Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Speak to be Heard”: Women and Deliberative Democracy in the Ugandan Parliament

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy and Africanness

Abstract

While parliament and other political deliberative structures have always been the preserve of men, women have nonetheless slowly entrenched into the arena. Even then, they still face discrimination not only in their descriptive representation but also in their substantive participation. Even in pro-women legislation, the inequality in relation to women’s voices is evident during deliberations in parliament. This chapter therefore adopts a qualitative and descriptive research design that includes the content analysis of the Domestic Violence Bill 2010 and interviews with Ugandan parliamentarians who participated in the parliamentary era when the bill was deliberated upon. Using the deliberative democratic theory, this chapter studies and analyses the deliberative behaviour of women parliamentarians in the Uganda parliament. The findings reveal that whereas women parliamentarians used several strategies such as continuous education and capacity building to enhance their confidence and self-esteem during deliberative sessions, women’s voices are often silenced both passively and actively by powerful male voices, and women parliamentarians must constantly and consciously navigate the patriarchal attitude and androcentric nature of parliament to get their voice heard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahikire, J. (2004). Towards women’s effective participation in electoral processes: A review of the Ugandan experience. Feminist Africa, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballington, J., & Karam, A. (2005). Women in parliament: Beyond numbers. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhalotra, S., Clots-Figueras, I., & Iyer, L. (2015). Path-breakers? Women’s electoral success and future political participation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boboc-Cojocaru, A. (2011). Contribution of feminism to the deliberative democracy concept of evolution. Philosophy, Social and Human Disciplines, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, A. (2009). Gender and governance: Overview report (pp. 1–82).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgaria, S. (2008). Accountability and voice for service delivery at the local level (UNDP regional training event developing capacities for accountability and voice) (pp. 1–27). United Nations Development Programme and IDL Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castilejo, C. (2009). Women’s political participation and influence in Sierra Leone (pp. 1–32). FRIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K. (2008). Substantive representation of women (and improving it) what it and should it be about? American Political Science Association, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, P. (2006). Critical mass, deliberation, and the substantive representation of women: Evidence from the UK’s devolution Programme. Political Studies, 54(4), 691–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00633.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S. (2004). A feminised style of politics? Women MPS in the house of commons. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6, 3–19. http://www.web.pdx.edu/~mev/pdf/Childs.pdf

  • Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2008). Critical mass theory and women’s political representation. Political Studies, 56, 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00712.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, S., & Lovenduski, J. (2012). Political representation. In The Oxford handbook of gender and politics (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., & Goetz, A. M. (2005). Democratizing democracy: Feminist perspectives. Democratization, 12(5), 783–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domingo, P., Holmes, R., O’Neil, T., Jones, N., Bird, K., & Larson, A. (2015). Women’s voice and leadership in decision-making assessing the evidence. Overseas Development Institute (ODI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dysart, S. (1994, Autumn). Barriers to Women’s participation in parliament (pp. 12–14). Canadian Parliamentary Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481–517. http://sfonline.barnard.edu/sfxxx/documents/gilligan.pdf

  • Goold, S. D., Neblo, M. A., Kim, S. Y. H., Vries, R. D., Rowe, G., & Muhlberger, P. (2012). What is good public deliberation. Hasting Center, 24–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.29

  • Grunenfelder, R., & Bachtiger, A. (2007). Gendered deliberation? How men and women deliberate in legislatures. Advanced Empirical Study of Deliberation, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hickerson, A., & Gastil, J. (2008). Assessing the difference critique of deliberation: Gender, emotion, and the jury experience. Communication Theory, 18, 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00323.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., Norris, P., & Welzel, C. (2004). Gender equality and democracy.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPU. (2021). Uganda Parliament. Inter-Parliamentary Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadaga, A. R. (2013). Women’s political leadership in East Africa with specific reference to Uganda. Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation (1993rd ed.). Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpowitz, C. F., & Mendelberg, T. (2014). The silent sex: Gender, deliberation, and institutions. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karpowitz, C. F., Mendelberg, T., & Shaker, L. (2012). Gender inequality in deliberative participation. American Political Science Review, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000329

  • Manin, B. (2005). Deliberation: Why we should focus on debate rather than discussion. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markham, S. (2012). Strengthening women’s roles in parliament. Parliamentary Affairs, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss024

  • Markham, S. (2013). Women as agents of change: Having voice in society and influencing policy (No. 5; Women’s voice, agency and participation research series) (pp. 1–20). World Bank Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelberg, T. (2013). Political deliberation. In Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelberg, T., Karpowitz, C. F., & Oliphant, J. B. (2014). Gender inequality in deliberation: Unpacking the Black Box of interaction. Perspectives on Politics, 12(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713003691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1861). Considerations on representative government. Parker, Son and Boum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mushemeza, E. D. (2009). Contribution of women in influencing legislation and policy formulation in Uganda (1995–2005). Africa Development, XXXIV(3 & 4), 167–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musisi, N. B. (1992). Colonial and missionary education: Women and domesticity in Uganda, 1900–1945. In African encounters with domesticity. Rutgers University Press..

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzee, H., & Endeley, J. B. M. É. (2019). “Sister Robert, sister John”: Enhancing women’s voices and gendered membership of the Uganda Women Parliamentary Association. Agenda, 33(2), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2019.1615781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, T., Foresti, M., & Hudson, A. (2007). Evaluation of citizen’s voice and accountability: Review of the Literature & Donor Approaches Report (pp. 1–78).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P., Kunovich, S., & Hughes, M. M. (2007). Gender in politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, F., & Chen, P. C. B. (2013). Gender and public talk: Accounting for WOMEN’S variable participation in the public sphere. Sociological Theory, 31(4), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113515172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refki, D., Abbas, D., Avic, B., Kim, E., Berger, L., Faerman, S., & Akullo, E. (2014). Mapping the substantive representation of women in the Ugandan parliament (pp. 1–32). Center for Women in government and civil society, Rockeller College of Public Affairs and Policy, University of Albany, State University of New York, Nkumba University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. W. (2007). Rethinking the limits of democratic deliberation: The limits and potential of citizen participation. Polity, 39(3), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz-Ziv, M. (2015). Gender and board activeness: The role of a critical mass. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1868033

  • Simpson, R., & Lewis, P. (2007). Voice, visibility, and the gendering of organisations. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siu, A. (2017). Deliberation and the challenge of inequality. The American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 146(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, J., Bachtiger, A., Sporndli, M., & Steenbergen, M. (2004). Deliberative politics in action: Analysing parliamentary discourse. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring Deliberation’s content: A coding scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1), 1–37. http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol3/iss1/art12

  • Studlar, D. T., & McAllister, I. (2001). Does a critical mass exist? A comparative analysis of Women’s legislative representation 1949–1997. American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamale, S. (1999). When hens begin to crow: Gender and parliamentary politics in Uganda. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, R. (1989). Liberal Feminism. In Feminist thought: A comprehensive introduction (pp. 11–38). Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, A. M. (2000). Women & politics in Uganda. The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschentsher, A., Bachtiger, A., Steiner, J., & Steenbergen, M. (2009). Deliberation in parliament: Research objectives and preliminary results of the Bern Center for Interdisciplinary Deliberation Studies (BIDS). Legisprudence “Legislation and Argumentation”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutui, V. (2015). Theoretical models of deliberative democracy: A critical analysis. Argumentum. Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric, 13(2), 179–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • UBOS. (2017). Women and men in Uganda facts and figures 2016 (p. 94). Uganda Bureau of Statistics. https://www.ubos.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/06_2018women_and__men_in_uganda_FF2016.pdf

  • Urbinati, N. (2000). Representation as advocacy: A study of democratic deliberation. Political Theory, 28(6), 758–786. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591700028006003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetten, L. (2016). Political representation makes women’s voices heard? Lessons from South Africa. Feminist Dialogue Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waylen, G. (2015). Gender, institutions, and the quality of democracy: Engendering the “Crisis of Democracy”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolbrecht, C., & Campbell, D. E. (2007). Leading by example: Female members of parliament as political role models. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 921–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for African Studies, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Hannah Muzee

Authors
  1. Hannah Muzee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for African Studies, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Hannah Muzee

  2. Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon

    Tata Emmanuel Sunjo

  3. Politics and International Studies, University of Zululand, Empangeni, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

    Andrew Osehi Enaifoghe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Muzee, H. (2022). “Speak to be Heard”: Women and Deliberative Democracy in the Ugandan Parliament. In: Muzee, H., Sunjo, T.E., Enaifoghe, A.O. (eds) Democracy and Africanness. Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11248-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11248-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11247-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11248-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation