Skip to main content

Abstract

The generation of solid waste (SW) has a direct connection with the monetary status of individuals and shows in terms of gross domestic product (GDP)/gross national income (GNI). The high-income countries (HICs) have shown a lingering generation of solid waste, mainly municipal solid waste (MSW). The MSW of HICs include organic biodegradable, paper, plastic metal, glass, and other inert waste and reported higher for the United States of America (50.70%), Canada (47%), Germany (22%), Canada (13%), Germany (12%), and Hungary (35%). The solid waste generation (kg/capita/day) was reported remarkably higher in Italy (59.83), followed by Australia (8.47), Switzerland (8.08), Hong Kong (7.18), Denmark, Singapore, and Lithuania. The treatment processes such as composting, landfilling or controlled dumping, recycling, and incineration were commonly followed by the HICs. The HICs are spending 82–250 USD/ton, 70–200 USD/ton, 65–150 USD/ton, 40–100 USD/ton, and 35–90 USD/ton for waste collection, waste to energy conversation, anaerobic digestion, sanitary landfill, and composting, respectively. The HICs such as the USA, Canada, Scotland, UK, Northern Ireland, and European Union have strict guidelines and rules for landfilling. The US Environmental Protection Agency has restricted the open dumping process by enforcing laws, administrative actions, and punishments with penalties. The strict restrictions are also effected to dispose bio-hazardous materials and substances generated from demolition/renovation of the building. Other side, adoption of emerging techniques plays significant role in circular economy for high-income countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aboyeji OS, Eigbokhan SF (2016) Evaluations of groundwater contamination by leachates around Olusosun open dumpsite in Lagos metropolis, southwest Nigeria. J Environ Manag 183(1):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Assamoi B, Lawryshyn Y (2012) The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion. Waste Manag 32:1019–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan R, Healy M, Morrison L, Hynes S, Norton D, Clifford E (2016) Management of landfill leachate: the legacy of European Union directives. Waste Manag 55:355–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnley S (2001) The impact of the European landfill directive on waste management in the United Kingdom. Resour Conserv Recycl 32:349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calaf-Forn M, Roca J, Puig-Ventosa I (2014) Cap and trade schemes on waste management: a case study of the Landfill allowance trading scheme (LATS) in England. Waste Manag 34:919–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2012) Environmental Protection Agency. MSW characterization methodology. [Cited 2021 August 30]

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher K (2006) Impact of energy from waste and recycling policy on UK greenhouse gas emissions. Environment Resource Management for Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Prieiga per interneta: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoscience Australia (2017) Waste management facilities. Geoscience Australia, Australian Government. ACT, Australia. Available via DIALOG, https://data.gov.au/dataset/waste-management-facilities. Accessed 10 Nov 2020

  • https://www.ecos.org/members/illinois/. Accessed 28 Mar 2020

  • https://www.energy.ca.gov/almanac/renewables_data/biomass/. Accessed 28 Mar 2019

  • https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/sdut-miramar-landfill-lifespan-zero-waste-compaction-2015aug05-story.html. Accessed 28 Mar 2021

  • Jha A, Singh G, Gupta P (2011) Sustainable municipal solid waste management in low-income group of cities: a review. Trop Ecol 52:123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Johari A, Ahmed SI, Hashim H, Alkali H, Ramli M (2012) Economic and environmental benefits of landfill gas from municipal solid waste in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(5):2907–2912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyani KA, Pandey KK (2014) Waste to energy status in India: a short review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 31:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Samadder SR (2017) A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 69(2017):407–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent A, Bakas I, Clavreul BA, Niero M, Gentile E, Hauschilda MZ, Christensen TH (2014) Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – part I: lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Manag 34:573–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaridi K (2009) Implementing the landfill directive in Greece: problems, perspectives and lessons to be learned. Geogr J 175:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munir MT, Ahmad M, Nasr AT, Carter S (2021) Municipal solid waste-to-energy processing for a circular economy in New Zealand. Renew Sust Energ Rev 145:111080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omari AM, Kichonge BN, John GR, Njau KN, Mtui PL (2014) Potential of municipal solid waste, as renewable energy source – a case study of Arusha, Tanzania. Int J Renew Energ Technol Res 3(6):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey LMS, Shukla SK (2019) An insight into waste management in Australia with a focus on landfill technology and liner leak detection. J Clean Prod 225:1147–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandyaswargo AH, Onoda H, Nagata K (2012) Energy recovery potential and life cycle impact assessment of municipal solid waste management technologies in Asian countries using ELP model. Energy Environ Eng 3:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrot L, Sotamenou J, Dia BK (2009) Municipal solid waste management in Africa: strategies and livelihoods in Yaounde, Cameroon. Waste Manag 29:986–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires A, Martinho MG, Silveira A (2007) Could MBT plants be the solution of fulfill landfill directive targets in Portugal. Proceedings of International Symposium MBT 2007. 22–24 May, Cuvillier Verlag, 63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai S, Sawell SE, Chandler AJ et al (1996) World trends in municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag 16(5–6):341–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharholy M, Ahmad K, Mahmood G, Trivedi RC (2008) Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities – a review. Waste Manag 28(2):459–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shekdar AV (2009) Sustainable solid waste management: an integrated approach for Asian countries. Waste Manag 29:1438–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.025

  • Stanic-Maruna I, Fellner J (2012) Solid waste management in Croatia in response to the European landfill directive. Waste Manag Res 30(8):825–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12444897. Epub 2012 May 21. PMID: 22615201

  • Shi H, Mahinpey N, Aqsha A, Silbermann R (2016) Characterization, thermochemical conversion studies, and heating value modeling of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 48:34–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2015) United Nations Environment Programme. Global waste management outlook. [Cited 2021Augt 24]

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat United Nations Centre for Human Settlement (2010) Solid waste in the world’s cities–third global report on water and sanitation in the world’s cities. Earthscan Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • US-EPA (1976) Summary of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. 42 U.S.C.x6901 et seq. https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-resource-conservation-and-recovery-act. Accessed 29 Mar 2021

  • USEPA (2018) Landfill methane outreach program. www.epa.gov/lmop.

  • Wang D, Tang YT, Long G, Higgitt D, He J, Robinson D (2020) Future improvements on performance of an EU landfill directive driven municipal solid waste management for a city in England. Waste Manag 102:452–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DC, Rodic L, Modak P, Soos R, Carpintero A, Velis K et al (2015) Global waste management outlook

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012) What a waste a global review of solid waste management. Urban development series knowledge paper no. 15, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2015) Country and lending groups. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups. 16 Apr 2021

  • Yadav P, Samadder SR (2017) A global prospective of income distribution and its effect on lifecycle assessment of municipal solid waste management: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:9123–9141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debananda Roy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roy, D., Tarafdar, A. (2022). Solid Waste Management and Landfill in High-Income Countries. In: Pathak, P., Palani, S.G. (eds) Circular Economy in Municipal Solid Waste Landfilling: Biomining & Leachate Treatment . Radionuclides and Heavy Metals in the Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07785-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics