Abstract
This chapter explores how a particular political procedure, the random recruitment of citizens for public office, relates to, and operates within, two important arenas of political and social activity: civil society and the state. It is based on three case studies. (1) The seditious libel controversy in eighteenth-century Britain. (2) The custodians of the lottery bags in fourteenth-century Florence. (3) Key aspects of ancient Athenian democracy. To begin with, I introduce the subject of the random process in its social setting by looking at lottery use in the distribution of commonly held resources. Because civil society and the state are both contested concepts, this is then followed by a discussion in which I formulate an analytical framework for the case studies. This includes two more categories: political society and the citizens. My overall conclusion is that random recruitment has been used, and can be used, to establish direct working links between the citizenry and the state. These can operate in a manner that is free from the direct influence of civil society and political society groupings.
The Political Potential of Sortition: A study of the random selection of citizens for public office, Exeter, 2008.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is also worth noting in passing how Engels (1942) seems to have been completely unaware of the use of lotteries for the selection of the Athenian boule.
References
Aristotle. (1986). The Athenian constitution. ( P. J. Rhodes, Trans.) Penguin Classics.
Bagg, S. (2021, October 11). Fighting power with power: The administrative state as a weapon against concentrated private power. Social Philosophy and Policy, 38(1), 220–243. Retrieved November 30, 2021, from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy/article/abs/fighting-power-with-power-the-administrative-state-as-a-weapon-against-concentrated-private-power/826A7B803D67E5B171A905D99C269CC5
Briggs, A. (1997). England in the age of improvement (pp. 1783–1867). Folio Society.
Brucker, G. A. (1962). Florentine politics and society (pp. 1343–1378). Princeton University Press.
Cobbett, W. (1811). Parliamentary history of England (Vol. 8) (pp. 1722–1733). T. C. Hansard.
Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. MIT Press.
Devlin, P. (1956). Trial by jury. Stevens and Sons Ltd.
Douglas, D. C. (Ed.). (1959). English historical documents (pp. 1783–1832). Eyre and Spottiswood.
Dowlen, O. (2008). The political potential of sortition. Imprint Academic.
Ehrenberg, V. (1968). From Solon to Socrates. Methuen.
Engels, F. (1942). The origins of the family, private property and the state. International Publishers.
Engels, F. (1955). Anti-Dühring. Lawrence and Wishart Ltd.
Ferguson, A. (1995). An essay on the history of civil society. Cambridge University Press.
Finer, S. E. (1999). The history of government from the earliest times (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press.
Green, R. H. (1910). Lot meadow customs at Yarnton, Oxon. Economic Journal, 20(77), 38–45.
Green, T. A. (1985). Verdict according to conscience. University of Chicago Press.
Hansen M. H. (1999). Athenian democracy in the age of Demosthenes. Bristol Classical.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the philosophy of right. (H. B. Nisbet, Trans.) Cambridge University Press.
Herodotus. (1998). The histories. (R. Waterfield, Trans.) Oxford World’s Classics.
Hignett, C. (1952). A history of the Athenian constitution to the end of the fifth century BC. Clarendon.
Headlam J. W. (1933). Election by lot at Athens (1st ed. 1891). Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1914). Leviathan. Dutton.
Lenin, V. I. (1968). Selected works. Progress Publishers.
Linz, J. J. & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. John Hopkins University Press.
Locke, J. (1993). Political writings. Penguin.
Marx, K. (1942) Selected works in two volumes. (V. Andoratky, Ed.). Martin Lawrence Ltd.
Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1938). The German ideology, Parts 1 & 2. Lawrence and Wishart.
Murray, O. (1988). Greek forms of movernment. In M. Grant & R. Kitzinger (Eds.), Civilisations of the ancient mediterranean. Scriber.
Najemy, J. M. (1982). Corporatism and consensus in Florentine electoral politics (pp. 1280–1400). University of North Carolina Press.
Ober, J. (1998). The Athenian revolution of 508/7 BC. In C. Dougherty & L. Kuuke (Eds.), Cultural poetics of archaic Greece. Oxford University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press.
Ostwald, M. (1988). The reform of the Athenian state by Kleisthenes. Cambridge ancient history (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
Rhodes, P. J. (1972). The Athenian boule. Oxford University Press.
Rousseau, J. J. (1998). The social contract. Wordsworth Editions.
Traill, J. S. (1975). The political organisation of Attica. Hisperia Supplement XIV.
Weber, M. (2009). From Max Weber, essays in sociology. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.). Routledge.
Whitehead, D. (1986). The demes of Attica. Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dowlen, O. (2022). Random Recruitment, Civil Society, and the State. In: Gómez Gutiérrez, J.J., Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Anchústegui Igartua, E. (eds) Democratic Institutions and Practices. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10808-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10808-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10807-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10808-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)