Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Basic Income in Korea and Beyond

Part of the book series: Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee ((BIG))

  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

Tracing the ideological origin and context of basic income, it becomes evident that the idea of basic income is a product of history accumulated over hundreds of years. Since the twentieth century, not only the discipline of economics but also the socio-politically conservative and progressive parties have discussed the pros and cons on the idea of basic income and worked on ideological developments and experimental attempts. This study was designed not only to urge interest in the religious and theological circles in the basic income discourse, but also to share the converging and complex research results of theology and social science to Korean society, and to contribute to future cooperation through global networks. To this end, this study was conducted by specialists in various fields of theology and social science by mobilizing their own perspectives and methods, and through surveys they identified awareness and expectations of basic income, and finally, suggested tasks for changing consciousness and enlightenment of the respondents.

This part has been translated by Jeong Jin-Lee. He is a PhD candidate of Department of Political Science & International Studies in Yonsei University, serving as R.A for Professor Mee-Hyun Chung and Park Myung-Lim. His academic interests lie in republicanism, inequality, planetary politics, and interdisciplinary studies in politics and theology. He received a bachelor’s degree in English literature and East Asia Study at Yonsei University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The results of the joint study were presented through open academic seminars at home and abroad held online on December 11, 2020, and October 15, 2021, and the contents were refined to reflect the comments at the seminars.

  2. 2.

    Lee Young-Jae, “Basic Income Levy in Pentateuch,” Christian Thought, 690(2016), 66–77; Lee Young-Jae, who was originally supposed to be in charge of the Old Testament field when this joint research team was planned, died on June 10, 2021, so he was unable to participate in the joint research. In a doctoral thesis submitted to Aberdeen University, the deceased not only conducted in-depth research on the economic aspects of Pentateuch, but also actively worked as a founding member of the Jeonbuk Basic Income Network by incorporating the research contents into practice. In addition, he specifically experimented with basic income at Jeonju Hwapyeong Church, and presented the case at a domestic academic seminar in December 2020. From the bottom of my heart, I would like to thank the deceased for his academic dedication.

  3. 3.

    Kim Sang-Ki, “Basic Income: To Brighten the Dark Future,” Christian Thought, 699(2017), 122–133.

  4. 4.

    Lee Sa-Ya, “The Land and Social Ethics in the Old Testament: Focusing on Sabbath Year and Jubilee,” Christian Social Ethics, 32(2015), 277–305.

  5. 5.

    Lee Sa-Ya, “The Land and Social Ethics in the Old Testament: Focusing on Sabbath Year and Jubilee,” Christian Social Ethics, 18(2009), 259–288.

  6. 6.

    Hae-Kwon Kim, “The Idea of the Jubilee in the Old Testament and Its Socio-ethical Implications,” Sinhaksasang, 127(2004), 131–166; Hae-Kwon Kim filled the void in the Old Testament study following Dr. Lee Young-Jae’s death. Since he already had profound knowledge in the subject, he was able to join us in a relatively short time. I deeply appreciate his resolute decision and help.

  7. 7.

    Shin Hyeon-Woo emphasizes that the word “great possession” in Greek Language mentioned in Mark 10:22 refers to land, not property, so Jesus also commanded to abide by the Jubilee Land Act. Shin Hyeon-Woo, “Is There No Law of Jubilee in the New Testament?” in “Jubilee, Korea Society, Kingdom of God” (Hongsungsa: Seoul, 2012): 141–175.

  8. 8.

    Cho Tae-Yeon analyzes the characteristics of the Galilee economy and says “The middle class collapsed, and the social hierarchy became polarized… It brought about the polarization of the social hierarchy and the concentration of wealth.” Cho Tae-Yeon, “Economic of Galilee” edited by Korean New Testament Studies in “Economic ethics in New Testament” (Seoul: Handl, 1998), 62–88, especially 88. In addition, Kim Myung-Soo cites the privatization of the public as a commonality between the Roman Empire and financial capitalism. On the other hand, he defines the kingdom of God as “the order of sharing of the private.” Kim Myung-Soo, “An Economic Ethics of Jesus as the Public in the Synoptic Gospels,” Sinhaksasang, 150 (2010), 83–115, especially 109.

  9. 9.

    Kim Deuk-Joong, “Economic Ethics in New Testament” edited by Korean New Testament Studies in Economic Ethics in New Testament (Seoul: Handl, 1998), 25–26; Kim Kyoung-Jin says that the characteristics of the Gospel of Luke are “pastoral consideration for the rich” and “interest of love in the poor.” Luke criticizes waste of wealth (The Parable of the Prodigal Son, The Parable of the Dishonest Steward, The Parable of The Rich Man and Lazarus), obsession (The Parable of Young Rich Ruler, The Parable of a young and rich ruler, The Parable of Sower), and teaches giving to the needy (Matthew 6.19–21;23.26/Luke 3.11; 10.30–37; 11.41; 12.33; 14.12–15, 15–24; 18.22; 19.8) as a good way of using wealth. Kim Kyoung-Jin, “Perspective on Wealth, Creed of Steward, and Giving to the Needy in Luke Theology,” edited by Korean New Testament Studies in “Economic Ethics in New Testament” (Seoul: Handl, 1998), 97–111.

  10. 10.

    Lee Yang-Ho, “Luther’s Life and Thoughts” (Seoul: The Christian Literature Society of Korea, 2002), 224ff.

  11. 11.

    Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, tr. Talcott Parsons (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1978), 81.

  12. 12.

    Ernst Troeltsch says Luther demanded that Christians live in the world fundamentally according to Christian standards in ethics, but, like Catholic theologians, failed to overcome the dualism of ethics, thus making a compromise between world ethics and grace inevitable. Ernst Troeltsch, “The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches,” trans. Olive Wyon, 2 vols. (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1931), 506–511.

  13. 13.

    Max Stackhouse, “Creeds, Society, and Human Rights: A Study in Three Cultures” (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1984), 54–55.

  14. 14.

    Carter Lindberg, “Beyond Charity: Reformation Initiatives for the Poor” (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993), 162.

  15. 15.

    Won-Don Kang, “Evaluating the Concept of Basic Income from the Perspective of Christian Ethics,” Sinhaksasang, 150(2010), 177–215.

  16. 16.

    Ho-Chul Kwak, “A Christian Alternative to Neoliberalism: Reconfigured Basic Income Guarantee,” 150(2010), 177–215.

  17. 17.

    Kim Seong-Ho, “A Study of Christian Social Ethical Practice on the Basic Income Controversy: Focused on Christian Social Welfare Practice,” Christian Social Ethics, 38(2017), 113–142.

  18. 18.

    Oh Dann-Y and Seo Bong-Kyun, “An Application of Basic Income for Christian Welfare Practice in Terms of the Perspective of Reformation,” Christian Social Ethics, 40(2018), 121–145; Kim Dong-Hwan, “A Christian Ethical Reflection upon Basic Income in the Age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” Christian Social Ethics, 44(2019), 49–82.

  19. 19.

    Mee-Hyun Chung, “An Inquiry into Labor from a Feminist Theological Perspective: Regarding the Issue of Basic Income,” Christian Social Ethics, 42(2018), 241–264: Mee-Hyun Chung, “An Eco Feminist Theological Approach to Discourse about Basic Income,” Studies on Life and Culture, 61(2021/8), 1–26.

  20. 20.

    Fields of study that Yannick Vanderborght is interested in are comparative politics, comparative social policy, comparative social history, unemployment and poverty, labor unions, and basic income. He has written seven books on basic income with his academic advisor Parijs and other scholars and has published around 50 research papers since 2000. This Belgian scholar, along with Parijs, is the most cited scholar worldwide when discussing basic income.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mee-Hyun Chung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chung, MH. (2023). Introduction. In: Chung, MH. (eds) Basic Income in Korea and Beyond. Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09202-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09202-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09201-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09202-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics