Skip to main content

Comparison Between Model Prediction and Measured Response of a Prestressed Concrete Bridge Tested to Failure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 253))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The number of bridges that are approaching or exceeding their initial design life has increased radically. Meanwhile, an ever-increasing volume of traffic each year, both in number and weight of vehicles, is creating an additional critical situation for this kind of structure. To predict the response of bridges to traffic loads and their ultimate capacity with low uncertainties, we can use numerical structural models; however, such uncertainties increase as bridges age due to deterioration mechanisms. Non-destructive tests of material specimens and full-scale on-site load tests of the structure allow to update model parameters and have a better estimate of the bridge behaviour. However, different load tests provide different information with different impacts on the updated model accuracy. With the aid of a real-life case study, the Alveo Vecchio highway bridge, which has been tested to failure with a sequence of progressively increasing load, we aim to understand what behaviour can predict a structural model and what we can learn from a load test. This study is part of a research agreement between the Italian Ministry of Sustainable Infrastructure and Mobility, Autostrade per l’Italia SpA (the main operator of Italian highways), and the University of Trento. It concerns the management and monitoring of civil infrastructure intending to develop survey protocols and monitor systems to assess the safety and performance of existing highway bridges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. BELL, Brian; RAIL, Network. European railway bridge demography. E FP, 2004, 6

    Google Scholar 

  2. Del Grosso, A., Inaudi, D., Pardi, L.: Overview of European activities in the health monitoring of bridges. In: First International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, Bercelona (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. European Committee for Standardization, «EN 1992-2 Eurocode 2 - Design of concrete structures - Concrete bridges - Design and detailing rules» CEN, Brussels (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni D.M. 17/01/2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bencivenga, P., et al.: Evolution of design traffic loads for Italian road bridges. In: Pellegrino, C., Faleschini, F., Zanini, M.A., Matos, J.C., Casas, J.R., Strauss, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Association on Quality Control of Bridges and Structures, vol. 200, pp. 1351–1358. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91877-4_154

  6. UK Department for Transport, Driving Standards Agency, The Official Highway Code 2007 Edition, The Stationery Office (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport. Codice della strada (2021). https://www.aci.it/i-servizi/normative/codice-della-strada.html

  8. Frangopol, D.M.: Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 3(1), 29–41 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Verzobio, A., Bolognani, D., Quigley, J., Zonta, D.: Quantifying the benefit of structural health monitoring: can the value of information be negative? Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 18, 573–594 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Caspani, V.F., Tonelli, D., Poli, F., Zonta, D.: Designing a structural health monitoring system accounting for temperature compensation. Infrastructures 7(1), 5 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Verzobio, A., Bolognani, D., Quigley, J., Zonta, D.: Consequences of representativeness bias on SHM-based decision-making. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 18, 851–863 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cotini, O., Di Maggio, R., Tonelli, D., Nascimben, R., Ataollahi, N.: Porosity of a fast-setting mortar with crystallization admixture and effect of a SA-PA modification. Materials 15(4), 1542 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tonelli, D., et al.: Effectiveness of acoustic emission monitoring for in-service prestressed concrete bridges. In: Proceedings of SPIE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quqa, S., Giordano, P.F., Limongelli, M.P., Landi, L., Diotallevi, P.P.: Clump interpolation error for the identification of damage on board decentralized sensing systems. Smart Struct. Syst. 27(2), 351–363 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lantsoght, E.O.L., van der Veen, C., de Boer, A., Hordijk, D.A.: State-of-the-art on load testing of concrete bridges. Eng. Struct. 150, 231–241 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abbiati, G., Covi, P., Tondini, N., Bursi, O.S., Stojadinović, B.: A real-time hybrid fire simulation method based on dynamic relaxation and partitioned time integration. J. Eng. Mech. 146(91) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. SPEA. Relazione di Calcolo Viadotto Alveo Vecchio alla progr. 39 + 364.21, Opera N*14 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  18. European Committee for Standardization,EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, CEN, Brussels (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research. OpenSees (2006). https://opensees.berkeley.edu/. Accessed 2021

  20. Italian National Unification,UNI/TR 11634:2016 Guidelines for structural health monitoring, UNI, Rome, (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the Italian Ministry of Sustainable Infrastructures and Mobility (MIMS) and Autostrade per l’Italia SpA (ASPI), MIUR PON RI 2014–2020 Program (project MITIGO, ARS01_00964), Consorzio ReLUIS (Project ReLUIS Ponti 2021–2022 ‘Implementation of provisions of DM 578/2020’) and Fondazione CARITRO Cassa di Risparmio di Trento e Rovereto (grant number 2021.0224).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Rossi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rossi, F., Brighenti, F., Verzobio, A., Tonelli, D., Zonta, D., Migliorino, P. (2023). Comparison Between Model Prediction and Measured Response of a Prestressed Concrete Bridge Tested to Failure. In: Rizzo, P., Milazzo, A. (eds) European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. EWSHM 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 253. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07254-3_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07254-3_55

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07253-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07254-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics