Skip to main content

United States–Canada: The Two Overlapping Democratic Trajectories in North America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy under Pressure

Part of the book series: Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century ((CDC))

  • 265 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter compares the democratisation trajectories of two of the oldest and most venerable of the world’s ‘really existing’ democracies—Canada and the United States. It adopts a long run ‘Comparative Political Development’ perspective which places twenty-first-century variations within a broad and configurative context. These two large federal regimes of recent settlement have many crucial structural and cultural features in common, and both belong clearly within the established democracy subset of countries. Yet they also display some very significant contrasts—presidential versus parliamentary; inflected by the legacy of slavery versus anglophone ascendancy over francophones; and much more. The chapter provides a critical re-reading and updating of Lipset, Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada, Routledge, 1990 study of these matters and traces the diverging trends of democratic slippage in the USA versus deepening in Canada. Notwithstanding these divergences, it resists the tendency to over-dramatise recent events, or to extrapolate them too far. Both cases belong within the overall TRU framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. (2018). One person, no vote: How voter suppression is destroying our democracy. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, D. A. (2018). Disenfranchising democracy: Constructing the electorate in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Teorell, J., et al. (2020). Varieties of democracy: Measuring two centuries of political change. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (2002). How democratic is the American constitution? (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Tocqueville, A. (1945). Democracy in America (Vol. II). Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. J. (2021). Demons of the present. The New Statesman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foner, E. (1998). The story of American freedom. W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frymer, P. (2014). A rush, and a push, and the land is ours: Territorial expansion, land policy, and U.S. state formation. Perspectives on Politics, 12(1), 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, A. (2012). Commons and enclosure in the colonisation of North America. American Historical Review, 117(2), 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, L. (1955). The liberal tradition in America. Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, R. (1965). The paranoid style in American politics. Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (2004). Who are we? The challenge to America’s national identity. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. F. (2018). Cultural evolution: People’s motivations are changing, and reshaping the world. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. F. (2020). Giving up on God: The global decline of religion. Foreign affairs. www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2020-08-11/religion-giving-god (Last accessed 18 January 2021).

  • King, D. (1995). Separate and unequal: Black Americans and the U.S. federal government. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. (2000). Making Americans: Immigration, race, and the origins of the diverse democracy. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. (2011). Still a house divided: Race and politics in Obama’s America. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King, D., Lieberman, R. C., Ritter, G., & Whitehead, L. (2009). Democratisation in America: A comparative-historical analysis. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix, J.-M. (2016). Histoire du Canada: Des Origines a Nos Jours. Tallandier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levistky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1971). Agrarian socialism (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1979). The first new nation: The United States in historical and comparative perspective. W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1990). Continental divide: The values and institutions of the United States and Canada. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., & Marks, G. (2000). It didn’t happen here. W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRoberts, K., & Monahan, P. (1993). The Charlottetown accord, the referendum, and the future of Canada. University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., Cameron, S., & Wynter, T. (2019). Electoral integrity in America: Securing democracy. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, B. I., & Gilens, M. (2017). Democracy in America: What has gone wrong and what we can do about it. Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P., & Schickler, E. (2020, May). Madison’s constitution under stress: A developmental analysis of political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, A., & Rossinow, D. (2017). Outside in: The transnational circuitry of American history. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (2019). Crises of democracy. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, D. (2018). How democracy ends. Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunt, C. (2020). Unworthy republic: The dispossession of native Americans. WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, P. (2017). Counting Americans: How the U.S. census classified the nation. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, B. (1991). Is America different? A new look at American exceptionalism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (2018). Can it happen here? Authoritarianism in America. Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. M. (2000). Canada and the United States: Differences that count. Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, A. K. (1935). Manifest destiny: A study of nationalist expansion in American history. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, L. (2022). Political polarization: A conceptual survey. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 18(1).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence Whitehead .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Whitehead, L. (2022). United States–Canada: The Two Overlapping Democratic Trajectories in North America. In: van Beek, U. (eds) Democracy under Pressure. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09123-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics