Abstract
The chapter addresses how human behaviour influences our ability to make objective decisions when faced with (perceived) uncertainty. The often unsettling nature of uncertainty allows for a variety of behavioural conditions to play out. In turn these conditions act as barriers when attempting to assess objectively the nature of uncertainty. These behavioural conditions include a whole range of cognitive biases, misapplied heuristics, cognitive dissonance, as well as social anomie (and alienation). An overall proposition of this book is that uncertainty is really a “known-unknown” and therefore can be managed. However, it is argued that the manifestation of those behavioural conditions highlighted above, such as cognitive biases, tends to drive our decision-making processes into accepting all too readily that uncertainty is an “unknown-unknown” which in turn absolves decision-makers from responsibility when things go wrong.
All may not therefore be as it would appear. We must not let our assumptions, our perceptions and “mental maps” get in the way of seeing a new, unfolding reality……It is impossible therefore to start to constructively think about a world in transition without a debate that challenges deep assumptions. Such a debate must distil fact and opinion, grounded in constructive discussion, from a mirage of convenient dreams or outdated rules. The results of this distillation process may not be totally benign, but it is better to face up to the unpleasant rather than ignore it.
Robert W. Davies “The Era of Global Transition” Palgrave Macmillan (2012).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Durkheim, E. (1897). Le Suicide: Etude de sociologie. Routledge.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Financial Times. (2011, February 10). Why can’t economists predict disruptive events. Gavyn Davies.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science. Annual Review of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 13(12).
Gowing, N., & Langdon, C. (2017). Thinking the unthinkable. John Catt Educational 2018 following a draft for CIMA – Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
Kay, J. (2008, November 26). Predictive models “Blown off course by butterflies”. Financial Times, p. 13.
Laing, R. D.. Extract from page 15, 16 & 17 – Chapter 1 (1967). Persons and experience. “The politics of experience and the bird of paradise”. Published by Penguin Books.
Makridakis S, “If we cannot forecast how can we plan?” (Makridakis, 1981), and “A chronology of the last six recessions” (Makridakis, 1982).
Makridakis, S., & Taleb, N. (2009). Living in a world of low levels of predictability. International Journal of Forecasting, 25(4) Elsevier BV.
Mau, S. (2019). The metric society. Polity.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5).
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction. Penguin, Random House.
Padbury, P. (2019). An overview of the horizons foresight method using system based-scenarios and the “inner game” of foresight. Chief Futurist, Policy Horizons, Government of Canada.
Pherson, R. H. (2019). Handbook of analytic tools & technique (5th ed.). Published Pherson Associates.
Pilkey, O. H., & Pilkey-Jarvis, L. (2007). Useless arithmetic – Why environmental scientists can’t predict the future. Columbia University Press.
Pringle, R. (2016, November 14). Social media is blinding us to other points of view. CBC News.
Taylor, J. (2013, May). Cognitive biases are bad for business.
Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert political judgement. Princeton University Press.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Vanston, J. H. (2007). P40 Section 3 in “Technology forecasting – An aid to effective technology management”. Technology Futures Inc.
Wachter-Boettcher, S. (2017). Technically wrong. W. Norton & Co Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garvey, B. (2022). Behavioural Factors: Cognitive Biases and Dissonance, Anomie, and Alienation (Or How We Humans Mess Things Up). In: Uncertainty Deconstructed. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08007-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08007-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08006-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08007-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)