Skip to main content

Data Mining and Analytics in the Context of Workplace Learning: Benefits and Affordances

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Methods for Researching Professional Learning and Development

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 33))

Abstract

Technology-based innovations in workplace learning have significantly altered both the scale and resolution of measurements for supporting learning processes in organisations. The increased availability of vast and highly varied amounts of data from settings in the context of workplace learning is overwhelming. This chapter outlines standards in data mining with a specific focus on data from workplace learning. Further, different data mining and analytics methodologies, such as Support Vector Machines or Decision Trees, are presented. An emphasis is shifted to the understanding of learning analytics which are a socio-technical data-mining and analytic practice in educational contexts. The chapter closes with an outlook on how data mining and analytics may provide benefits for future workplace learning scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adekitan, A. I., & Noma-Osaghae, E. (2019). Data mining approach to predicting the performance of first year student in a university using the admission requirements. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 1527–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9839-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 253–272). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J. (1967). Stochastic models for social processes. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, A. M., Branka, J., & Kismihók, G. (2018). Combining learning analytics with job market intelligence to support learning at the workplace. In D. Ifenthaler (Ed.), Digital workplace learning. Bridging formal and informal learning with digital technologies (pp. 129–148). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland, M., Baker, R. S., & Bilkstein, P. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics: Applications to constructionist research. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9223-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2012). Workplace learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 3477–3480). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_478

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blikstein, P., & Worsley, M. (2016). Multimodal learning analytics and education data mining: Using computational technologies to measure complex learning tasks. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.32.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodily, R., & Verbert, K. (2017). Review of research on student-facing learning analytics dashboards and educational recommender systems. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(4), 405–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, A. J., Bang, A., Pan, Y., & Graves, K. E. (2019). Education leadership data analytics (ELDA): A white paper report on the 2018 ELDA summit. Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, A., & Steinwart, I. (2008). Support vector machines. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleophas, T. J., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2013). Support vector machines. In Machine learning in medicine (pp. 155–161). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6886-4_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, F. S., Morgan, M., & Patrinos, A. (2003). The human genome project: Lessons from large-scale biology. Science, 300(5617), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00994018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva, J. L., Caeiro, F., Natário, I., & Braumann, C. A. (2013). Advances in regression, survival analysis, extreme values, markov processes and other statistical applications. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daud, A., Aljohani, N., Abbasi, R., Lytras, M., Abbas, F., & Alowibdi, J. (2017). Predicting student performance using advanced learning analytics. Conference on World Wide Web Companion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and analytics – It’s a DELICATE issue. A checklist for trusted learning analytics. Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, H., Burges, C. J. C., Kaufman, L., Smola, A., & Vapnik, V. (1997). Support vector regression machines. In M. C. Mozer, M. I. Jordan, & T. Petsche (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 9 (pp. 155–161). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egloffstein, M., & Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Employee perspectives on MOOCs for workplace learning. TechTrends, 61(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0127-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GaÅ¡ević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GaÅ¡ević, D., Jovanović, J., Pardo, A., & Dawson, S. (2017). Detecting learning strategies with analytics: Links with self-reported measures and academic performance. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/jla.2017.42.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GaÅ¡ević, D., Joksimović, S., Eagan, B. R., & Shaffer, D. W. (2019). SENS: Network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 562–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Preparing the next generation of education researchers for big data in higher education. In B. Kei Daniel (Ed.), Big data and learning analytics: Current theory and practice in higher education (pp. 29–42). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2020). Adoption of learning analytics. In D. Ifenthaler & D. C. Gibson (Eds.), Adoption of data analytics in higher education learning and teaching (pp. 3–20). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. C., Huband, S., Ifenthaler, D., & Parkin, E. (2018). Return on investment in higher education retention: Systematic focus on actionable information from data analytics ascilite Conference, Geelong, VIC, Australia, 25-11-2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. C., Webb, M., & Ifenthaler, D. (2019). Measurement challenges of interactive educational assessment. In D. G. Sampson, J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, P. Isaias, & S. Sergis (Eds.), Learning technologies for transforming teaching, learning and assessment at large scale (pp. 19–33). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Learning and instruction in the digital age. In J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, P. Isaías, Kinshuk, & D. G. Sampson (Eds.), Learning and instruction in the digital age: Making a difference through cognitive approaches, technology-facilitated collaboration and assessment, and personalized communications (pp. 3–10). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Computer simulation model. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (Vol. 3, pp. 710–713). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Toward automated computer-based visualization and assessment of team-based performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2015). Learning analytics. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology (Vol. 2, pp. 447–451). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2017a). Are higher education institutions prepared for learning analytics? TechTrends, 61(4), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0154-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2017b). Designing effective digital learning environments: Toward learning analytics design. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 401–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9333-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2018). How we learn at the digital workplace. In D. Ifenthaler (Ed.), Digital workplace learning. Bridging formal and informal learning with digital technologies (pp. 3–8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46215-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2020a). Change management for learning analytics. In N. Pinkwart & S. Liu (Eds.), Artificial intelligence supported educational technologies (pp. 261–272). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2020b). Supporting higher education students through analytics systems. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2019-0173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D. (2021). Learning analytics for school and system management. In OECD (Ed.), OECD digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots (pp. 161–172). OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Eseryel, D. (2013). Facilitating complex learning by mobile augmented reality learning environments. In R. Huang, Kinshuk, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Reshaping learning: The frontiers of learning technologies in a global context (pp. 415–438). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Pirnay-Dummer, P. (2011). States and processes of learning communities. Engaging students in meaningful reflection and elaboration. In B. White, I. King, & P. Tsang (Eds.), Social media tools and platforms in learning environments: Present and future (pp. 81–94). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20392-3_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016a). Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 923–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9477-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016b). Udacity. In S. Danver (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of online education (pp. 1149–1151). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2019). Releasing personal information within learning analytics systems. In D. G. Sampson, J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, P. Isaias, & S. Sergis (Eds.), Learning technologies for transforming teaching, learning and assessment at large scale (pp. 3–18). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Widanapathirana, C. (2014). Development and validation of a learning analytics framework: Two case studies using support vector machines. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9226-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1961–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., Eseryel, D., & Ge, X. (2012). Assessment for game-based learning. In D. Ifenthaler, D. Eseryel, & X. Ge (Eds.), Assessment in game-based learning. Foundations, innovations, and perspectives (pp. 3–10). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., Gibson, D. C., & Dobozy, E. (2018a). Informing learning design through analytics: Applying network graph analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D. G., & Spector, J. M. (2018b). Linking analytics data and digital systems for supporting cognition and exploratory learning in 21st century. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 348–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., Yau, J. Y.-K., & Mah, D.-K. (Eds.). (2019). Utilizing learning analytics to support study success. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., Gibson, D. C., Prasse, D., Shimada, A., & Yamada, M. (2021). Putting learning back into learning analytics: Actions for policy makers, researchers, and practitioners. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2131–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09909-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. (2016). Nachhaltige Personalentwicklung und Weiterbildung (2nd ed.). Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kevan, J. M., & Ryan, P. R. (2016). Experience API: Flexible, decentralized and activity-centric data collection. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9260-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacave, C., Molina, A., & Cruz-Lemus, J. (2018). Learning analytics to identify dropout factors of Computer Science studies through Bayesian networks. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(10–11), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1485053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakkaraju, H., Aguiar, E., Shan, C., Miller, D., Bhanpuri, D., Ghani, R., & Addison, K. L. (2015). A machine learning framework to identify students at risk of adverse academic outcomes. KDD '15: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, P., Ebner, M., & Ebner, M. (2019). Learning analytics challenges to overcome in higher education institutions. In D. Ifenthaler, J. Y.-K. Yau, & D.-K. Mah (Eds.), Utilizing learning analytics to support study success (pp. 91–104). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer, L., Heathcote, E., & Dawson, S. (2013). Informing pedagogical action: Aligning learning analytics with learning design. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1439–1459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. M., & Corrin, L. (2017). What data and analytics can and do say about effective learning. npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0006-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, P. D., & Siemens, G. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, L., & Dawson, S. (2012). Numbers are not enough. Why e-Learning analytics failed to inform an institutional strategic plan. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 245–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pistilli, M. D., & Arnold, K. E. (2010). Purdue signals: Mining real-time academic data to enhance student success. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 15(3), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.20025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2014). Student data privacy and institutional accountability in an age of surveillance. In M. E. Menon, D. G. Terkla, & P. Gibbs (Eds.), Using data to improve higher education. Research, policy and practice (pp. 197–214). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G. (2014). The returns to investment in higher education. In M. E. Menon, D. G. Terkla, & P. Gibbs (Eds.), Using data to improve higher education. Global perspectives on higher education (pp. 121–148). Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022643204877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizkiy, M., & Baker, R. S. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of educational data mining. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, M., & Ifenthaler, D. (Eds.). (2021). Visualizations and dashboards for learning analytics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81222-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, D. G., Isaias, P., Ifenthaler, D., & Spector, J. M. (Eds.). (2013). Ubiquitous and mobile learning in the digital age. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3329-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, C., Klasen, D., & Ifenthaler, D. (2019). Implementation of a learning analytics system in a productive higher education environment. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Emerging trends in learning analytics (pp. 177–199). Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclater, N., & Mullan, J. (2017). Learning analytics and student success – Assessing the evidence. JISC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedrakyan, G., Mannens, E., & Verbert, K. (2018). Guiding the choice of learning dashboard visualizations: Linking dashboard design and data visualization concepts. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 50, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2018.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, E., & Kutieleh, S. (2017). Using predictive analytics to target and improve first year student attrition. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 61(2), 200–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seufert, S., Meier, C., Soellner, M., & Rietsche, R. (2019). A pedagogical perspective on big data and learning analytics: A conceptual model for digital learning support. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(4), 599–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09399-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Y.-S., & GaÅ¡ević, D. (2017). Learning analytics in higher education—Challenges and policies: A review of eight learning analytics policies. Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D., Heath, D., & Huijser, H. (2016). Let’s talk learning analytics: A framework for implementation in relation to student retention. Online. Learning, 20(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2011). Support vector machines. In Data mining with rattle and R (pp. 293–304). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9890-3_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yau, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2020). Reflections on different learning analytics indicators for supporting study success. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education, 2(2), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v2i2.15639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Wosnitza, M., & Schroeder, U. (2015). A cluster analysis of MOOC stakeholder perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 12, 74–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Doo, M. Y. (2020). Self-directed learning in MOOCs: Exploring the relationships among motivation, self-monitoring, and self-management. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2073–2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09747-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Ifenthaler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ifenthaler, D. (2022). Data Mining and Analytics in the Context of Workplace Learning: Benefits and Affordances. In: Goller, M., Kyndt, E., Paloniemi, S., DamÅŸa, C. (eds) Methods for Researching Professional Learning and Development. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08517-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08518-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics