Abstract
This chapter examines the semiotics of abductive inference as based in archetypal images and unconscious processes. The apparent paradox of learning by way of creative thought is unfolded and partially resolved by demonstrating the essentially experimental nature of all knowledge acquisition. Emphasizing the triadic character of Peirce’s conception of the sign and the relevance of Polanyi’s concept of tacit knowledge for theorizing abductive processes of reasoning, the specific role of the imagination in abduction as characterized by a logic of the “included third” rather than that of the excluded middle is analyzed in terms of the figure of the Fool, the zero arcanum, from among the traditional iconography of the Tarot. Formal aspects of abductive reasoning are then considered from the standpoint of the semiotics of visual images and models, in particular their iconic and indexical dimensions and their liminal character as standing between the purely imaginary on the one hand and the rationally cognitive on the other hand.
Inna Semetsky: deceased.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aphek, E., & Tobin, Y. (1989). The semiotics of fortune-telling (Vol. 22, foundations of semiotics). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Barrow, J. D. (2000). The book of nothing. Vintage Books.
Bateson, G., & Bateson, M.C. (1987). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chandler Publishing.
Berne, E. (1977). Intuition and ego states: The origins of transactional analysis. Harper & Row.
Bruner, J. S. (1979). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Harvard University Press.
Colapietro, V. M. (2000). Further consequences of a singular capacity. In J. Muller & J. Brent (Eds.), Peirce, semiotics, and psychoanalysis (pp. 136–158). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Corbin, H. (1972). Mundus imaginalis, or the imaginary and the imaginal (R. Horine, Trans.). Analytical Psychology Club of New York, Inc.
Deely, J. (1990). Basics of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
Deely, J. (2001). Four ages of understanding: The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. University of Toronto Press.
Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. Prometheus Books.
Dummett, M. (1980). The game of tarot: From Ferrara to Salt Lake City. Gerald Duckworth & Co.
Dummett, M., & Decker, R. (2002). A history of the occult tarot, 1870–1970. Gerald Duckworth & Co.
Egorov, B. F. (1977). The simplest semiotic system and the typology of plots. In D. P. Lucid (Ed.), Soviet semiotics: An anthology (pp. 77–86). Johns Hopkins University.
Fetzer, J. H. (1991). Philosophy and cognitive science. Paragon House.
Gill, J. H. (2000). The tacit mode: Michael Polanyi's postmodern philosophy. SUNY Press.
Grush, R., & Churchland, P. S. (1995). Gaps in Penrose's toiling. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(1), 10–29.
Guiraud, P. (1975). Semiology (G. Gross, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge University Press.
Heeren, J. W., & Mason, M. (1984). Seeing and believing: A study of contemporary spiritual readers. Semiotica, 50(3/4), 191–211.
Hintikka, J. (1998). What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Transactions of Charles S. Peirce Society, 34, 503–533.
Hoffmeyer, J., & Emmeche, C. (1991). Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In M. Anderson & F. Merrell (Eds.), On semiotic modeling (pp. 117–166). Mouton De Gruyter.
Jantsch, E. (1975). Design for evolution: Self-organization and planning in the life of human systems. George Braziller.
Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organizing universe: Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution. Pergamon Press.
Jha, S. R. (2002). Reconsidering Michael Polanyi’s philosophy. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Kauffman, L. H. (1996). Virtual logic. Systems Research, 13(3), 293–310.
Kauffman, L. H. (2001). The mathematics of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 8(1–2), 79–110.
Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. The MIT Press.
Kelso, J. A. S., & Engstrøm, D. A. (2006). The complementary nature. The MIT Press.
Kennedy, J. B. (2003). Space, time and Einstein: An introduction. Acumen.
Kevelson, R. (1999). Peirce and the mark of the gryphon. St. Martin's Press.
Kihlstrom, J. F. (1993). The rediscovery of the unconscious. In H. J. Morowitz & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The mind, the brain, and complex adaptive systems (Vol. 22, pp. 123–143). Addison-Wesley.
Lekomceva, M. I., & Uspensky, B. A. (1977). Describing a semiotic system with a simple syntax. In D. P. Lucid (Ed.), Soviet semiotics: An anthology (pp. 65–76). Johns Hopkins University.
Lloyd, S. (2006). Programming the universe: A quantum computer scientist takes on the cosmos. Alfred A. Knopf.
Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Merrell, F. (1992). Sign, textuality, world. Indiana University Press.
Merrell, F. (1995). Peirce’s semiotics now: A primer. Canadian Scholars' Press.
Merrell, F. (1996). Signs grow: Semiosis and life processes. University of Toronto Press.
Merrell, F. (1997). Peirce, signs, and meaning. University of Toronto Press.
Merrell, F. (2002). Learning living, living learning: Signs, between east and west. Legas.
Nöth, W. (1995). Handbook of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
Nöth, W. (2012). Translation and semiotic mediation. Sign Systems Studies, 40(3–4), 279–298.
Nöth, W., & Jungk, I. (2015). Peircean visual semiotics: Potentials to be explored. Semiotica, 2015(207), 657–673.
Otte, M. F. (2011). Evolution, learning, and semiotics from a Peircean point of view. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 313–329.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1935; 1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 1–6, Ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss; Vol. 7 and 8, Ed. A. Burks). Harvard University Press. [cited as CP].
Peirce, C.S., & Jastrow, J. (1884). On small differences of sensation. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, 3, 75–83
Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of consciousness. Oxford University Press.
Penrose, R. (1997). The large, the small, and the human mind. Cambridge University Press.
Penrose, R. (2004). The road to reality: A complete guide to the laws of the universe. Jonathan Cape.
Polanyi, M. (1964). Science, faith, and society. University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday.
Posner, R. (2004). Basic tasks of cultural semiotics. In G. Withalm & J. Wallmannsberger (Eds.), Signs of power – Power of signs. Essays in honor of Jeff Bernard (pp. 56–89). INST.
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos. Bantam Books.
Rockwell, W. T. (2007). Neither brain nor ghost: A nondualist alternative to the mind-brain identity theory. The MIT Press.
Rotman, B. (1987). Signifying nothing: The semiotics of zero. Stanford University Press.
Rotman, B. (1993). Ad infinitum – The ghost in turing's machine. Stanford University Press.
Rucker, R. (1982). Infinity and the mind: The science and philosophy of the infinite. Birkhauser.
Schattschneider, D. (2010). The mathematical side of M.C. Escher. Notices of the AMS, 57(6), 706–718.
Sebeok, T. A. (Ed.). (1994). Encyclopedic dictionary of semiotics (Approaches to semiotics; 73) (Vol. 1). Mouton de Gruyter.
Semetsky, I. (2004). The role of intuition in thinking and learning: Deleuze and the pragmatic legacy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(4), 433–454.
Semetsky, I. (2011). Re-symbolization of the self: Human development and tarot hermeneutic. Sense Publishers.
Semetsky, I. (2013). The edusemiotics of images: Essays on the art∼science of tarot. Sense Publishers.
Semetsky, I. (2014). Taking the edusemiotic turn: A body∼mind approach to education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(3), 490–506.
Semetsky, I. (2015). Interpreting Peirce’s abduction through the lens of mathematics. In M. Bockarova, M. Danesi, D. Martinovic, & R. Núñez (Eds.), Mind in mathematics: Essays on mathematical cognition and mathematical method (pp. 154–166). Lincom.
Semetsky, I. (2020). Semiotic subjectivity in education and counseling: Learning with the unconscious. Routledge.
Semetsky, I., & Stables, A. (Eds.). (2014). Pedagogy and edusemiotics: Theoretical challenges/practical opportunities. Sense Publishers.
Shimony, A. (1989). Search for a worldview which can accommodate our knowledge of microphysics. In J. T. Cushing & E. McMullin (Eds.), Philosophical consequences of quantum theory: Reflections on Bell’s theorem. University of Notre Dame Press.
Shimony, A. (1993). Search for a naturalistic world view: Scientific method and epistemology (Vol. I-II). Cambridge University Press.
Shlain, L. (1998). The alphabet versus the goddess: The conflict between word and image. Viking.
Simon, H. A. (1995). Near decomposability and complexity: How a mind resides in a brain. In H. J. Morovitz & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The mind, the brain, and complex adaptive systems. Proceedings vol. XXII. Santa Fe institute in the sciences of complexity (pp. 25–43). Addison-Wesley.
Snyder, I. (Ed.). (1997). Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era. Allen & Unwin.
Spencer-Brown, G. (1979). Laws of form. E. P. Dutton.
Stapp, H. P. (2007). Mindful universe: Quantum mechanics and the participating observer. Springer-Verlag.
Stjernfelt, F. (2007). Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Springer.
Thom, R. (1985). From the icon to the symbol. In R. E. Innis (Ed.), Semiotics: An introductory anthology (pp. 275–291). Indiana University Press.
Tversky, B. (2019). Mind in motion: How action shapes thought. Basic Books.
Varela, F. J. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. North Holland.
Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom and cognition. Stanford University Press.
Von Eckardt, B. (1996). What is cognitive science? The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Semetsky, I. (2023). Visual Semiotics, Abduction, and the Learning Paradox: The Role of Graphic Signs. In: Magnani, L. (eds) Handbook of Abductive Cognition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10134-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10135-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering