Abstract
Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) is a rapidly expanding tool to sense vibrations and system deformations in many engineering applications. In terms of site characterization, DAS presents the ability to make static and dynamic strain measurements on a scale (e.g., kilometers), density (e.g., meter-scale), and fidelity (e.g., microstrain) that was previously unattainable with traditional measurement technologies. In this study, we assess the effectiveness of using DAS to extract surface wave dispersion data using the multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) technique. We utilized both highly-controlled, broadband vibroseis shaker truck and more-variable, narrow-band sledgehammer sources to excite the near surface and compared the DAS-derived dispersion data directly with concurrently acquired traditional geophone-derived dispersion data. We report that the differences between the two sensing approaches are minimal and well within the uncertainty bounds associated with each individual measurement for the following DAS testing conditions: (a) a tight-buffered or strain-sensing fiber optic cable is used, (b) the cable is buried in a shallow trench to enhance coupling, and (c) short gauge lengths and small channel separations are used. Our deployed conditions are more promising than previous attempts documented in the literature, thereby demonstrating that DAS can provide accurate measurements of surface wave dispersion data of the same quality as geophones. We show that frequency-dependent normalization of the dispersion image removes the effects of scaling, integration, and differentiation of the measured data, thereby removing the need to post-process the geophone-derived and DAS-derived waveforms into equivalent units before performing dispersion processing. Finally, we summarize the important effect of gauge length on the dispersion data for future reference. This study demonstrates that DAS, when appropriate considerations are made, can be used in-lieu of traditional sensors (i.e., geophones) for making high-quality measurements of surface wave dispersion data using the MASW technique.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dean, T., Cuny, T., Hartog, A.H.: The effect of gauge length on axially incident P-waves measured using fibre optic distributed vibration sensing: Gauge length effect on incident P-waves. Geophys. Prospect. 65, 184–193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12419
Hubbard, P.G., et al.: Road Deformation Monitoring and Event Detection using Asphalt-embedded Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) (2022). https://doi.org/10.31224/osf.io/mer43
Hubbard, P.G., et al.: Dynamic structural health monitoring of a model wind turbine tower using distributed acoustic sensing (DAS). J. Civ. Struct. Heal. Monit. 11(3), 833–849 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-021-00483-y
Karrenbach, M., et al.: Fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing of microseismicity, strain and temperature during hydraulic fracturing. Geophysics 84, D11–D23 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0396.1
Lindsey, N.J., Martin, E.R.: Fiber-Optic Seismology. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 49, 309–336 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-072420-065213
Lindsey, N.J., Yuan, S., Lellouch, A., Gualtieri, L., Lecocq, T., Biondi, B.: City‐scale dark fiber das measurements of infrastructure use during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089931
Park, C.B., Miller, R.D., Xia, J.: Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics 64, 800–808 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444590
Soga, K., Luo, L.: Distributed fiber optics sensors for civil engineering infrastructure sensing. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance 3, 1–21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2018.1426138
Spikes, K.T., Tisato, N., Hess, T.E., Holt, J.W.: Comparison of geophone and surface-deployed distributed acoustic sensing seismic data. Geophysics 84, A25–A29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0528.1
Stokoe, K.H., Cox, B.R., Clayton, P.M., Menq, F.: NHERI@UTexas experimental facility with large-scale mobile shakers for field studies. Front. Built Environ. 6, 575973 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.575973
Vantassel, J.: jpvantassel/swprocess: v0.1.0b0. Zenodo (2021a). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4584129
Vantassel, J.: jpvantassel/swprepost: v1.0.0. Zenodo (2021b). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5646771
Vantassel, J.P., Cox, B.R.: SWprocess: a workflow for developing robust estimates of surface wave dispersion uncertainty. Journal of Seismology Accepted (2022)
Wang, H.F., et al.: Ground motion response to an ML 4.3 earthquake using co-located distributed acoustic sensing and seismometer arrays. Geophys. J. Int. 213, 2020–2036 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy102
Zhang, C.-C., et al.: Microanchored borehole fiber optics allows strain profiling of the shallow subsurface. Sci Rep 11, 9173 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88526-8
Zywicki, D.J., Rix, G.J.: Mitigation of near-field effects for seismic surface wave velocity estimation with cylindrical beamformers. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131, 970–977 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:8(970)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) grants CMMI-2037900, CMMI-1520808, and CMMI-1931162. However, any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. Special thanks to Dr. Kevin Anderson at Austin Water - Center for Environmental Research for the access to the Hornsby Bend Biosolids Management Plant test site. Special thanks to Dr. Kenichi Soga for the contribution of the NanZee cable used in this study. Special thanks to Todd Bown and the OptaSense team for their assistance in configuring the ODH4, extracting and filtering the DAS-derived seismic waveforms, and permitting us to publish these results. Active-source surface wave processing and calculation of dispersion statistics were performed using the Python package swprocess v0.1.0b0 (Vantassel 2021a). Subsequent operations with the dispersion statistics were performed using the Python package swprepost v1.0.0 (Vantassel 2021b).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vantassel, J.P. et al. (2022). Effectiveness of Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Acquiring Surface Wave Dispersion Data Using Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves. In: Wang, L., Zhang, JM., Wang, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022). PBD-IV 2022. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_77
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_77
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11897-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11898-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)