Skip to main content

Commemorating the First World War and Its Aftermath: Neo-Ottomanism, Gender, and the Politics of History in Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neo-Ottoman Imaginaries in Contemporary Turkey

Part of the book series: Modernity, Memory and Identity in South-East Europe ((MOMEIDSEE))

Abstract

This chapter discusses the Justice and Development Party’s (AKP) neo-Ottomanist history politics with a focus on commemoration and memorialisation of the First World War and the “Independence War” in Turkey. These commemorations refer to a mythical Ottoman past that stresses Sunni-Muslim-Turkish imperial legacy and the prominence of Muslim faith, solidarity, and martyrdom. While they undermine the hero cult around Mustafa Kemal and pluralize heroism by including women (and other male warriors), the commemorations consciously omit the existence of non-Muslim soldiers and ethnic violence against non-Muslims. The chapter traces incorporation of mythical narratives of women warriors into the centennial memorialisation in order to explore the shift in the construction of masculinities and femininities. Although the recognition of women’s participation in the war effort is a step towards pluralisation, women’s heroic representations reflect the same neo-Ottomanist obsession with “Muslim martyrdom” that rests on a masculinist notion of heroism, and a homogeneous ethno-religious identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “700. Yıl’a 2 milyon dolar” [2 million dollars for the 700th anniversary], Milliyet, 10 February 1999 https://www.milliyet.com.tr/the-others/700-yila-2-milyon-dolar-5257361 (30 June 2020)

  2. 2.

    On 19 January 2007, Hrant Dink, the founder and the chief editor of the Armenian-Turkish weekly newspaper AGOS and the most vocal and visible member of the remaining Armenian community in Turkey, was assassinated on a busy street in Istanbul in front of his office. The murder was widely reported, both in national and international media, putting the AKP government under pressure regarding its treatment of religious minorities (Ayata 2012, 14–15).

  3. 3.

    For a discussion of non-official centenary events, see Maksudyan 2019.

  4. 4.

    “Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan, Çanakkale Şehitler Abidesi’ni Ziyaret Etti” [President Erdoğan visited the monument of martyrs in Çanakkale], issued by the Office of Turkish President, 14 March 2015, https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/29707/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-canakkale-sehitler-abidesini-ziyaret-etti (16 May 2019).

  5. 5.

    “Turkey starts programme of events to mark Centenary of Gallipoli campaign”, Centenary News, 19 March 2015, http://www.centenarynews.com/article/turkey-starts-programme-of-events-to-mark-centenary-of-gallipoli-campaign (4 April 2019)

  6. 6.

    “Büyük Zafer 100. yılında törenlerle kutlandı” [The 100th anniversary of the big victory has been celebrated with ceremonies], Habertürk, 19 March 2015, https://www.haberturk.com/gundem/haber/1055358-canakkale-zaferinin-100-yildonumu-cesitli-etkinliklerle-anildi (16 May 2019).

  7. 7.

    http://basin.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR-132055/kultur-ve-turizm-bakani-omer-celik-18-mart-sehitleri-an-.html (16 May 2019).

  8. 8.

    “Başbakanlık’ta ‘Çanakkale Menüsü’” [The ‘Gallipoli menu’ at the office of the presidency], Yeni Şafak, 18 March 2015, https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/basbakanlikta-canakkale-menusu-2104817 (16 May 2019).

  9. 9.

    “Davutoğlu: Milletimiz mertçe savaşır” [Davutoğlu: Our people fight bravely], Yeni Şafak, 18 March 2015, https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/davutoglu-milletimiz-mertce-savasir-2104830 (16 May 2019).

  10. 10.

    Centenary News, 26 March 2015, http://www.centenarynews.com/article?id=3286 (4 April 2019).

  11. 11.

    “Çanakkale’de görkemli anma töreni” [Splendid commemoration in Çanakkale], TRT Haber, 24 April 2015, https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/canakkalede-gorkemli-anma-toreni-180633.html (16 May 2019).

  12. 12.

    The countries represented included the United Kingdom, Albania, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Djibouti, South Sudan, Ireland, Montenegro, Qatar, Macedonia, Mali, Niger, Pakistan, Senegal, Somalia, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Sudan, Australia, New Zealand, Moldova, Romania, and Syria.

    World leaders join Gallipoli commemoration in Turkey, Aljazeera, 24 April 2015, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/04/world-leaders-remember-gallipoli-centenary (16 May 2019).

  13. 13.

    “Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Tedavülden kaldırılıp tarihin tozlu raflarına havale edildiler” [President Erdoğan: They have been put on the dusty shelves of the past], Anadolu Ajansı (AA), 28 April 2016, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-tedavulden-kaldirilip-tarihin-tozlu-raflarina-havale-edildiler/563210?preview=1 (19 May 2016).

  14. 14.

    See, Kut’ül Amare, “Bağımsızlık ve hürriyet aşkının destanı” [An epic of love of independence and freedom], AA, 29 April 2016, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/kutul-amare-bagimsizlik-ve-hurriyet-askinin-destani/563536 (4 April 2019); “Kut’ül Amare zaferi Rusları da etkiledi” [Kut victory also influenced the Russians], AA, 29 April 2016, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/kutul-amare-zaferi-ruslari-da-etkiledi/563654 (4 April 2019); “Kut’ül Amare Zaferi’ni İngilizler bize un”utturdu [The English made us forget the victory of Kut], AA, 29 April 2016, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/kutul-amare-zaferini-ingilizler-bize-unutturdu/563531 (4 April 2019); “100. Yılında Unutulan Zafer: Kut’ül Amare” [Forgotten Victory in the 100th Anniversary: Kut’ul Amare] (infographic), AA, 29 April 2016, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/info/infografik/1019 (4 April 2019).

  15. 15.

    The Ministry of Culture and Tourism published a short clip for the centenary, “Kut’ül Amare hafızalardan silinmeyecek” [Kut’ül Amare won’t be erased from the memories], issued by AA, 29 April 2016, https://youtu.be/X91JjJ8NMlo (16 May 2019).

  16. 16.

    “Kut’ül Amare Zaferi’nin 100.yılı için görkemli anma programı” [Splendid commemoration for the 100th anniversary of the Kut’ül Amare victory] AA, 29 April 2016, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/kut-ul-amare-zaferinin-100yili-icin-gorkemli-anma-programi/563907 (16 May 2019).

  17. 17.

    Ibid.

  18. 18.

    “Tarihi 1919’dan başlatanlar milletimizin hasmıdır” [Those who start the history from 1919 are the enemy of our people], Yeni Şafak, 30 April 2016, https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/tarihi-1919dan-baslatanlar-milletimizin-hasmidir-2459219 (16 May 2019).

  19. 19.

    “Kitaplardan İsmet İnönü çıktı Kut-ül Amare girdi” [Ismet Inönü got erased from textbooks whereas Kut’ül Amare is now covered], Sözcü, 17 January 2017, https://www.sozcu.com.tr/2017/egitim/kitaplardan-ismet-inonu-cikti-kut-ul-amare-girdi-1626476/ (4 April 2019).

  20. 20.

    “Gençlik Şühedanın İzinde: Dumlupınar’dan Zafertepe’ye” [Youth On the Trail of Martyrs: From Dumlupınar to Zafertepe], T24, 20 August 2013, https://t24.com.tr/haber/genclik-suhedanin-izinde,237430 (4 April 2019).

  21. 21.

    “Binlerce Genç, Sarıkamış’ta Ecdadın İzinde Yürüdü” [Thousands of Youth walked on the trail of martyrs in Sarıkamış], Ministry of Youth and Sports, 5 January 2014, http://www.gsb.gov.tr/HaberDetaylari/3/3798/binlerce-genc-sarikamista-ecdadin-izinde-yurudu.aspx (4 April 2019).

  22. 22.

    “Sarıkamış Harekatının 100. yılında anma yürüyüşü” [Memorial march on the 100th anniversary of the Sarıkamış operation], CNN Türk, 5 January 2015, https://www.cnnturk.com/video/dunya/sarikamis-harekatinin-100-yilinda-anma-yuruyusu (4 April 2019).

  23. 23.

    “Sarıkamış Şehitleri 101. Yılında Anıldı” [Sarıkamış Martyrs were commemorated on the 101st Anniversary], Hürriyet, 6 January 2016, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/sarikamis-sehitleri-101-yilinda-anildi-37223066 (4 April 2019).

  24. 24.

    These were, “Asımın Nesli Asrın Yürüyüşünde” [Asım’s generation at the March of the Century], “Gök Allahuekber, Yer Allahuekber” [Sky Allahuekber, Earth Allahuekber]. “Asım’ın Nesli Asrın Yürüyüşünde”, İHA, 4 January 2015, https://www.iha.com.tr/haber-asimin-nesli-asrin-yuruyusunde-426210/ (16 May 2019).

  25. 25.

    On the 104th anniversary (2019), several ministers, soldiers, and thousands of people walked in heavy snow. See “Şehitler böyle anıldı” [Martyrs were remembered like this], CNN Türk, 6 January 2019, https://www.cnnturk.com/video/turkiye/sehitler-boyle-anildi (4 April 2019).

  26. 26.

    “Bursa Ulu Camii’nde Çanakkale Şehitleri İçin 253 Bin Hatim Duası Yapıldı” [253 hatim prayers have been prayed for the Gallipoli martyrs at the Ulu mosque in Bursa], Haberler, 18 March 2015, https://www.haberler.com/bursa-ulu-camii-nde-canakkale-sehitleri-icin-253-7087953-haberi/ (16 May 2019).

  27. 27.

    “Çanakkale’de görkemli anma töreni“ [Splendid commemoration in Çanakkale], TRT Haber, 24 April 2015, https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/canakkalede-gorkemli-anma-toreni-180633.html (16 May 2019).

  28. 28.

    “Turkish President Erdoğan’s Gallipoli ‘prayer’ stirs debate”, Hürriyet Daily News, 21 April 2015, www. hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-president-erdogans-gallipoli-prayer-stirs-debate-81350 (6 July 2020).

  29. 29.

    “Görkemle kutlansın” [May it be celebrated with splendour], Hürriyet, 17 April 2016, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/gorkemle-kutlansin-40089900 (4 April 2019).

  30. 30.

    “Tarihi 1919’dan başlatanlar milletimizin hasmıdır” [Those who start the history from 1919 are the enemy of our people], Yeni Şafak, 30 April 2016, https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/tarihi-1919dan-baslatanlar-milletimizin-hasmidir-2459219 (16 May 2019).

  31. 31.

    Ibid.

  32. 32.

    Ibid.

  33. 33.

    Armenian genocide centenary: “MEPs urge Turkey and Armenia to normalize relations, issued by European Parliament”, 15 April 2015, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20150413IPR41671/armenian-genocide-centenary-meps-urge-turkey-and-armenia-to-normalize-relations (6 July 2020).

  34. 34.

    “ A Conversation with Ahmet Davutoglu”, Council on Foreign Relations, 14 April 2010, https://www.cfr.org/event/conversation-ahmet-davutoglu-0 (27 March 2019); Murat Yetkin, “Davutoğlu: Ermeni diasporasıyla temas istiyoruz” [Davutoglu: We want contact with the Armenian diaspora], Radikal, 26 March 2010, http://www.radikal.com.tr/yazarlar/murat-yetkin/davutoglu-ermeni-diasporasiyla-temas-istiyoruz-987815/ (27 March 2019)

  35. 35.

    The day signifies the round-up of Armenian notables in Istanbul for deportation (and murder) in 1915.

  36. 36.

    The government passed a new law for the “Çanakkale Martyrs’ Day” commemorations, specifically indicating the date 18 March: “18 Mart Şehitler Günü ve 19 Eylül Gaziler Gününde Yapılacak Törenler Hakkında Yönetmelik”, http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/Metin.Aspx?MevzuatKod=7.5.5792&sourceXmlSearch=&MevzuatIliski=0 (27 March 2019)

  37. 37.

    Robert Fisk, “The Gallipoli centenary is a shameful attempt to hide the Armenian Holocaust”, 19 January 2015, The Independent, https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/the-gallipoli-centenary-is-a-shameful-attempt-to-hide-the-armenian-holocaust-9988227.html (27 March 2019)

  38. 38.

    Davutoğlu first used the concept in 2010, “A Conversation with Ahmet Davutoğlu”, Council on Foreign Relations, 14 April 2010, https://www.cfr.org/event/conversation-ahmet-davutoglu-0 (27 March 2019). Later, he wrote an article about the concept in 2014. Ahmet Davutoğlu, “Turkish-Armenian Relations: Is a ‘Just Memory’ possible?” Turkish Policy Quarterly (2014).

  39. 39.

    “Turkish PM offers condolences over 1915 Armenian massacre”, The Guardian, 23 April 2014, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/23/turkey-erdogan-condolences-armenian-massacre (27 March 2019)

  40. 40.

    “Press Release Regarding the Statements Delivered During the Liturgy in Vatican on April 12, 2015”, http://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_-110_-12-april-2015_-press-release-regarding-the-statements-delivered-during-the-liturgy-in-vatican-on-april-12_-2015.en.mfa (16 April 2019)

  41. 41.

    The figure was also “reproduced” for the ten-year commemorations of the Republic on 29 October 1933. In the “procession of villagers”, there was in the front a village woman who pulled an oxcart laden with boxes of munitions, with a gun on her shoulder (Öztürkmen 2001, 61). In fact, all through the 1930s the significant contribution of the “Turkish women” to the “national struggle” was always stressed. It was claimed that “she distinguished herself through bravery and service” during the war (Cumhuriyet 1934).

  42. 42.

    For a few examples see, “Şehit Şerife Bacı Anıtı” [Şerife Bacı Monument], İnebolu Belediyesi http://www.inebolu.bel.tr/inebolu-detay.asp?Id=102&ineboludetay=sehit-serife-baci-aniti; “Şehit Şerife Bacı Anıtı” [Martyr Şerife Bacı Monument], Seydiler, Kastamonu https://www.tskgv.org.tr/tr/sehit-serife-baci-sehitler-aniti; “Şerife Bacı Anıtı” [Şerife Bacı Monument], Ayazağa, İstanbul https://www.yasamgazetesi.com.tr/ozel-haber/bu-millet-senin-gibi-kahramanlara-minnettardir-serife-baci-aniti-ayazagada-acildi-h172061.html; “Şerife Bacı Anıtı” [Şerife Bacı Monument], Gaziosmanpaşa Istanbul http://www.gophaber.com/haber-sehit_serife_baci__kar_ustunde_cephane_tasiyor…-11765.html (7 July 2020)

  43. 43.

    “Tarihe adını kahramanlığıyla yazdıran Nene Hatun’un heykeli tartışmaya neden oldu” [The statue of Nene Hatun, who made her name written in history with her heroism, caused controversy], HaberTurk, 11 May 2017 https://www.haberturk.com/yerel-haberler/haber/53573170-tarihe-adini-kahramanligiyla-yazdiran-nene-hatunun-heykeli-tartismaya-neden-oldu (7 July2020)

  44. 44.

    Ibid.

  45. 45.

    “Nene Hatun heykelindeki 24 yıllık hata düzeltildi” [The mistake on Nene Hatun’s memorial has been corrected after 24 years], Hürriyet, 12 December 2018. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/nene-hatun-heykelindeki-24-yillik-hata-duzeltildi-41049068 (18 June 2020).

  46. 46.

    “Milli Mücadele Kahramanı Şehit Makbule Hanım” [The Hero of the Independence War Martyr Makbule Hanım], Gördes Kaymakamlığı, 27 June 2019. http://www.gordes.gov.tr/milli-mucadele-kahramani-sehit-makbule-hanim (8 July 2020).

  47. 47.

    “‘Kara Fatma’ya 59 yıl sonra anıt mezar” [After 59 years, there is a memorial tomb for ‘Kara Fatma’], Anadolu Ajansı, 14 June 2014 https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/yasam/kara-fatmaya-59-yil-sonra-anit-mezar/151164 (26 June 2020).

References

  • Adjemian, Boris and Mikaël Nichanian. 2013. Du centenaire de 14-18 à celui de 1915. Études arméniennes contemporaines 2: 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akçam, Taner. 2010. What Davutoğlu Fails to Understand. The Armenian Weekly, online. Accessed March 27, 2019. https://armenianweekly.com/2010/05/19/akcam-davutoglu/.

  • Aksakal, Mustafa. 2014. Introduction. International Journal of Middle East Studies 46 (4) [Special Issue on World War One]: 653–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altınay, Ayşe Gül. 2004. The Myth of the Military-Nation: Militarism, Gender, and Education in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arcan, H. Esra. 2017. Homeland Memory: Construction of Memory Politics and the Media in Turkey Related to World War I. In Current Debates in Public Relations, Cultural & Media Studies, ed. Emrah Doğan and Ercan Geçgin, 481–504. London: IJOPEC Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayata, Bilgin. 2012. Tolerance as a European Norm or an Ottoman Practice? An Analysis of Turkish Public Debates on the (Re)Opening of an Armenian Church in the Context of Turkey‘s EU Candidacy and Neo-Ottoman Revival. In KFG Working Paper Series 41, Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) “The Transformative Power of Europe. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aybak, Tunç. 2016. Geopolitics of Denial: Turkish State’s ‘Armenian Problem’. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 18 (2): 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayrak, Mehmet. 2002. Geçmişten Günümüze Kürt Kadını [Kurdish Women from the Past to the Present]. Ankara: Özge Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykut, Sibel. 2016. The Re-contextualization of the Battle of Gallipoli through Commemorations. Intercultural Understanding 6: 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, Joan. 2015. Commemoration in Australia: A Memory Orgy? Australian Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çayır, Kenan. 2015. Citizenship, Nationality and Minorities in Turkey’s Textbooks: From Politics of Non-recognition to ‘Difference Multiculturalism’. Comparative Education 51 (4): 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çetinsaya, Gökhan. 2017. Kut al-Amara. In 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War, ed. Ute Daniel, Peter Gatrell, Oliver Janz, Heather Jones, Jennifer Keene, Alan Kramer and Bill Nasson. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çiçek, M. Talha. 2012. Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi Ders Kitapları Çerçevesinde Türk Ulus Kimliği İnşası ve ‘Arap İhaneti’ [Turkish National Identity Formation and the ‘Arab Betrayal’ within the frame of school books of the Early Republican Era]. Divan: Disiplinlerarası Çalışmalar Dergisi 32: 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çolak, Yılmaz. 2006. Ottomanism vs Kemalism. Collective Memory and Cultural Pluralism in 1990s Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies 42 (2): 587–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumhuriyet. 1934. Bugünkü Türk Kadını: İstiklâl Harbindeki Yararlık ve Cesaretile Temayüz Etmiştir [Turkish Woman Today: She Distinguished Herself through Service and Bravery during the Independence War], July 25, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diler, Fatih Gökhan. 2016. Derdimiz tüm olayı 1915’e kilitlemeden, o dört yıllık zaman diliminde anlamak [Our Problem is Understanding These 4 Years before Making Everything About 1915] AGOS, online: Accessed March 27, 2019. http://www.agos.com.tr/tr/yazi/15087/derdimiz-tum-olayi-1915-e-kilitlemeden-o-dort-yillik-zaman-diliminde-anlamak.

  • Doroll, Courtney Michelle. 2015. The Spatial Politics of Turkey’s Justice and Development Party (AK Party): On Erdoğanian New Ottomanism. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation. Tucson: University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergin, Murat, and Yağmur Karakaya. 2017. Between Neo-Ottomanism and Ottomania: Navigating State-Led and Popular Cultural Representations of the Past. New Perspectives on Turkey 56: 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher-Onar, Nora. 2009. Echoes of a Universalism Lost: Rival Representations of the Ottomans in Today’s Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies 45 (2): 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlanetto, Elena. 2015. ‘Imagine a Country Where We Are All Equal’: Imperial Nostalgia in Turkey and Elif Shafak’s Ottoman Utopia. In Post-Empire Imaginaries?: Anglophone Literature, History, and the Demise of Empires, ed. Barbara Buchenau, Virginia Richter and Marijke Denger, 159–180. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göknar, Erdağ. 2006. Orhan Pamuk and the ‘Ottoman’ Theme. World Literature Today 80 (6): 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gür, Faik. 2013. Sculpting the Nation in Early Republican Turkey. Historical Research 86 (232): 342–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürcan, Metin and Robert Johnson, ed. 2016. The Gallipoli Campaign: The Turkish Perspective. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hürtaş, Sibel. 2015. Gallipoli Centenary Marks Another Snub for Turkish Minorities. Al-Monitor, online. Accessed July 5, 2020. https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/03/turkey-gallipoli-war-other-m.html#ixzz6RRYVBtNd.

  • Kancı, Tuba and Ayşe Gül Altınay. 2007. Educating Little Soldiers and Little Ayşes: Militarised and Gendered Citizenship in Turkish Textbooks. In Education in ‘Multicultural’ Societies. Turkish and Swedish Perspectives, ed. Marie Carlson, Annika Rabo and Fatma Gök, 51–70. London & New York: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaca, Banu. 2019. ‘When Everything Has Been Said Before…’: Art, Dispossession, and the Economies of Forgetting in Turkey. In Women Mobilizing Memory, ed. Ayşe Gül Altınay, María José Contreras, Marianne Hirsch, Jean Howard, Banu Karaca and Alisa Solomon, 285–302. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakuş, Emel, Esra Mutlu and Yelkin Diker Coşkun. 2018. Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği Açısından Öğretim Programlarının İncelenmesi [Analysing Curricula in terms of Gender Equalityity]. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi 17: 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konuk, Kader. 2011. Istanbul on Fire: End-of-Empire Melancholy in Orhan Pamuk’s Istanbul. The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory 86 (4): 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser, Klaus. 2002. Public Monuments in Kemalist and Post-Kemalist-Turkey. Journal of Turkish Studies (Essays in Honour of Barbara Flemming. Guest Ed. Jan Schmidt). 26 (2): 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. War Memorials and Cemeteries in Turkey. In The First World War as Remembered in the Countries of the Eastern Mediterranean, ed. Olaf Farschid, 183–197. Egon: Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutluata, Zeynep. 2006. Gender and War during the Late Ottoman and Early Republican Periods: The Case of Black Fatma(s). Master Thesis. Istanbul: Sabancı University.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Geç Osmanlı ve Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi’nde Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Savaş: Kara Fatma(lar) [Gender and War during the late Ottoman Empire and the Early Republican Turkey: the Kara Fatma(s)]. Feminist Yaklaşımlar [Feminist Approaches] 2: 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leupold, David. 2017. Authentische Gewaltgeschichten oder verzerrte Spiegelbilder? Die türkische und armenische Geschichtsdeutung von 1915 im Lichte des Nationalmythos. In Geschichte als Ressource. Politische Dimensionen historischer Authentizität, ed. Barbara Christophe, Christoph Kohl and Heike Liebau, 211–240. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, David. 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüküslü, Demet. 2016. Creating a Pious Generation: Youth and Education Policies of the AKP in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (4): 637–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, Jenny. 2017. The Gallipoli Centenary: An International Perspective. In War Memory and Commemoration, ed. Brad West, 89–106. New York & London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maksudyan, Nazan. 2019. Centenary (Turkey). In 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War, ed. Ute Daniel, Peter Gatrell, Oliver Janz, Heather Jones, Jennifer Keene, Alan Kramer, and Bill Nasson. Berlin: Freie Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliyet. 2004. Kurtuluş Savaşının Elifleri [The Elifs of the Independence War]. Milliyet (30 Ağustos Özel Sayısı), August 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Amy. 2011. The Ottoman Legacy: Urban Geographies, National Imaginaries, and Global Discourses of Tolerance. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 31 (1): 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, George L. 1990. Fallen Soldiers: Reshaping the Memory of the World Wars. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Joane. 1998. Masculinity and Nationalism: Gender and Sexuality in the Making of Nations. Ethnic and Racial Studies 21 (2): 242–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navaro-Yashin, Yael. 2002. Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onaran, Burak. 2022. New Histories for a New Turkey: The First Battle of Kut (1916) and the Reshaping of the Ottoman Past. In The Politics of Culture in Contemporary Turkey, ed. Pierre Hecker, Ivo Furman and Kaya Akyıldız. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öztürkmen, Arzu. 2001. Celebrating National Holidays in Turkey: History and Memory. New Perspectives on Turkey 25: 47–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riexinger, Martin Thomas. 2014. The Ottoman Empire as Harmonious Utopia: A Historical Myth and its Function. In Islamic Myths and Memories, ed. Izchak Weismann, Mark Sedgwick and Ulrika Mårtensson, 35–52. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selek, Pınar. 2012. Sürüne Sürüne Erkek Olmak [Becoming a Man Through Boot Camp] Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şimşek, Ahmet, and Emre Çakmakçı. 2019. Cumhuriyet Dönemi İlkokul Tarih Ders Kitaplarında Millî Mücadele [The Independence War in Primary School History Textbooks in the Republican Period]. CTAD 15 (30): 189–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sınmaz Sönmez, Cahide. 2015. Çanakkale Savaşlarını Anma ve Kutlama Etkinlikleri (1916–1938) [Commemorations of the Gallipoli Campaign (1916–1938)]. Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı 19: 173–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, Laura and Sandra Via. 2010. Introduction. In Gender, War and Militarism: Feminist Perspectives, ed. Laura Sjoberg and Sandra Via. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi Öğretim Programı. [Social Sciences Curricula] 2018. Ankara: T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, online: Accessed July 9, 2020. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812103847686-SOSYAL%20B%C4%B0LG%C4%B0LER%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%20.pdf.

  • Sümbüloğlu, Nurseli Yeşim. 2013. Giriş: Türkiye’de Militarizm, Milliyetçilik ve Erkek(lik)lere Dair Bir Çerçeve [Introduction: A Frame About Militarism, Nationalism and Men/Masculinities in Turkey] In Erkek Millet Asker Millet: Türkiye’de Militarizm, Milliyetçilik ve Erkek(lik)ler [Male Nation Soldier Nation: Militarim, Nationalism and Men/Masculinities in Turkey], ed. Nurseli Yeşim Sünbüloğlu. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.C İnkılap Tarihi ve Atatürkçülük Dersi Öğretim Programı. [The Curriculum for the History of the Revolution and Kemalism] 2018. Ankara: T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları, online. Accessed July 9, 2020. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812104016155-%C4%B0NKILAP%20TAR%C4%B0H%C4%B0%20VE%20ATAT%C3%9CRK%C3%87%C3%9CL%C3%9CK%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI.pdf.

  • Thys-Şenocak, Lucienne. 2018. Divided Spaces, Contested Pasts: The Heritage of the Gallipoli Peninsula. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tokdoğan, Nagehan. 2018. Yeni Osmanlıcılık: Hınç, Nostalji, Narsisizm [Neo-Ottomanism: Resentment, Nostalgia, Narcissism]. Istanbul: İletişim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türkyılmaz, Yektan. 2016. Tarih Vertigosu, Hafıza Hipnozu: Nar Niyetiyle Hatırlamak [Vertigo of History, Memory Hypnosis: Remembering ‘In Lieu of a Pomegranate’]. AGOS, online. Accessed March 27, 2019. http://www.agos.com.tr/tr/yazi/15089/tarih-vertigosu-hafiza-hipnozu-nar-niyetiyle-hatirlamak.

  • White, Jenny. 2014. Muslim Nationalism and the New Turks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yanıkdağ, Yücel. 2017. Ottoman Empire/Middle East. In 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War, ed. Ute Daniel, Peter Gatrell, Oliver Janz, Heather Jones, Jennifer Keene, Alan Kramer and Bill Nasson. Berlin: Freie Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz, M. Hakan. 1998. Turkish Identity and Foreign Policy in Flux. The Rise of Neo-Ottomanism. Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies 7 (12): 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Social and Intellectual Origins of Neo-Ottomanism: Searching for a Post-National Vision. Die Welt des Islams 56 (3–4): 438–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yetkin, Eren Yıldırım. 2022. Violence and Genocide in Kurdish Memory: Exploring the Remembrance of the Armenian Genocide through Life Stories. Leverkusen-Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazan Maksudyan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maksudyan, N., Alkan, H. (2023). Commemorating the First World War and Its Aftermath: Neo-Ottomanism, Gender, and the Politics of History in Turkey. In: Raudvere, C., Onur, P. (eds) Neo-Ottoman Imaginaries in Contemporary Turkey. Modernity, Memory and Identity in South-East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08023-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08023-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08022-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08023-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics