Skip to main content

CODA: Transmedia Cultural History, Convergence Culture, and the Future of Adaptation Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adaptation Before Cinema

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture ((PSADVC))

  • 250 Accesses

Abstract

Adaptation studies, whether situated in literary or media studies, lacks a coherent model that illustrates how many adaptations of the same story work together, creating what Paul Davis, Brian Rose, and others refer to as “culture-texts.” Culture-texts are retold and remade countlessly, over long periods of time, building a large network of adaptations and remakes that is neither owned nor dominated by a particular author, medium, or “authoritative” version. Similarly, contemporary media studies does not fully account for how much today’s industry practices are inheritances of the past—adapted and repackaged not only for modern audiences but also for new technological, economic, legal, political, and social contexts. This chapter adapts and expands Henry Jenkins’s theories of transmedia storytelling, convergence culture, and participatory culture to develop a new model for transhistorical adaptation studies. This transhistorical view includes storytelling across a diverse range of forms and media, including literature, the performing arts, visual arts, film and television, new media, and immersive/hybrid forms. Szwydky’s “Transmedia cultural history” expands existing definitions to include long-term historical awareness and engagement. Transmedia cultural history incorporates practices of artistic production, industrial convergence, and ongoing audience (and scholarly) reception. This term explores how technology, spectacle, celebrity, the proliferation and commercialization of art forms, world-building, tie-ins, and merchandizing functioned at different historical moments. Moreover, it provides opportunities to identify and examine how cultural production in early periods has influenced complementary practices in later periods, including the present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Works Cited

  • Adorno, Theodor W. The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture, edited by J. M. Bernstein, Routledge, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley Andrew, “Adaptation,” in Concepts in Film Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984. 96–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortolotti, Gary, and Linda Hutcheon, “On the Origins of Adaptation: Rethinking ‘Success’—Biologically.” New Literary History (2007): 443–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brylowe, Thora. Romantic Art in Practice: Cultural Work and the Sister Arts, 1760–1820. Cambridge University Press, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Kamilla. Theorizing Adaptation. Oxford University Press, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, Jay A. “Oscars 2014: How Adaptations Continue to Shape the Conversation.” Signature-Reads, 24 February 2014, http://www.signature-reads.com/2014/02/oscars-2014-how-adaptations-continue-to-shape-the-conversation/

  • Forry, Steven. Hideous Progenies: Dramatizations of Frankenstein from Mary Shelley to the Present. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, Whitney. “125+ Books Becoming TV Series We Cannot Wait to See.” Rotten Tomatoes. September 3, 2021. https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/books-becoming-tv-and-streaming-series/

  • Genette, Gérard. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Translated by Channa Newman and Claude Doubinsky. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1997. Originally published in French by Editions du Seuil, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Julie. Literature, Film, and their Hideous Progeny: Adaptation and ElasTEXTity. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Adaptation. Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jellenik, Glenn. “The Task of the Adaptation Critic” in, eds. Adaptation in Visual Culture: Images, Texts, and Their Multiple Worlds, edited by Julie Grossman and J. Barton Palmer, Palgrave, 2017, pp. 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry. “Transmedia 202: Further Reflections.” Henryjenkins.org. 31 July 2011. http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2011/08/defining_transmedia_further_re.html

  • Laird, Karen E. The Art of Adapting Victorian Literature, 1848–1920: Jane Eyre, David Copperfield, and The Woman in White. Ashgate, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, Douglas M. “Shakespearean Rhizomatics: Adaptation, Ethics, Value.” Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation, edited by Alexa Huang and Elizabeth Rivlin, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, pp. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, Thomas. “Twelve Fallacies in Contemporary Adaptation Theory.” Criticism 45.2 (Spring 2003), 149–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCabe, Colin, Kathleen Murray, and Rick Warner, eds. True to the Spirit: Film Adaptation and the Question of Fidelity. Oxford University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manshel, Alexander, Laura B. McGrath, and J. D. Porter. Illustrations by Vanessa Saba. “The Rise of Must-Read TV: How Your Netflix Habit is Changing Content.” The Atlantic, 16 July 2021, https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2021/07/tv-adaptations-fiction/619442/

  • Meer, Sarah. Uncle Tom Mania: Slavery, Minstrelsy, and Transatlantic Culture in the 1850s. University of Georgia Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, Kyle. Adaptations in the Franchise Era, 2001–2016. Bloomsbury, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, Martin. Realizations: Narrative, Pictorial, and Theatrical Arts in Nineteenth-Century England. Princeton University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittell, Jason. “Operational Seriality and the Operation of Seriality.” The Edinburgh Companion to Contemporary Narrative Theories, eds. Zara Dinnen and Robyn Warhol. Edinburg University Press, 2018, 227–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Simone. The Adaptation Industry: The Cultural Economy of Contemporary Literary Adaptation. Routledge, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nealon, Jeffrey T., and Caren Irr, eds. Rethinking the Frankfurt School: Alternative Legacies of Cultural Critique. State University of New York Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, Anne. The Afterlives of Walter Scott: Memory on the Move. Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Julie. Adaptation and Appropriation. Routledge, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenza, Gregory. “Towards a Historical Turn? Adaptation Studies and the Challenges of History.” The Routledge Companion to Adaptation, edited by Dennis Cutchins, Katja Krebs, and Eckart Voigts, Routledge, 2018, 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szwydky, Lissette Lopez. “Adaptations, Culture-Texts, and Literary Canonization.” The Routledge Companion to Adaptation, edited by Dennis Cutchins, Katja Krebs, and Eckart Voigts, Routledge, 2018, 128–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Transmedia Adaptation in the Nineteenth Century. Ohio State University Press, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Kaitlin. “Everything’s an Adaptation: You Won’t Believe How Many Current TV Shows Began as Something Else,” Tv.com, 28 August 2014, http://www.tv.com/news/tv-show-adaptations-140909871911/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lissette Lopez Szwydky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Szwydky, L.L. (2023). CODA: Transmedia Cultural History, Convergence Culture, and the Future of Adaptation Studies. In: Szwydky, L.L., Jellenik, G. (eds) Adaptation Before Cinema. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09596-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics