Skip to main content

Ontology Engineering Methodologies: State of the Art

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things (BDIoT 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 489))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 455 Accesses

Abstract

Recently, the use of ontologies has become more popular in both academia and industry fields. However, many ontology projects have failed due to, at least in part, a lack of discipline in the development process; that is, the poorly specified, underspecified, or lack of requirements and evaluation criteria. Therefore, it is reasonable to ask: what is the most prominent methodology to develop an ontology? To answer this question in this paper, we reviewed the most prominent ontology engineering methodologies, and analyzed the most mature and suitable approaches for the development of ontology based on a set of criteria. We also provide a better understanding of ontology engineering methodology, most used ontology engineering methodologies, current prominent methods, and future research scope for standard ontology engineering methodology. This study shows that no methodology enjoys consensus among the community, and none of these methodologies are mature enough and without limitations. Finally, we concluded that Krisnadhi & Hitzler methodology remains very practical and much more detailed in a step-by-step manner. The fact that it is based on ontology design patterns ensures that there is a trade-off between interoperability, on the one hand, and over-commitment and conflicting requirements on the other hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J., Benjamins, V.R.: What are ontologies, and why do we need them? Intell. Syst. Their Appl. IEEE 14, 20–26 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Studer, R., Benjamins, V.R., Fensel, D.: Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data Knowl. Eng. 25(1), 161–197 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jean, S., Pierra, G., Ait-Ameur, Y.: Domain ontologies: a database-oriented analysis. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J., Pedrosa, V. (eds.) Web Information Systems and Technologies. LNBIP, vol. 1, pp. 238–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74063-6_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Tamma, V., Dragoni, M., Gonçalves, R., Ławrynowicz, A. (eds.): OWLED 2015. LNCS, vol. 9557. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33245-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Keet, M.: An Introduction to Ontology Engineering, vol. 1. Maria Keet (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aminu, E.F., Oyefolahan, I.O., Abdullahi, M.B., Salaudeen, M.T.: A review on ontology development methodologies for developing ontological knowledge representation systems for various domains. Int. J. Inf. Eng. Electron. Bus. 12(2), 28–39 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Subhashini, R., Akilandeswari, J.: A survey on ontology construction methodologies. Int. J. Enterp. Comput. Bus. Syst. 1(1), 60–72 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suarez-Figueroa, M.C., et al.: NeOn methodology for building contextualized ontology networks. NeOn Deliv. D 5, 150 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iqbal, R., Murad, M.A.A., Mustapha, A., Sharef, N.M.: An analysis of ontology engineering methodologies: a literature review. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 6(16), 2993–3000 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grüninger, M., Fox, M.S.: Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, IJCAI-95, Montreal (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Corcho, O., Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Data Knowl. Eng. 46(1), 41–64 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Juristo, N.: Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arp, R., Smith, B., Spear, A.D.: Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. The MIT Press (2015). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262527811.001.0001

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdelghany, A.S., Darwish, N.R., Hefni, H.A.: An agile methodology for ontology development. Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst. 12(2), 170–181 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peroni, S.: A simplified agile methodology for ontology development. In: Dragoni, M., Poveda-Villalón, M., Jimenez-Ruiz, E. (eds.) OWL: Experiences and Directions – Reasoner Evaluation, pp. 55–69. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54627-8_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Axelsson, J., Papatheocharous, E., Nyfjord, J., Törngren, M.: Notes on agile and safety-critical development. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 41(2), 23–26 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hitzler, P.: Modeling with ontology design patterns: chess games as a worked example. Ontol Eng. Ontol. Des. Patterns Found. Appl. 25, 3 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hitzler, P., Krisnadhi, A.: A Tutorial on Modular Ontology Modeling with Ontology Design Patterns: The cooking recipes ontology. ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv180808433 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elhassouni, J., El Qadi, A., Bazzi, M., El Haziti, M.: Modeling with ontologies design patterns: credit scorecard as a case study. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 17(1), 429 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elhassouni, J., El Qadi, A., El madani El alami, Y., El Haziti, M.: The implementation of credit risk scorecard using ontology design patterns and BCBS 239. Cybern. Inf. Technol. 20(2), 93–104 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shimizu, C., Hirt, Q., Hitzler, P.: Modl: A modular Ontology Design Library. ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv190405405 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford knowledge systems laboratory technical report KSL-01-05 and … (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobson, I., Christerson, M.J., Jonsson, P., Vergaard, G.: Object-Oriented Software Engineering, A Use Case Driven Approach. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobson, I., Spence, I., Bittner, K.: USE-CASE 2.0. The Guide to Succeeding with Use Cases, Ivar Jacobson International sa. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M.: The NeOn methodology framework: a scenario-based methodology for ontology development. Appl. Ontol. 10(2), 107–145 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jalil ElHassouni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

ElHassouni, J., Qadi, A.E. (2022). Ontology Engineering Methodologies: State of the Art. In: Lazaar, M., Duvallet, C., Touhafi, A., Al Achhab, M. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things. BDIoT 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 489. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07969-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics