Skip to main content

Scenario Derivatives First, Second, and Third Order Scenarios: Generic (Landscape) Variables

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uncertainty Deconstructed

Part of the book series: Science, Technology and Innovation Studies ((STAIS))

  • 265 Accesses

Abstract

It is rare for scenarios to be stand-alone and discrete: rather they contain any number of linked downstream sub-scenarios called derivatives. The bigger the initial primary event the more likely that it will have multiple ramifications generating spin-offs of varying degrees of intensity and visibility. Yet, the subsidiary status of derivative scenarios makes them more dangerous as they are often overlooked due to the dominance of the primary event and where the impact of unintended and uncertain consequences of initial actions generated by the first order scenario can play out. A number of MTTs are introduced which help the analyst determine what, when, and where these derivative scenarios can occur. A variety of qualitative and quantitative methods such as horizon scanning, mind maps, PESTLE and dynamic PESTLE, hypothesis generation and analysis, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) are highlighted. The chapter thus posits that only constant scanning can mitigate unconsidered surprises hidden within derivative scenarios.

As I write, our much vaunted windmills aren’t turning because it isn’t very windy, and we can’t rely on coal-fired power stations because they’re all being closed down. And we haven’t been able to build any new nuclear reactors because of some newts. Which makes us reliant on gas. And that’s a problem because a burly Russian with a beef about something or other is standing on the hose that delivers natural gas from the Urals to Europe. And to make matters worse for our energy needs, the cable that brings electricity from France to Britain was damaged by a fire, and it won’t be mended for the best part of a year …… .

Jeremy Clarkson—Motoring Journalist and Farmer—Sunday Times October 2021.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 50 Minutes.com. (2015, September). PESTLE analysis: Understand and plan for your business environment: Prepare the best strategies in advance (Management & Marketing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the mind map study technique. Medical Education, 36(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, N., & Neil, M. (2013). Risk assessment and decision analysis with Bayesian networks. published by CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futures Toolkit. (2017). The futures toolkit. UK Government Office for Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer Jr, R. J., & Pherson, R. H. (2010). Structured analytic techniques for intelligence analysis. CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreig, M. L. (2001). A tutorial of Bayesian belief networks: Surveillance system division – Electronics and surveillance research laboratory – DSTO-TN-0403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pherson, R. H. (2019). Handbook of analytic tools & techniques (5th ed.). R H Pherson, The Analyst’s Bookshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pherson, R. H., & Schwartz. (2008). Handbook of analytic tools and techniques. Pherson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidd, M. (1996). Tools for thinking (p. 40). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. RWS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, S. (2003). Introduction (from Bayesian belief networks. Australian Institute of Marine Science. Prepared for CSIRO Centre for Complex Systems Science. 1 CSIRO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Garvey, B. (2022). Scenario Derivatives First, Second, and Third Order Scenarios: Generic (Landscape) Variables. In: Uncertainty Deconstructed. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08007-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics