Skip to main content

Hick’s Theory of Religion and a Muslim View on the Inclusivist Option

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
John Hick's Religious Pluralism in Global Perspective

Abstract

It is argued that Hick’s theory of religion does not logically preclude non-pluralist responses to religious diversity. This contention has been overlooked in discussions of Hick’s thought. The implication is that one who accepts Hick’s theory is free to explore alternatives to religious pluralism. I gesture at some Islamic scriptural resources that may inspire a committed Muslim fond of Hick’s theory to seek an alternative to religious pluralism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Compare P2 with Swinburne’s (2004, 303) ‘Principle of Credulity’ and Alston’s (1991) argument for the prima facie rationality of basing beliefs on religious experience.

  2. 2.

    This is similar to Hick’s (2004, 102) own assessment of Swinburne’s (1979) argument for the existence of God where he criticises the qualitative judgements involved to be too vague.

References

  • Alston, William P. 1991. Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, Gerald. 2021. The History of Christianity in Britain and Ireland: From the First Century to the Twenty-First. London: Apollos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Callum G. 2001. The Death of Christian Britain. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Religion and Society in Twentieth-Century Britain. Harlow (UK) & New York: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, Peter. 1995. Prolegomena to Religious Pluralism: Reference and Realism in Religion. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn-Sherbok, Dan. 1986. Ranking Religions. Religious Studies 22 (3–4): 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Costa, Gavin. 1986. Theology and Religious Pluralism: The Challenge of Other Religions. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastmalchian, Amir. 2009. Religious Ambiguity in Hick’s Religious Pluralism. The International Journal of Hekmat 1 (Autumn): 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Swinburne on the Atonement: Reflections on Philosophical Theology and Religious Dialogue. Journal of Inter-Religious Dialogue 10: 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, John. 1981. On Grading Religions. Religious Studies 17 (4): 451–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Problems of Religious Pluralism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. The Possibility of Religious Pluralism: A Reply to Gavin D’Costa. Religious Studies 33 (June): 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. An Autobiography. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent. 2nd ed. Houndmills (Hants.) and New York (NY): Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. The Next Step Beyond Dialogue. In The Myth of Religious Superiority: Multifaith Explorations of Religious Pluralism, ed. Paul F. Knitter, 3–12. Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Religious Pluralism. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion, ed. Chad Meister and Paul Copan, 216–225. Abingdon (Oxon) and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Dialogues in the Philosophy of Religion. 2nd ed. Houndmills (Hants.) & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa, Noriaki. 2011. Grading Religions. Sophia 50: 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legenhausen, Muhammad. 2006. A Muslim’s Proposal: Non-Reductive Religious Pluralism. http://www.uibk.ac.at/theol/leseraum/texte/626.html.

  • Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir. 2003. Ḥayāt Al-Qulūb: Stories of the Prophets. Translated by Sayyid Athar Husayn S. H. Rizvi. Vol. 1. Qum: Ansarian Publications. http://www.al-islam.org/hayat-al-qulub-vol1-allamah-muhammad-baqir-al-majlisi/.

  • McKim, Robert. 2008. On Religious Ambiguity. Religious Studies 44: 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412508009621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muḥammad ibn Ḥibbān al-Bustī. 2012. Al-Taqāsīm Wa-l-Anwāʾ. Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm. https://shamela.ws/book/537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. 2015. The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections, 2010–2050. Washington, D.C. https://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050.

  • Quli Qara’i, Ali. 2004. The Quran: With a Phrase-by-Phrase English Translation. London: ICAS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Race, Alan. 1983. Christians and Religious Pluralism: Patterns in the Christian Theology of Religions. 1st ed. London: SCM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. 2005. Exclusivism, Inclusivism, Pluralism: The Tripolar Typology—Clarified and Reaffirmed. In Myth of Religious Superiority: Multifaith Explorations of Religious Pluralism, ed. Paul F. Knitter, 13–27. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, Richard G. 1979. The Existence of God. 1st ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. The Existence of God. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Keith. 1990. Truth and the Diversity of Religions. Religious Studies 26 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yandell, Keith. 2007. Religious Traditions and Rational Assessments. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion, ed. Chad Meister and Paul Copan, 204–215. Abingdon (Oxon) and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dastmalchian, A. (2023). Hick’s Theory of Religion and a Muslim View on the Inclusivist Option. In: Sugirtharajah, S. (eds) John Hick's Religious Pluralism in Global Perspective. Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11008-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics