Skip to main content

Assessing the Environmental Aspects of Road Network Resiliency

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Architecture, Engineering and Technology

Abstract

Evaluating road networks’ performance during and after a disruption and/or malfunction is of great importance. The performance of the road networks includes four concepts: reliability, vulnerability, robustness, and resilience. Among these concepts, the concept of resilience, which evaluates the road network’s performance after a disruption/malfunction, is very significant. On the other hand, given that the road network is one of the primary sources of air pollution and plays a crucial role in urban sustainability, the amount of polluted emission should be considered in road network performance (resilience) analysis. The literature presents several measures such as travel time, queue length, recovery time, network’s total cost, etc., to study road network resiliency. A review of previous studies demonstrates that the number of studies that considered environmental aspects in road network resiliency evaluation is scarce. Therefore, in this study, new network resilience measures that consider environmental factors are presented. These new measures show how the amount of polluted emission will change when a disruption occurs in the road network. After introducing and defining these new environmental resiliency measures, the Sioux Falls road network is simulated as the case study in Aimsun. The Sioux Falls road network (based on new resiliency measures) is evaluated when the speed of links (sections) is reduced randomly. The London Emission Model (LEM) is used for estimating the amount of polluted emission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aghababaei, M. T., Costello, S. B., & Ranjitkar, P. (2020). Assessing operational performance of New Zealand’s South Island road network after the 2016 Kaikoura Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 101553.

    Google Scholar 

  • AIMSUN Version 8.4 User's Manual, (2018). TSS-Transport Simulation Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balal, E., Valdez, G., Miramontes, J., & Cheu, R. L. (2019). Comparative evaluation of measures for urban highway network resilience due to traffic incidents. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 8(3), 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabani, B. B., Sgambi, L., Garavaglia, E., & Madani, N. (2021). Modeling methods for the assessment of the ecological impacts of road maintenance sites. In Environmental Sustainability and Economy, (pp. 171–193). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W. A., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, S. C., & Snelder, M. (2018). A methodology for road traffic resilience analysis and review of related concepts. Transportmetrica a: Transport Science, 14(1–2), 130–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Rashidy, R. A. H. (2014). The resilience of road transport networks redundancy, vulnerability and mobility characteristics (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganin, A. A., Kitsak, M., Marchese, D., Keisler, J. M., Seager, T., & Linkov, I. (2017). Resilience and efficiency in transportation networks. Science Advances, 3(12), e1701079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, P., Furno, A., & El Faouzi, N. E. (2018). Road network resilience: How to identify critical links subject to day-to-day disruptions. Transportation Research Record, 2672(1), 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamga, C. N., Mouskos, K. C., & Paaswell, R. E. (2011). A methodology to estimate travel time using dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) under incident conditions. Transportation Research Part c: Emerging Technologies, 19(6), 1215–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaviani, A., Thompson, R. G., & Rajabifard, A. (2017). Improving regional road network resilience by optimised traffic guidance. Transportmetrica a: Transport Science, 13(9), 794–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, L. J., Morlok, E. K., & Pierskalla, W. P. (1975). An efficient approach to solving the road network equilibrium traffic assignment problem. Transportation Research, 9(5), 309–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lhomme, S., Serre, D., Diab, Y., & Laganier, R. (2013). Analyzing resilience of urban networks: A preliminary step towards more flood resilient cities. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(2), 221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., & Song, Z. (2020). Review of studies on the resilience of urban critical infrastructure networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 193, 106617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. (1955). Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology, 36(3), 533–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels, T., Chang, S., Cole, D., Mikawoz, J., & Longstaff, H. (2008). Fostering resilience to extreme events within infrastructure systems: Characterizing decision contexts for mitigation and adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 18(2), 310–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Tuite, P. M. (2006). A comparison of transportation network resilience under simulated system optimum and user equilibrium conditions. In Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference, (pp. 1398–1405). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NCHRP). (2004). Traffic data collection, analysis, and forecasting for mechanistic pavement design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13781.

  • Omer, M., Mostashari, A., & Nilchiani, R. (2013). Assessing resilience in a regional road-based transportation network. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 13(4), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil, G. R., & Bhavathrathan, B. K. (2016). Effect of traffic demand variation on road network resilience. Advances in Complex Systems 19(01n02):1650003

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A., & Krausmann, E. (2013). An economic framework for the development of a resilience index for business recovery. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 5, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scope, D. (2015). Transportation system resilience to extreme weather and climate change. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sgambi, L., Jacquin, T., Basso, N., & Garavaglia, E., (2020). The robustness of infrastructure network assessed through a probabilistic flow model and a static traffic assignment algorithm—the case of the Belgian road network. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management (IABMAS 2020) Hokkaido, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang, W. (2016). Robustness and resilience analysis of urban road networks, Imperial College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, W., Bocchini, P., & Davison, B. D. (2018). Resilience metrics and measurement methods for transportation infrastructure: The state of the art. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 5(3), 168–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twumasi-Boakye, R., & Sobanjo, J. (2019). Civil infrastructure resilience: State-of-the-art on transportation network systems. Transportmetrica a: Transport Science, 15(2), 455–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tympakianaki, A., Koutsopoulos, H. N., Jenelius, E., & Cebecauer, M. (2018). Impact analysis of transport network disruptions using multimodal data: A case study for tunnel closures in Stockholm. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(2), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Miller-Hooks, E., & Denny, K. (2015). Assessing the role of network topology in transportation network resilience. Journal of Transport Geography, 46, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behzad Bamdad Mehrabani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mehrabani, B.B., Sgambi, L., Madani, N. (2022). Assessing the Environmental Aspects of Road Network Resiliency. In: Altan, H., et al. Advances in Architecture, Engineering and Technology . Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11232-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics