Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New Robots and How this has Changed Operative Technique in Renal Cancer Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic Surgery for Renal Cancer

Part of the book series: Management of Urology ((MU))

Abstract

Since the 1990s, laparoscopic surgery has undergone unprecedented change and expansion. The benefit and attraction of minimally invasive surgery to both patients and surgeons alike forced this growth and a necessity to perform more and more complex operations laparoscopically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rukstalis DB, Chodak GW. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a patient with stage 1 testicular carcinoma. J Urol. 1992;148:1907–9; discussion 1909–1910.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berkman DS, Taneja SS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and outcomes. Curr Urol Rep. 2010;11:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M: From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int. 2011;108:1708–13; discussion 1714.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McGuinness LA, Prasad Rai B. Robotics in urology. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100:38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004;239:14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanna T, Imber C. Robotics in HPB surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100:31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cwach K, Kavoussi L. Past, present, and future of laparoscopic renal surgery. Investig Clin Urol. 2016;57:S110–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Babbar P, Hemal AK. Robot-assisted urologic surgery in 2010—advancements and future outlook. Urol Ann. 2011;3:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pal RP, Koupparis AJ. Expanding the indications of robotic surgery in urology: a systematic review of the literature. Arab J Urol. 2018;16:270–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finkelstein J, Eckersberger E, Sadri H, Taneja SS, Lepor H, Djavan B. Open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: the European and US experience. Rev Urol. 2010;12:35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ishii H, Rai BP, Stolzenburg JU, Bose P, Chlosta PL, Somani BK, Nabi G, Qazi HA, Rajbabu K, Kynaston H, et al. Robotic or open radical cystectomy, which is safer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Endourol. 2014;28:1215–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. George E, Brand T, LaPorta A, Marescaux J, Satava R. Origins of robotic surgery: from Skepticism to standard of care. JSLS: J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2018;22:e2018.00039.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Satava RM. Robotic surgery: from past to future–a personal journey. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83(1491–1500):xii.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Azizian M, Liu M, Khalaji I, Sorger J, Oh D, Daimios S. 3—The da Vinci Surgical System. In: Abedin-Nasab, editor. Handbook of robotic and image-guided surgery. MH: Elsevier;2020. p. 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814245-5.00003-7.

  15. Satava RM. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12:6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Intuitive History on World Wide Web. https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/about-us/company/history.

  17. Takács Á, Nagy D, Rudas I, Haidegger T. Origins of surgical robotics: from space to the operating room. 2016;13:13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Damle A, Damle RN, Flahive JM, Schlussel AT, Davids JS, Sturrock PR, Maykel JA, Alavi K. Diffusion of technology: trends in robotic-assisted colorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 2017;214:820–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wirth GJ, Hauser J, Caviezel A, Schwartz J, Fleury N, Tran SN, Iselin CE. Roboterassistierte Operationen in der Urologie. Urologe. 2008;47:960–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanzly M, Frederick A, Creighton T, Atwood K, Mehedint D, Kauffman EC, Kim HL, Schwaab T. Learning curves for robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2015;29:297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, Blute ML, Babineau D, Colombo JR Jr, Frank I, Permpongkosol S, Weight CJ, Kaouk JH, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol. 2007;178:41–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang DY, Monn MF, Bahler CD, Sundaram CP. Does robotic assistance confer an economic benefit during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy? J Urol. 2014;192:671–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roos FC, Thomas C, Neisius A, Nestler S, Thüroff JW, Hampel C. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: functional and oncological outcomes. Urologe A. 2015;54:213–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Petros FG, Angell JE, Abaza R. Outcomes of robotic nephrectomy including highest-complexity cases: largest series to date and literature review. Urology. 2015;85:1352–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas BC, Slack M, Hussain M, Barber N, Pradhan A, Dinneen E, Stewart GD. Preclinical evaluation of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access renal and prostate surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7:444–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laviana AA, Hu JC. Current controversies and challenges in robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomies. World J Urol. 2014;32:591–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gill IS, Kamoi K, Aron M, Desai MM. 800 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon series. J Urol. 2010;183:34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leow JJ, Heah NH, Chang SL, Chong YL, Png KS. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: an updated meta-analysis of 4,919 patients. J Urol. 2016;196:1371–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jeong IG, Khandwala YS, Kim JH, Han DH, Li S, Wang Y, Chang SL, Chung BI. Association of robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with perioperative outcomes and health care costs, 2003 to 2015. JAMA. 2017;318:1561–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Asimakopoulos AD, Miano R, Annino F, Micali S, Spera E, Iorio B, Vespasiani G, Gaston R. Robotic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review. BMC Urol. 2014;14:75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Masson-Lecomte A, Yates DR, Hupertan V, Haertig A, Chartier-Kastler E, Bitker MO, Vaessen C, Rouprêt M. A prospective comparison of the pathologic and surgical outcomes obtained after elective treatment of renal cell carcinoma by open or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol. 2013;31:924–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Oger E, Vaessen C, Grassano Y, Benoit T, Carrouget J, Pradère B, Khene Z, Giwerc A, et al. Comparison of 1800 robotic and open partial nephrectomies for renal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:4277–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chang KD, Abdel Raheem A, Kim KH, Oh CK, Park SY, Kim YS, Ham WS, Han WK, Choi YD, Chung BH, et al. Functional and oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre comparative matched-pair analyses with a median of 5 years’ follow-up. BJU Int. 2018;122:618–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;67:891–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xia L, Pulido JE, Chelluri RR, Strother MC, Taylor BL, Raman JD, Guzzo TJ. Hospital volume and outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2018;121:900–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Peyronnet B, Tondut L, Bernhard JC, Vaessen C, Doumerc N, Sebe P, Pradere B, Guillonneau B, Khene ZE, Nouhaud FX, et al. Impact of hospital volume and surgeon volume on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes: a multicentre study. BJU Int. 2018;121:916–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Diana P, Buffi NM, Lughezzani G, Dell’Oglio P, Mazzone E, Porter J, Mottrie A. The role of intraoperative indocyanine green in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: results from a large. Multi-inst Ser Eur Urol. 2020;78:743–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gill IS, Metcalfe C, Abreu A, Duddalwar V, Chopra S, Cunningham M, Thangathurai D, Ukimura O, Satkunasivam R, Hung A, et al. Robotic level III inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy: initial series. J Urol. 2015;194:929–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Territo A, Mottrie A, Abaza R, Rogers C, Menon M, Bhandari M, Ahlawat R, Breda A. Robotic kidney transplantation: current status and future perspectives. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017;69:5–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia

    Christopher Soliman, Marc A. Furrer & Nathan Lawrentschuk

Authors
  1. Christopher Soliman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marc A. Furrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nathan Lawrentschuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Soliman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Princess Alexandra Hospital, Harlow, UK

    Sanchia S. Goonewardene

  2. North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK

    Raj Persad

  3. Syracuse, NY, USA

    David Albala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Soliman, C., Furrer, M.A., Lawrentschuk, N. (2022). New Robots and How this has Changed Operative Technique in Renal Cancer Surgery. In: Goonewardene, S.S., Persad, R., Albala, D. (eds) Robotic Surgery for Renal Cancer. Management of Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11000-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11000-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10999-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11000-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation