Skip to main content

Addressing Health Equity: Sources, Impact and Mitigation of Biased Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Healthcare Information Management Systems

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML) and advanced analytics can yield important contributions to our understanding of how current systems and practices contribute to health disparities. They can also inform the development of equitable interventions, policies and decision-making in clinical care. This can only happen if we understand and address the biases in our healthcare system today, and how they are reflected in the data we use to develop and train AI systems. In this chapter, we will provide an overview of healthcare data sources and describe the ways in which the different types of data can be biased. We will discuss the impact of biased data, citing specific examples of how biased data has led to erroneous results or decisions, with particular focus on health equity and disparities. We will then describe strategies and techniques to both improve data prospectively, and to mitigate biases in how we use and interpret existing data to inform decision-making in healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, Kerner JF, Sistrunk S, Gersh BJ, et al. The effect of race and sex on physicians’ recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(8):618–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Medicine Committee on U, Eliminating R, Ethnic Disparities in Health C, Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marcelin JR, Siraj DS, Victor R, Kotadia S, Maldonado YA. The impact of unconscious bias in healthcare: how to recognize and mitigate it. J Infect Dis. 2019;220(220 Suppl 2):S62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Freedman LS, Simon R, Foulkes MA, Friedman L, Geller NL, Gordon DJ, et al. Inclusion of women and minorities in clinical trials and the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993--the perspective of NIH clinical trialists. Control Clin Trials. 1995;16(5):277–85; discussion 86–9, 93–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Devlin A, Gonzalez E, Ramsey F, Esnaola N, Fisher S. The effect of discrimination on likelihood of participation in a clinical trial. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020;7(6):1124–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366(6464):447–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahmood SS, Levy D, Vasan RS, Wang TJ. The Framingham Heart Study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: a historical perspective. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):999–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Splansky GL, Corey D, Yang Q, Atwood LD, Cupples LA, Benjamin EJ, et al. The Third Generation Cohort of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study: design, recruitment, and initial examination. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(11):1328–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gijsberts CM, Groenewegen KA, Hoefer IE, Eijkemans MJ, Asselbergs FW, Anderson TJ, et al. Race/ethnic differences in the associations of the Framingham risk factors with carotid IMT and cardiovascular events. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vyas DA, Eisenstein LG, Jones DS. Hidden in plain sight - reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(9):874–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ntoutsi E, Fafalios P, Gadiraju U, Iosifidis V, Nejdl W, Vidal ME, et al. Bias in data‐driven artificial intelligence systems—an introductory survey. Wiley Interdiscipl Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2020;10(3):e1356.

    Google Scholar 

  12. FitzGerald C, Hurst S. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leavy S, O’Sullivan B, Siapera E. Data, power and bias in artificial intelligence. arXiv. 2020:200807341.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Challen R, Denny J, Pitt M, Gompels L, Edwards T, Tsaneva-Atanasova K. Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(3):231–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parikh RB, Teeple S, Navathe AS. Addressing bias in artificial intelligence in health care. JAMA. 2019;322:2377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee CS, Lee AY. Clinical applications of continual learning machine learning. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(6):e279–e81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Amodei D, Olah C, Steinhardt J, Christiano P, Schulman J, Mané D. Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv. 2016:160606565.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eileen Koski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koski, E., Saiz, F.S., Park, Y., South, B.R., Scheufele, E.L., Dankwa-Mullan, I. (2022). Addressing Health Equity: Sources, Impact and Mitigation of Biased Data. In: Kiel, J.M., Kim, G.R., Ball, M.J. (eds) Healthcare Information Management Systems. Health Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07912-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07912-2_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07911-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07912-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics