Skip to main content

Abstract

Liquefaction under cyclic loads can be predicted through advanced (liquefaction-capable) material constitutive models. However, such constitutive models have several input parameters whose values are often unknown or imprecisely known, requiring calibration via lab/in-situ test data. This study proposes a Bayesian updating framework that integrates probabilistic calibration of the soil model and probabilistic prediction of lateral spreading due to seismic liquefaction. In particular, the framework consists of three main parts: (1) Parametric study based on global sensitivity analysis, (2) Bayesian calibration of the primary input parameters of the constitutive model, and (3) Forward uncertainty propagation through a computational model simulating the response of a soil column under earthquake loading. For demonstration, the PM4Sand model is adopted, and cyclic strength data of Ottawa F-65 sand from cyclic direct simple shear tests are utilized to calibrate the model. The three main uncertainty analyses are performed using quoFEM, a SimCenter open-source software application for uncertainty quantification and optimization in the field of natural hazard engineering. The results demonstrate the potential of the framework linked with quoFEM to perform calibration and uncertainty propagation using sophisticated simulation models that can be part of a performance-based design workflow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carey, T.J., Kutter, B.L.: Comparison of liquefaction constitutive models for a hypothetical sand. Geotech. Front. 2017, 389–398 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boulanger, R.W., Ziotopoulou, K.: PM4Sand (Version 3.1): A sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, Report UCD/CGM-17/01 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McKenna, F.: OpenSees: a framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Comput. Sci. Eng. 13(4), 58–66 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, L., Arduino, P.: Implementation, verification, and validation of the PM4Sand model in OpenSees. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, USA, Report 2021/02 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ziotopoulou, J., Montgomery, J., Bastidas, A.M.P., Morales, B.: Cyclic Strength of Ottawa F-65 sand: laboratory testing and constitutive model calibration. Geotech. Earthq. Eng. Soil Dyn. 293, 180–189 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ziotopoulou, K., Boulanger, R.W.: Calibration and implementation of a sand plasticity plane-strain model for earthquake engineering applications. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 53, 268–280 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. National Academics of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: State of the Art and Practice in the Assessment of Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction and Its Consequences. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kruschke, J.: Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Bloomington (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mercado, V., et al.: Uncertainty quantification and propagation in the modeling of liquefiable sands. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 123, 217–229 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, L.: Implementation, verification, validation, and application of two constitutive models for earthquake engineering applications. Dissertation, University of Washington (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Adams, B.M., et al.: Dakota, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis: Version 6.13 User’s Manual (No. SAND2020-12495). Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hu, Z., Mahadevan, S.: Probability models for data-driven global sensitivity analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 187, 40–57 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McKenna, F., Zsarnoczay, A., Gardner, M., Elhaddad, W., Yi, S., Aakash, B.S.: NHERI-SimCenter/quoFEM: Version 2.4.0 (v2.4.0). Zenodo (2021). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5558000

  14. Taylor, R.L.: FEAP-A finite element analysis program (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morales, B., Humire, F., Ziotopoulou, K.: Data from: Cyclic Direct Simple Shear Testing of Ottawa F50 and F65 Sands (Feb. 1st, 2021). Distributed by Design Safe-CI Data Depot. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-eahz-9466. Accessed 28 June 2021

  16. Weirs, V.G., et al.: Sensitivity analysis techniques applied to a system of hyperbolic conservation laws. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 107, 157–170 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ching, J., Chen, Y.C.: Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo method for Bayesian model updating, model class selection, and model averaging. J. Eng. Mech. 133(7), 816–832 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Minson, S.E., Simons, M., Beck, J.L.: Bayesian inversion for finite fault earthquake source models I—theory and algorithm. Geophys. J. Int. 194(3), 1701–1726 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. (1612843 & 2131111). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aakash Bangalore Satish .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Satish, A.B., Yi, Sr., Nair, A.S., Arduino, P. (2022). Probabilistic Calibration and Prediction of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Using quoFEM. In: Wang, L., Zhang, JM., Wang, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022). PBD-IV 2022. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_152

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics