Skip to main content

Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (Clubfoot)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Orthopaedics for the Newborn and Young Child
  • 661 Accesses

Abstract

Isolated congenital idiopathic talipes equinovarus (TEV), or clubfoot, is the most common foot anomaly that involves all the tissues below the knee. It occurs in 1–2 out of 1000 live births. It is recognized on initial physical exam by the lower extremity’s classic position with the hindfoot in equinus (plantarflexed) and varus (inverted) and the forefoot in cavus (high arch) with adductus of the forefoot. The standard of care for initial management is the Ponseti method which involves serial manipulation and casting followed by Achilles tendon release. Nonadherence to the bracing regimen plays a major role in recurrence of the deformity. The majority of affected children have excellent long-term outcomes, though some children will need additional surgeries for recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wynne-Davies R. Family studies and aetiology of club foot. J Med Genet. 1965;2(4):227–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smythe T, Kuper H, Macleod D, Foster A, Lavy C. Birth prevalence of congenital talipes equinovarus in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tropical Med Int Health. 2017;22(3):269–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz FR, Cole WG, Tosi LL, et al. A search for the gene(s) predisposing to idiopathic clubfoot. Clin Genet. 2005;67(4):361–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cartlidge IJ. Club foot in the Polynesian: an epidemiological survey. N Z Med J. 1983;96(735):515–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang HY, Chung CS, Nemechek RW. A genetic analysis of clubfoot in Hawaii. Genet Epidemiol. 1987;4(4):299–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dobbs MB, Gurnett CA. Genetics of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2012;21(1):7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wynne-Davies R. Genetic and environmental factors in the etiology of talipes equinovarus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;84:9–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Engell V, Damborg F, Andersen M, Kyvik KO, Thomsen K. Club foot: a twin study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(3):374–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ponseti IV. Congenital clubfoot: fundamentals of treatment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wynne-Davies R. Talipes equinovarus: a review of eighty-four cases after completion of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1964;46:464–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ippolito E, Ponseti IV. Congenital club foot in the human fetus. A histological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(1):8–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hootnick DR, Levinsohn EM, Crider RJ, Packard DS. Congenital arterial malformations associated with clubfoot. A report of two cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;167:160–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Merrill LJ, Gurnett CA, Siegel M, Sonavane S, Dobbs MB. Vascular abnormalities correlate with decreased soft tissue volumes in idiopathic clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(5):1442–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Moore CA. Family history, maternal smoking, and clubfoot: an indication of a gene-environment interaction. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(7):658–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang JH, Palmer RM, Chung CS. The role of major gene in clubfoot. Am J Hum Genet. 1988;42(5):772–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Alvarado DM, Aferol H, McCall K, et al. Familial isolated clubfoot is associated with recurrent chromosome 17q23.1q23.2 microduplications containing TBX4. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;87(1):154–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weymouth KS, Blanton SH, Powell T, Patel CV, Savill SA, Hecht JT. Functional assessment of clubfoot associated HOXA9, TPM1, and TPM2 variants suggests a potential gene regulation mechanism. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(7):1726–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Little DG, Aiona MD. Limb length discrepancy in congenital talipes equinovarus. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65(6):409–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shimode K, Miyagi N, Majima T, Yasuda K, Minami A. Limb length and girth discrepancy of unilateral congenital clubfeet. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14(4):280–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Isaacs H, Handelsman JE, Badenhorst M, Pickering A. The muscles in club foot—a histological histochemical and electron microscopic study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1977;59-B(4):465–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahan ST, Yazdy MM, Kasser JR, Werler MM. Is it worthwhile to routinely ultrasound screen children with idiopathic clubfoot for hip dysplasia? J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(8):847–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Paton RW, Choudry QA, Jugdey R, Hughes S. Is congenital talipes equinovarus a risk factor for pathological dysplasia of the hip?: a 21-year prospective, longitudinal observational study. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(11):1553–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Flynn JM, Donohoe M, Mackenzie WG. An independent assessment of two clubfoot-classification systems. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(3):323–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Diméglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P, Mazeau P, Bonnet F. Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4(2):129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharon-Weiner M, Sukenik-Halevy R, Tepper R, Fishman A, Biron-Shental T, Markovitch O. Diagnostic accuracy, work-up, and outcomes of pregnancies with clubfoot detected by prenatal sonography. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(8):754–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Faldini C, Fenga D, Sanzarello I, Nanni M, Traina F, Rosa MAA. Prenatal diagnosis of clubfoot: a review of current available methodology. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2017;59(3):247–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ponseti IV. Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(3):448–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zmurko MG, Belkoff SM, Herzenberg JE. Mechanical evaluation of a soft cast material. Orthopedics. 1997;20(8):693–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Coss HS, Hennrikus WL. Parent satisfaction comparing two bandage materials used during serial casting in infants. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17(8):483–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldstein RY, Seehausen DA, Chu A, Sala DA, Lehman WB. Predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015;35(4):395–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dobbs MB, Rudzki JR, Purcell DB, Walton T, Porter KR, Gurnett CA. Factors predictive of outcome after use of the Ponseti method for the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(1):22–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zionts LE, Dietz FR. Bracing following correction of idiopathic clubfoot using the Ponseti method. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(8):486–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zionts LE, Sangiorgio SN, Cooper SD, Ebramzadeh E. Does clubfoot treatment need to begin as soon as possible? J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(6):558–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sala DA, Chu A, Lehman WB, van Bosse HJ. Achievement of gross motor milestones in children with idiopathic clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(1):55–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Noonan KJ, Richards BS. Nonsurgical management of idiopathic clubfoot. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(6):392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Adegbehingbe OO, Adetiloye AJ, Adewole L, et al. Ponseti method treatment of neglected idiopathic clubfoot: preliminary results of a multi-center study in Nigeria. World J Orthop. 2017;8(8):624–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ayana B, Klungsøyr PJ. Good results after Ponseti treatment for neglected congenital clubfoot in Ethiopia. A prospective study of 22 children (32 feet) from 2 to 10 years of age. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(6):641–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Digge V, Desai J, Das S. Expanded age indication for Ponseti method for correction of congenital idiopathic talipes equinovarus: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57(1):155–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa A. Bent .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Should say Video of percutaneous achilles tenotomy. Used with permission of the Children’s Orthopaedic Center, Los Angeles (MP4 12702 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bent, M.A. (2023). Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (Clubfoot). In: Sarwark, J.F., Carl, R.L. (eds) Orthopaedics for the Newborn and Young Child. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11136-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11136-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11135-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11136-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics