Abstract
Dis-/mis-/mal-information are a cause for growing concerns across the world and scholars have been discussing the spread of misinformation around such things as elections, COVID-19 or the climate crisis. They have documented how people across the world are effectively bombarded with misleading messages through various media from social media (e.g. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter or TikTok), private messaging apps (e.g. WhatsApp, WeChat) and broadcast media. This raises the question of how citizens can respond to this? What resources (social, cultural and material) can they draw upon to identify, evaluate and respond to mis-information? This chapter focuses on this question by exploring citizens’ digital and data literacies, especially the social networks (personal and digital) that citizens depend on for support.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrejevic, M. (2014). Big data, big questions: the big data divide. International Journal of Communication, 8(17).
Arora, P. (2019). The next billion users: Digital life beyond the West. Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. Stuart Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 46–58). Oxford University Press.
Carlson, J., & Johnston, L. R. (Eds.). (2015). Data information literacy: Librarians, data, and the education of a new generation of researchers. Purdue University Press.
Carmi, E., Lockley, E., & Yates, S. J. (2022). Inclusive digital focus groups: Methodological challenges of remote interaction with citizens with low digital literacies. In Skopek, J. (ed.), Research handbook on digital sociology. Dublin: Edward Elgar.
Carmi, E., Yates, S. J., Lockley, E., & Pawluczuk, A. (2020). Data citizenship: Rethinking data literacy in the age of disinformation, misinformation, and malinformation. Internet Policy Review, 9(2), 1–22.
Choi, S. (2015). The two-step flow of communication in Twitter-based public forums. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 696–711.
Crusoe, D. (2016). Data Literacy defined pro populo: To read this article, please provide a little information. The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(3).
David, Crusoe (2016) Data Literacy defined pro populo: To read this article please provide a little information. The Journal of Community Informatics 12(3) https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v12i3.3276
Danet, B. (1997). Books, letters, documents: The changing aesthetics of texts in late print culture. Journal of Material Culture, 2(1), 5–38.
Dias, N., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Emphasizing publishers does not effectively reduce susceptibility to misinformation on social media. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(1).
Farkas, J., & Schou, J. (2018). Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. Javnost-The Public, 25(3), 298–314.
Finnegan, R. (1989). Communication and technology. Language & Communication, 9(2-3), 107–127.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Grillenberger, A., & Romeike, R. (2018, October). Developing a theoretically founded data literacy competency model. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education 1–10.
Hilbert, M., Vásquez, J., Halpern, D., Valenzuela, S., & Arriagada, E. (2017). One step, two step, network step? Complementary perspectives on communication flows in Twittered citizen protests. Social Science Computer Review, 35(4), 444–461.
Hintz, A., & Brown, I. (2017). Digital Citizenship and Surveillance| Enabling Digital Citizenship? The Reshaping of Surveillance Policy After Snowden. International Journal of Communication, 11(20).
Hoggart, R. (1957). The uses of literacy. Transaction Publishers.
Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), 61–78.
Mihailidis, P., & Thevenin, B. (2013). Media literacy as a core competency for engaged citizenship in participatory democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1611–1622.
OfCom. (2021). Adults’ media use and attitudes. Available at: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/adults/adults-media-use-and-attitudes
Selwyn, N., & Pangrazio, L. (2018). Doing data differently? Developing personal data tactics and strategies amongst young mobile media users. Big Data & Society, 5(1). 205395171876502-10.1177/2053951718765021
Simon, F. M., & Camargo, C. Q. (2021). Autopsy of a metaphor: The origins, use and blind spots of the ‘infodemic’. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211031908
Soffer, O. (2021). Algorithmic personalization and the two-step flow of communication. Communication Theory, 31(3), 297–315.
Street, B. V., & Street, B. B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Yates, S. J., Kirby, J., & Lockley, E. (2015). Digital media use: Differences and inequalities in relation to class and age. Sociological Research Online, 20(4).
Yates, S. J., & Lockley, E. (2018). Social media and social class. American Behavioural Scientist, 62(9), 1291–1316.
Yates, S. J., & Lockley, E. (2020). Digital engagement and class: Economic, social, and cultural capital in a digital age. In S. J. Yates & R. Rice (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of digital technology and society. Oxford University Press.
Yates, S. J., Carmi, E., Lockley, E., Pawluczuk, A., French, T., & Vincent, S. (2020a). Who are the limited users of digital systems and media? An examination of UK evidence. First Monday, 25(7).
Yates, S. J., Carmi, E., Pawluczuk, A., Lockley, E., Wessels, B., & Gangneux, J. (2020b). Me and My Big Data Report 2020: Understanding citizens’ data literacies: Thinking, doing & participating with our data. University of Liverpool.
Yates, S. J., Carmi, E., Lockley, E., Wessels, B. E., & Pawluczuk, A., (2021). Me and my big data final report: Understanding citizens’ data literacies. Liverpool, UK: University of Liverpool.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
This ‘Me and my big data—developing citizens’ data literacies’ project was funded by The Nuffield Foundation under grant number FR-000021473. The Nuffield Foundation is an independent charitable trust with a mission to advance social well-being. It funds research that informs social policy, primarily in Education, Welfare and Justice. It also funds student programmes that provide opportunities for young people to develop skills in quantitative and scientific methods. The Nuffield Foundation is the founder and co-funder of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics and the Ada Lovelace Institute. The Foundation has funded this project, but the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily the Foundation.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yates, S., Carmi, E. (2023). Citizens’ Networks of Digital and Data Literacy. In: Fowler-Watt, K., McDougall, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Media Misinformation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11976-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11976-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11975-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11976-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)