Abstract
This chapter discusses the contributions in the edited volume Methods for Researching Professional Learning and Development: Challenges, Applications and Empirical Illustrations from a primarily qualitative research perspective. The discussion takes the different methodological challenges or shortcomings that the chapters aim at addressing as a starting point, and moves between the suggested methods to discuss opportunities and limitations. A recurrent challenge is to find adequate ways to approach and delimit work practices within which learning unfolds, especially when work becomes multi-sited, interlinked in network constellations of actors and practices, and possibly black-boxed through the use of various information systems. In these efforts, a variety of theoretical and methodological approaches is needed. This edited volume is a valuable contribution to methodological discussion and awareness, which, through its various chapters, provides condensed introductions to various approaches as well as examples of how the given approach has been used in studies of professional learning or development. A suggested way forward is to establish more strategic connections to other research fields that take an interest in work-related learning and development, such as organisation studies, information system research and infrastructure studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anthony, C. (2021). When knowledge work and analytical technologies collide: The practices and consequences of black boxing algorithmic technologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(4), 1173–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211016755
Bailey, D., Faraj, S., Hinds, P., Leonardi, P. M., & von Krogh, G. (2022). We are all theorists of technology now: A relational perspective on emerging technology and organizing. Organization Science, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1562
Cuyvers, K., Van den Bossche, P., & Donche, V. (2022). Longitudinal case study research to study self-regulation of professional learning: Combining observations and stimulated recall interviews throughout everyday work. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 579–600). Springer.
Damşa, C. I., & Nerland, M. (2016). Student learning through participation in inquiry activities: Two case studies in teacher and computer engineering education. Vocations and Learning, 9, 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9152-9
David, L., Endedijk, M., & Van den Bossche, P. (2022). Investigating interaction dynamics: A temporal approach to team learning. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 187–209). Springer.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 1–26). Sage.
Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise. Springer.
Filliettaz, L., Garcia, S., & Zogmal, M. (2022). Video-based interaction analysis: A research and training method to understand workplace learning and professional development. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 419–440). Springer.
Gerholz, K.-H., & Wagner, A. (2022). Design-based research – Grounding, understanding and empirical illustration in the context of vocational education. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 513–534). Springer.
Harteis, C. (2022). Research on workplace learning in times of digitalisation. In C. Harteis, D. Gijbels, & E. Kyndt (Eds.), Research approaches on workplace learning (Vol. 31). Professional and Practice-based Learning, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89582-2_19
Harteis, C. (2022). Delphi-technique as a method for research on professional learning. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 351–371). Springer.
Herzum, M., & Simonsen, J. (2019). Configuring information systems and work practices for each other: What competences are needed locally? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 122, 242–255.
Kajamaa, A., & Hyrkkö, S. (2022). Change laboratory method for facilitating transformative agency and collective professional learning – Case from a Finnish elementary school. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 535–556). Springer.
Kyndt, E., & Aerts, J. (2022). Addressing ‘wicked problems’ using visual analysis. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 329–348). Springer.
Lemmetty, S., Collin, K., Glăveanu, V., & Paloniemi, S. (2022). Capturing actions of communities: Towards virtual ethnography and digital tools in researching organizations and workplace learning. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 397–418). Springer.
Littlejohn, A., & Pammer-Schindler, V. (2022). Technologies for professional learning. In C. Harteis, D. Gijbels, & E. Kyndt (Eds.), Research approaches on workplace learning. Professional and practice-based learning (Vol. 31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89582-2_15
Littlejohn, A., Kennedy, E., & Laurillard, D. (2022). Professional learning analytics: Understanding complex learning processes through measurement, collection, analysis, and reporting of MOOC data. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 557–578). Springer.
Ludvigsen, S., & Nerland, M. (2018). Learning at work: Social practices and units of analysis. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 147–156). Routledge.
Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Epistemic fluency and professional education. Springer.
Markauskaite, L., Goodyear, P., & Sutherland, L. (2021). Learning for knowledgeable action: The construction of actionable conceptualisations as a unit of analysis in researching professional learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 31, Part B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100382
Maxwell, J. A., & Chmiel, M. (2014). Notes toward a theory of qualitative data analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. Sage.
Nerland, M., & Hasu, M. (2021). Challenging the belief in simple solutions: The need for epistemic practices in professional work. Medical Education, 55(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14294
Nicolini, D., Mørk, B. E., Masovic, J., & Hanseth, O. (2018). The changing nature of expertise: Insights from TAVI. Studies in Continuing Education, 40(3), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1463212
Noordegraaf, M. (2016). Reconfiguring professional work: Changing forms of professionalism in public services. Administration and Society, 48(7), 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713509242
Noordegraaf, M. (2020). Protective or connective professionalism? How connected professionals can (still) act as autonomous and authoritative experts. Journal of Professions and Organization, 7(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa011
Pachidi, S., Berends, H., Faraj, S., & Huysman, M. (2020). Make way for the algorithms: Symbolic actions and change in a regime of knowing. Organization Science, 32(1), 18–41.
Paloniemi, S., Penttonen, M., Eteläpelto, A., Hökkä, P., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2022). Integrating self-reports and electrodermal activity (EDA) measurement in studying emotions in professional learning. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 87–109). Springer.
Rausch, A., Goller, M., & Steffen, B. (2022). Uncovering informal workplace learning by using diaries. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 43–70). Springer.
Silvennoinen, M., Parviainen, T., Malinen, A., Karjalainen, S., Manu, M., & Vesisenaho, M. (2022). Combining physiological and experiential measures to study adult learning. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 137–164). Springer.
Tronsmo, E. (2020). Changing conditions for teachers’ knowledge work: New actor constellations and responsibilities. The Curriculum Journal, 31, 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.60
Vähäsantanen, K., & Arvaja, M. (2022). The narrative approach to research professional identity: Relational, temporal, and dialogical perspectives. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 373–395). Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nerland, M. (2022). Researching Professional Learning in Complex Environments: Opportunities and Challenges from a Qualitative Research Perspective. In: Goller, M., Kyndt, E., Paloniemi, S., DamÅŸa, C. (eds) Methods for Researching Professional Learning and Development. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08517-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08518-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)