Skip to main content

Behavioural Factors: Cognitive Biases and Dissonance, Anomie, and Alienation (Or How We Humans Mess Things Up)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uncertainty Deconstructed

Part of the book series: Science, Technology and Innovation Studies ((STAIS))

Abstract

The chapter addresses how human behaviour influences our ability to make objective decisions when faced with (perceived) uncertainty. The often unsettling nature of uncertainty allows for a variety of behavioural conditions to play out. In turn these conditions act as barriers when attempting to assess objectively the nature of uncertainty. These behavioural conditions include a whole range of cognitive biases, misapplied heuristics, cognitive dissonance, as well as social anomie (and alienation). An overall proposition of this book is that uncertainty is really a “known-unknown” and therefore can be managed. However, it is argued that the manifestation of those behavioural conditions highlighted above, such as cognitive biases, tends to drive our decision-making processes into accepting all too readily that uncertainty is an “unknown-unknown” which in turn absolves decision-makers from responsibility when things go wrong.

All may not therefore be as it would appear. We must not let our assumptions, our perceptions and “mental maps” get in the way of seeing a new, unfolding reality……It is impossible therefore to start to constructively think about a world in transition without a debate that challenges deep assumptions. Such a debate must distil fact and opinion, grounded in constructive discussion, from a mirage of convenient dreams or outdated rules. The results of this distillation process may not be totally benign, but it is better to face up to the unpleasant rather than ignore it.

Robert W. Davies “The Era of Global Transition” Palgrave Macmillan (2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Durkheim, E. (1897). Le Suicide: Etude de sociologie. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times. (2011, February 10). Why can’t economists predict disruptive events. Gavyn Davies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science. Annual Review of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 13(12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowing, N., & Langdon, C. (2017). Thinking the unthinkable. John Catt Educational 2018 following a draft for CIMA – Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (2008, November 26). Predictive models “Blown off course by butterflies”. Financial Times, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, R. D.. Extract from page 15, 16 & 17 – Chapter 1 (1967). Persons and experience. “The politics of experience and the bird of paradise”. Published by Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S, “If we cannot forecast how can we plan?” (Makridakis, 1981), and “A chronology of the last six recessions” (Makridakis, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis, S., & Taleb, N. (2009). Living in a world of low levels of predictability. International Journal of Forecasting, 25(4) Elsevier BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau, S. (2019). The metric society. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction. Penguin, Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padbury, P. (2019). An overview of the horizons foresight method using system based-scenarios and the “inner game” of foresight. Chief Futurist, Policy Horizons, Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pherson, R. H. (2019). Handbook of analytic tools & technique (5th ed.). Published Pherson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkey, O. H., & Pilkey-Jarvis, L. (2007). Useless arithmetic – Why environmental scientists can’t predict the future. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, R. (2016, November 14). Social media is blinding us to other points of view. CBC News.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2013, May). Cognitive biases are bad for business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert political judgement. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanston, J. H. (2007). P40 Section 3 in “Technology forecasting – An aid to effective technology management”. Technology Futures Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachter-Boettcher, S. (2017). Technically wrong. W. Norton & Co Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Garvey, B. (2022). Behavioural Factors: Cognitive Biases and Dissonance, Anomie, and Alienation (Or How We Humans Mess Things Up). In: Uncertainty Deconstructed. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08007-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics