Skip to main content

From New Public Management to Social Impact Bonds: The European Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Anglo-American Model of Neoliberalism of the 1980s
  • 309 Accesses

Abstract

Defined as financial innovations in which a public entity enters into agreements to pay private investors only in case of achievement of a predefined level of social outcomes, Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) emerged as a mechanism aimed to introduce social innovation into the traditional schemes of public service provisions. More in detail, SIBs are a neoliberal procurement model—based on a mix of contracting out, private finance capital, and Payment-by-Results (PbR)—used for the delivery of social services in several policies and welfare areas. This chapter provides an overview of the SIBs phenomenon in some European countries by offering suggestions for their use to respond to the most pressing economic and social effects of COVID-19.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albertson, K., Fox, C., O’Leary, C., Painter, G., Bailey, K., & LaBarbera, J. (2018). Payment by results and social impact bonds: Outcome-based payment systems in the UK and US. Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, J. M., Clifton, J., & Díaz-Fuentes, D. (2015). Did new public management matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size. Public Management Review, 17, 643–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasiu, A. (2019). SIBs in the Netherlands: Part 1—state of play, an interview with social finance Netherlands co-founder Björn Vennema. Government Outcomes Lab, University of Oxford. https://golab.bsg.ox.ac.uk/community/blogs/sibs-netherlands-state-play/

  • BNP Paribas. (2019). BNP Paribas announces the launch of three new social impact bonds in France. https://group.bnpparibas/en/news/bnp-paribas-announces-launch-social-impact-bonds-france

  • Broom, J. (2021). Social impact bonds and fast policy: Analyzing the Australian experience. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space, 53(1), 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office. (2011). Open public services white paper. Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carè, R., & De Lisa, R. (2019). Social impact bonds for a sustainable welfare state: The role of enabling factors. Sustainability, 11(10), 2884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carè, R., Rania, F., & De Lisa, R. (2020). Critical success factors, motivations, and risks in social impact bonds. Sustainability, 12(18), 7291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, E. (2021). More than marketised? Exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 24(1), 78–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Global Development. (2020). Resettlement: The innovative finance for resettlement working group. https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/Using_Innovative_Finance_to_Increase_Refugee_Resettlement.pdf

  • Chiapello, E., & Knoll, L. (2020). The welfare conventions approach: A comparative perspective on social impact bonds. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22(2), 100–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J., Comin, F., & Diaz-Fuentes, D. (2006). Privatization in the European Union: Pragmatic, ideological, inevitable? Journal of European Public Policy, 13(5), 736–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, E. (2017). In the wake of austerity: Social impact bonds and the financialisation of the welfare state in Britain. New Political Economy, 22(3), 294–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmiston, D., & Nicholls, A. (2018). Social impact bonds: The role of private capital in outcome-based commissioning. Journal of Social Policy, 47(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIF. (2020). BNP Paribas and European investment fund launch EUR 10m fund for co-investment into social impact bonds in the EU. https://www.eif.org/what_we_do/equity/news/2020/bnp-efsi.htm?media=rss&language=en

  • European Commission. (2019). EU support for re-integration of Dutch military personnel into the labour market. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_4049

  • European Investment Advisory Hub. (2021). Social outcomes contracting in Europe: An introductory guide to social outcomes contracting in European Union Member States. https://eiah.eib.org/publications/attachments/social-outcomes-contracting-in-Europe-10052021.pdf

  • Fi Compass. (2019). The Portuguese social innovation initiative. https://www.fi-compass.eu/publication/factsheets/factsheet-fi-compass-study-social-impacts-bond-programme-under-portugals.

  • FitzGerald, C., Carter, E., Dixon, R., & Airoldi, M. (2019). Walking the contractual tightrope: A transaction cost economics perspective on social impact bonds. Public Money & Management, 39(7), 458–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C., & Morris, S. (2019). Evaluating outcome-based payment programmes: Challenges for evidence-based policy. Journal of Economic Policy Reform. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1575217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A., Tan, S., Lagarde, M., & Mays, N. (2018). Narratives of promise, narratives of caution: A review of the literature on social impact bonds. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacomantonio, C. (2017). Grant-maximizing but not money-making: A simple decision-tree analysis for social impact bonds. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government Outcomes Lab. (2021). Projects database. https://golab.bsg.ox.ac.uk

  • Gustafsson-Wright, E. & Osborne, S. (2021). Do the benefits outweigh the costs of impact bonds? https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/golab.prod/documents/Do_the_benefits_outweigh_the_costs_of_impact_bonds.pdf

  • Hajer, J. (2020). The national governance and policy context of social impact bond emergence: A comparative analysis of leaders and skeptics. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22(2), 116–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2006). Neo-liberalism as creative destruction. Geografiska Annaler, 88(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Impact Invest Lab. (2020). Le contrat à Impact social de étude de cas d’un contrat à impact social. Impact Invest Lab. https://iilab.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/ETUDE-CAS-IMPACT-SOCIAL-ADIE.pdf

  • Klimavičiūtė L., Chiodo V., De Pieri B., & Gineikytė V. (2021). Study on the benefits of using social outcome contracting in the provision of social services and interventions—a cross—country comparative assessment of evolving good practice in cross-sectoral partnerships for public value creation. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=23801&langId=en

  • Le Pendeven, B. (2019). Social impact bonds: A new public management perspective. Finance Contrôle Stratégie (NS-5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, F., & Meyer, M. (2017). Social Impact Bonds and the perils of aligned interests. Administrative Sciences, 7(3), 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormiston, J., Moran, M., Castellas, E. I., & Tomkinson, E. (2020). Everybody wins? A discourse analysis of competing stakeholder expectations in social impact bonds. Public Money & Management, 40(3), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S., Cordes, J. J., Pandey, S. K., & Winfrey, W. F. (2018). Use of social impact bonds to address social problems: Understanding contractual risks and transaction costs. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 28(4), 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rania, F., Trotta, A., Carè, R., Migliazza, M. C., & Kabli, A. (2020). Social uncertainty evaluation of social impact bonds: A model and practical application. Sustainability, 12(9), 3854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijpens, J., Bouchard, M. J., Gruet, É., & Salathé-Beaulieu, G. (2020). Social impact bonds: Promises versus facts. What does the recent scientific literature tell us? (Working Paper, CIREC 2020/15) Liege University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, R. (2006). Neo-liberalism and the market state: What is the ideal shell? Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerle, T., & Nieveler, A. (2017). Implementing social impact bonds in Germany: Challenges for pay-for-success models in the German welfare system. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323258634_Implementing_Social_Impact_Bonds_in_Germany_-_Challenges_for_Pay-for-Success_Models_in_the_German_Welfare_System

  • Sinclair, S., McHugh, N., & Roy, M. J. (2021). Social innovation, financialisation and commodification: A critique of social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 24(1), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S., Fraser, A., McHugh, N., & Warner, M. E. (2021). Widening perspectives on social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1568249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The French Ministry for the Economy and Finance. (2020). Lancement des contrats à impact. https://www.economie.gouv.fr/lancement-contrats-impact

  • Trotta, A., Carè, R., Caridà, R. & Migliazza, M. C. (2021). Fighting poverty and inequalities through social impact bonds: Learning from case studies to support the Covid-19 response. In Contemporary Issues in Sustainable Finance: Financial Products and Financial Institutions (p. 37). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, A. E., & Warner, M. E. (2020). The razor’s edge: Social impact bonds and the financialization of early childhood services. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(6), 816–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchi, V., & Casalini, F. (2019). Is a social empowerment of PPP for infrastructure delivery possible? Lessons from social impact bonds. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 90(2), 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchi, V., Casalini, F., Cusumano, N. & Leone, V. M. (2021). From traditional to outcome-based public-private partnerships: Social impact bonds. Public Private Partnerships, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J. & Yarrow, G. (1988). Privatization: An economic analysis. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2012, September). Profiting from public value? The case of social impact bonds. Draft paper prepared for Creating Public Value Conference. University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 892293—COPERNICUS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosella Carè .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carè, R. (2022). From New Public Management to Social Impact Bonds: The European Experience. In: Lévy, N., Chommeloux, A., Champroux, N.A., Porion, S., josso, S., Damiens, A. (eds) The Anglo-American Model of Neoliberalism of the 1980s. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12074-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics