Skip to main content

Breaking the “Class” Ceiling: The Challenges and Opportunities of Creating a Digital Archive of Edwardian Working-Class Book Inscriptions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Digital and Public Humanities

Abstract

Book inscriptions are an important example of “ordinary writing” that have the potential to reshape current understandings of working-class life in Edwardian Britain (1901–1914). Nonetheless, due to historical bias in collection policies and the perceived value of working-class writing, books containing these marks tend to survive largely outside of official institutions of power. Furthermore, when examples exist in libraries and archives, they tend to be scant and undocumented and, thus, are difficult to find. Without some form of intervention, these inscriptions face endangerment and entire narratives of working-class culture and history risk being eradicated. Digital preservation offers an important way to safeguard these inscriptions and make them available on a large scale. However, there are a number of challenges that prevent or hinder the possibility. This paper explores some of these difficulties and suggests ways in which they can be overcome in order to give a permanent voice to the voiceless and break the “class” ceiling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barton, David, and Uta Papen. 2010. The Anthropology of Writing. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordalejo, Barbara. 2018. “Minority Report: The Myth of Equality in Digital Humanities.” In Bodies of Information: Intersectional Feminism and Digital Humanities, edited by Elizabeth Losh and Jacqueline Wernimont, 320–43. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourg, Chris. 2018. “The Library Is Never Neutral.” In Disrupting the Digital Humanities, edited by Dorothy Kim and Jesse Stommel, 455–72. Goleta CA: Punctum Books.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, Michelle. 2017. “Identifying and Dismantling White Supremacy in Archives.” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 87 (3): 222–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, Michelle, Christopher Harter, and Jules Bergis. 2017. “Diversifying the Digital Historical Record: Integrating Community Archives in National Strategies for Access to Digital Cultural Heritage.” D-Lib Magazine 23: 5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, B. 2019. Bookbarn grows sales of real books by extending global reach and local connections, Business Leader, https://www.businessleader.co.uk/bookbarn-grows-sales-of-real-books-by-extending-global-reach-andlocal-connections/. Accessed 2 August 2022.

  • Dunk, Thomas W. 2003. It’s a Working Man’s Town: Male Working-Class Culture. Montreal: McGill Queen’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earhart, Amy E. 2012. “Can Information Be Unfettered? Race and the New Digital Humanities Canon.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold. Available at https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-88c11800-9446-469b-a3be-3fdb36bfbd1e/section/cf0af04d-73e3-4738-98d9-74c1ae3534e5#ch18. Accessed 8 July 2021.

  • Edwards, Elizabeth. 2004. “Little Theatres of Self: Thinking about the Social.” In We Are the People, edited by Tom Phillips, 26–41. London: National Portrait Gallery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estill, Laura. 2019. “Digital Humanities’ Shakespeare Problem.” Humanities 8 (1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/h8010045. Accessed 8 July 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezell, Margaret J. M. 2010. “Editing Early Modern Women’s Manuscripts: Theory, Electronic Editions, and the Accidental Copy-Text.” Literature Compass 7 (2): 102–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, Andrew. 2007. “Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 28 (2): 151–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, Andrew, Mary Stevens, and Elizabeth Shepherd. 2009. “Whose Memories, Whose Archives? Independent Community Archives, Autonomy and the Mainstream.” Archival Science 9 (1–2): 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallon, Kim. 2016. “Making a Case for the Black Digital Humanities.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, edited by Matthew K. Gold and Lauren F. Klein, 42–49. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Nigel, and Julia Gillen. 2010. “Edwardian Postcards: Illuminating Ordinary Writing.” In The Anthropology of Writing, edited by David Barton and Uta Papen, 169–89. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgin, Tanner. 2010. Cultural Politics, Critique and the Digital Humanities. Blog Post, May 25. Available at https://www.tannerhiggin.com/2010/05/cultural-politics-critique-and-the-digital-humanities/. Accessed 8 July 2021.

  • Hitchcock, Tim. 2004. “A New History from Below.” History Workshop Journal 57: 294–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Kiana. 2018. “The Pedagogical Value of Provenance Research in Rare Books and Cultural Heritage Collections.” Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America 37: 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillis, Theresa. 2013. The Sociolinguistics of Writing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Alan. 2020. “Toward a Diversity Stack: Digital Humanities and Diversity as Technical Problem.” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 135 (1): 130–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losh, Elizabeth, and Jacqueline Wernimont. 2018. Bodies of Information: Intersectional Feminism and Digital Humanities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveday, Vic. 2014. “‘Flat-Capping It’: Memory, Nostalgia and Value in Retroactive Male Working-Class Identification.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 17 (6): 721–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, Martyn. 2010. “A New History from Below? The Writing Culture of Ordinary People in Europe.” History Australia 7 (3): 59.1–59.9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, Martyn. 2013. The Writing Culture of Ordinary People in Europe, c. 18601920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, Simon. 2018. “Cultural Diversity and the Digital Humanities.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 11: 371–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGann, Jerome. 2005. “Culture and Technology: The Way we Live Now, What Is to Be Done?” New Literary History 36 (1): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKitterick, David. 2009. “Introduction.” In The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain: Volume 6, 1830–1914, edited by David McKitterick, 1–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, Lauren Alex. 2020a. “Introduction: Ordinary Writing and Rebellion.” In Rebellious Writing: Marginalised Edwardians and the Contestation of Power, edited by Lauren Alex O’Hagan, 1–46. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, Lauren Alex. 2020b. “Rethinking the Book Inscription as a Site of Class Struggle.” In Rebellious Writing: Marginalised Edwardians and the Contestation of Power, edited by Lauren Alex O’Hagan, 201–37. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, Lauren Alex. 2020c. “A Voice for the Voiceless: Improving Provenance Practice for Working-Class Books.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 53 (1): 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam. 2020. Oxfam Annual Reports and Accounts 2019/20. Available at https://www.oxfam.org.uk/documents/264/Oxfam_GB_Annual_Report_2020.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2021.

  • Phillips, Tom. 2004. “Introduction.” In We Are the People, edited by Tom Phillips, 14–26. London: National Portrait Gallery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, Claire Bond. 2013. “Thou Shalt Commit: The Internet, New Media, and the Future of Women’s History.” Journal of Women’s History 25 (4): 350–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Jennifer. 2019. Voices and Books in the English Renaissance: A New History of Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Risam, Roopika. 2015. “Beyond the Margins: Intersectionality and the Digital Humanities.” English Faculty Publications, Paper 4. http://digitalcommons.salemstate.edu/english_facpub/4. Accessed 8 July 2021.

  • Risam, Roopika. 2018. “Decolonizing the Digital Humanities in Theory and Practice.” English Faculty Publications, Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.salemstate.edu/english_facpub/7. Accessed 8 July 2021.

  • Ruberg, Bonnie, Jason Boyd, and James Howe. 2018. “Toward a Queer Digital Humanities.” In Bodies of Information: Intersectional Feminism and Digital Humanities, edited by Elizabeth Losh and Jacqueline Wernimont, 108–28. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, Maura. 2013. “The Neoliberal Library.” In Information Literacy and Social Justice: Radical Professional Praxis, edited by Shana Higgins and Lua Gregory, 39–61. Sacramento, CA: Library Juice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinor, Jennifer. 2002. The Extraordinary Work of Ordinary Writing: Annie Ray’s Diary. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Jo, and Patricia Holland. 1991. Family Snaps: The Meaning of Domestic Photography. London: Virago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, Tonia. 2017. “Archival Amnesty: In Search of Black American Transitional and Restorative Justice.” Journal of Critical Library and Information Services 1 (2): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.42. Accessed 8 July 2021.

  • Thomas, Julia. 2017. Nineteenth-Century Illustration and the Digital: Studies in Word and Image. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. 1966. “History from Below.” Times Literary Supplement, April 7, 279–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Selina. 2015. The People: The Rise and Fall of the Working Class, 1910–1920. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, Howard. 1977. “Secrecy, Archives, and the Public Interest.” MidWestern Archivist 2 (2): 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren Alex O’Hagan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

O’Hagan, L.A. (2022). Breaking the “Class” Ceiling: The Challenges and Opportunities of Creating a Digital Archive of Edwardian Working-Class Book Inscriptions. In: Schwan, A., Thomson, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Digital and Public Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11886-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics