Skip to main content

A Multi-stage Machine Learning Methodology for Health Monitoring of Largely Unobserved Structures Under Varying Environmental Conditions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM 2022)

Abstract

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) via data-driven techniques can be based upon vibrations acquired by sensor networks. However, technical and economic reasons may prevent the deployment of pervasive sensor networks over civil structures, thus limiting their reliability in terms of damage detection. Moreover, the effects of environmental (and operational) variability may lead to false alarms. To address these challenges, a multi-stage machine learning (ML) method is here proposed by exploiting autoregressive (AR) spectra as damage-sensitive features. The proposed method is framed as follows: (i) computing the distances between different sets of the AR spectra via the log-spectral distance (LSD), providing also the training and test datasets; (ii) removing the potential environmental variability by an auto-associative artificial neural network (AANN), to set normalized training and test datasets; (iii) running a statistical analysis via the Mahalanobis-squared distance (MSD) for early damage detection. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is assessed in the case of limited vibration data for the laboratory truss structure known as the Wooden Bridge. Comparative studies show that the AR spectrum is a reliable feature, sensitive to damage even in the presence of a limited number of sensors in the network; additionally, the multi-stage ML methodology succeeds in early detecting damage under environmental variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Farrar, C.R., Worden, K.: Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Hoboken (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. He, L., Lian, J., Ma, B.: Intelligent damage identification method for large structures based on strain modal parameters. J. Vib. Control 20(12), 1783–1795 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yan, W.-J., Ren, W.-X.: Closed-form modal flexibility sensitivity and its application to structural damage detection without modal truncation error. J. Vib. Control 20(12), 1816–1830 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Quaranta, G., Carboni, B., Lacarbonara, W.: Damage detection by modal curvatures: numerical issues. J. Vib. Control 22(7), 1913–1927 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Entezami, A., Shariatmadar, H., Sarmadi, H.: Structural damage detection by a new iterative regularization method and an improved sensitivity function. J. Sound Vib. 399, 285–307 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eftekhar Azam, S., Mariani, S.: Online damage detection in structural systems via dynamic inverse analysis: a recursive Bayesian approach. Eng. Struct. 159, 28–45 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Entezami, A., Shariatmadar, H.: Damage localization in shear buildings by direct updating of physical properties. Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. (IJASE) 6(2), 1–12 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-014-0058-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Entezami, A., Shariatmadar, H., Ghalehnovi, M.: Damage detection by updating structural models based on linear objective functions. J. Civ. Struct. Heal. Monit. 4(3), 165–176 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-014-0072-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarmadi, H., Karamodin, A., Entezami, A.: A new iterative model updating technique based on least squares minimal residual method using measured modal data. Appl. Math. Model. 40(23–24), 10323–10341 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Shadan, F., Khoshnoudian, F., Inman, D.J., Esfandiari, A.: Experimental validation of a FRF-based model updating method. J. Vib. Control 24(8), 1570–1583 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rezaiee-Pajand, M., Entezami, A., Sarmadi, H.: A sensitivity-based finite element model updating based on unconstrained optimization problem and regularized solution methods. Struct. Control Health Monit. 27, e2481 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Entezami, A., Shariatmadar, H., Karamodin, A.: Data-driven damage diagnosis under environmental and operational variability by novel statistical pattern recognition methods. Struct. Health Monit. 18(5–6), 1416–1443 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Entezami, A., Shariatmadar, H., Mariani, S.: Fast unsupervised learning methods for structural health monitoring with large vibration data from dense sensor networks. Struct. Health Monit. 19(6), 1685–1710 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Entezami, A., Shariatmadar, H., De Michele, C.: Non-parametric empirical machine learning for short-term and long-term structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Entezami, A., Sarmadi, H., Salar, M., De Michele, C., Arslan, A. N.: A novel data-driven method for structural health monitoring under ambient vibration and high-dimensional features by robust multidimensional scaling. Struct. Health Monit. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deza, M., Deza, E.: Encyclopedia of Distances. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44342-2

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Feltrin, G., Jalsan, K.E., Flouri, K.: Vibration monitoring of a footbridge with a wireless sensor network. J. Vib. Control 19(15), 2285–2300 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Capellari, G., Chatzi, E., Mariani, S.: Cost-benefit optimization of sensor networks for SHM applications. In: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Capellari, G., Chatzi, E., Mariani, S.: Structural health monitoring sensor network optimization through bayesian experimental design. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civil Eng. 4(2), 04018016 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Entezami, A., Shariatmadar, H., Mariani, S.: Structural health monitoring for condition assessment using efficient supervised learning techniques. In: Proceedings, vol. 42, no. 1, p. 17 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Entezami, A., Shariatmadar, H., Mariani, S.: Early damage assessment in large-scale structures by innovative statistical pattern recognition methods based on time series modeling and novelty detection. Adv. Eng. Softw. 150, 102923 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Entezami, A., Sarmadi, H., Behkamal, B., Mariani, S.: Big data analytics and structural health monitoring: a statistical pattern recognition-based approach. Sensors 20(8), 2328 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Entezami, A., Sarmadi, H., Behkamal, B., Mariani, S.: Health monitoring of large-scale civil structures: an approach based on data partitioning and classical multidimensional scaling. Sensors 21(5), 1646 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ostachowicz, W., Soman, R., Malinowski, P.: Optimization of sensor placement for structural health monitoring: a review. Struct. Health Monit. 18(3), 963–988 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bagheri, A., Zare Hosseinzadeh, A., Rizzo, P., Ghodrati Amiri, G.: Time domain damage localization and quantification in seismically excited structures using a limited number of sensors. J. Vib. Control 23(18), 2942–2961 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Nie, Z., Lin, J., Li, J., Hao, H., Ma, H.: Bridge condition monitoring under moving loads using two sensor measurements. Struct. Health Monit. 19, 917–937 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Entezami, A., Mariani, S., Shariatmadar, H.: Damage detection in largely unobserved structures under varying environmental conditions: an autoregressive spectrum and multi-level machine learning methodology. Sensors 22(4), 1400 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Figueiredo, E., Park, G., Farrar, C.R., Worden, K., Figueiras, J.: Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability. Struct. Health Monit. 10(6), 559–572 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sarmadi, H., Karamodin, A.: A novel anomaly detection method based on adaptive Mahalanobis-squared distance and one-class kNN rule for structural health monitoring under environmental effects. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 140, 106495 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sarmadi, H., Entezami, A., Salar, M., De Michele, C.: Bridge health monitoring in environmental variability by new clustering and threshold estimation methods. J. Civ. Struct. Heal. Monit. 11(3), 629–644 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-021-00472-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Castanié, F.: Spectral Analysis: Parametric and Non-Parametric Digital Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Stoica, P., Moses, R.L.: Introduction to Spectral Analysis, vol. 1. Prentice hall, Upper Saddle River (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Entezami, A., Shariatmadar, H.: An unsupervised learning approach by novel damage indices in structural health monitoring for damage localization and quantification. Struct. Health Monit. 17(2), 325–345 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rabiner, L., Rabiner, L.R., Juang, B.H.: Fundamentals of Speech Recognition. PTR Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Kramer, M.A.: Autoassociative neural networks. Comput. Chem. Eng. 16(4), 313–328 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sarmadi, H., Karamodin, A.: A novel anomaly detection method based on adaptive Mahalanobis-squared distance and one-class kNN rule for structural health monitoring under environmental effects. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 140, 106495 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sarmadi, H., Entezami, A.: Application of supervised learning to validation of damage detection. Arch. Appl. Mech. 91(1), 393–410 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-020-01779-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kullaa, J.: Distinguishing between sensor fault, structural damage, and environmental or operational effects in structural health monitoring. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 25(8), 2976–2989 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Entezami .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Entezami, A., Mariani, S., Shariatmadar, H. (2023). A Multi-stage Machine Learning Methodology for Health Monitoring of Largely Unobserved Structures Under Varying Environmental Conditions. In: Rizzo, P., Milazzo, A. (eds) European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. EWSHM 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 254. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07258-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07258-1_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07257-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07258-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics