity and prognostic value for short-term facial function outcome. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26:114.
Legatt AD. Mechanisms of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19:396.
Morawski K, et al. Preventing internal auditory artery vasospasm using topical papaverine: an animal study. Otol Neurotol. 2003;24:918–26.
Strauss C, et al. Vasoactive treatment for hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. J Neurosurg. 2001;95:771–7.
Singh R, Husain AM. Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring of the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;28:582–6.
Schlake HP, Goldbrunner RH, Milewski C, Krauss J, Trautner H, Behr R, et al. Intra-operative electromyographic monitoring of the lower cranial motor nerves (LCN IX-XII) in skull base surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2001;103:72–82.
Topsakal C, Al-Mefty O, Bulsara KR, Williford VS. Intraoperative monitoring of lower cranial nerves in skull base surgery: technical report and review of 123 monitored cases. Neurosurg Rev. 2008;31:45–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rahimpour, S., Zomorodi, A.R., Codd, P.J., Krucoff, M.O., Friedman, A.H., Gonzalez, L.F. (2022). Approaches to the Cerebellopontine Angle. In: Bambakidis, N.C., Megerian, C.A., Spetzler, R.F. (eds) Surgery of the Cerebellopontine Angle. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12507-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12507-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12506-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12507-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)