Abstract
The problem of global climate change is a complex problem for several reasons, not the least of which is its international character. As such, questions of justice between nations arise in consideration of the distribution of the burdens associated with addressing the climate crisis. This chapter outlines some of the most prominent frameworks of global justice in the context of global climate change, and sketches some of the challenges that these proposals face.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blake, M. (2001). Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30(3), 257–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00257.x
Broome, J. (2012). Climate matters: Ethics in a warming world. Norton.
Burbank, L. (2007, February 1). Bush views shift on climate change. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7115660
Cama, T., & Henry, D. (2017, June 1). Trump: We are getting out of the Paris climate deal. The Hill. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/335955-trump-pulls-us-out-of-paris-climate-deal
Caney, S. (2005). Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change. Leiden Journal of International Law, 18, 747–775. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156505002992
Caney, S. (2010). Climate change, human rights, and moral thresholds. In S. M. Gardiner, S. Caney, D. Jamieson, & H. Shue (Eds.), Climate ethics essential readings (pp. 163–177). Oxford University Press.
Caney, S. (2014). Two kind of climate justice: Avoiding harm and sharing burdens. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22(2), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12030
Colvin, J. & Pace, J. (2017, June 1). ‘I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris’: Trump pulling U.S. from global climate pact, dismaying allies. Post-Gazette. http://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-nation/2017/06/01/I-was-elected-to-represent-the-citizens-of-Pittsburgh-not-Paris-Trump-to-pull-U-S-out-of-Paris-climate-agreement/stories/201706010198
Fuhr, H. (2019). The Global South’s contribution to the climate crisis – and it potential solutions. OECD Development Matters. Retrieved from https://oecd-development-matters.org/2019/06/20/the-global-souths-contribution-to-the-climate-crisis-and-its-potential-solutions/
Gardiner, S. (2011). A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford University Press.
Gardiner, S., & Lawson, J. (2021). Falling on your own feasibility sword? Why climate policy based on “simple self-interest” fails to deliver. In S. Kenehan & C. Katz (Eds.), Climate justice and feasibility: Normative theorizing, feasibility constraints, and climate action (pp. 61–92). Rowman Littlefield International.
Gardiner, S., & Weisbach, D. (2016). Debating climate ethics. Oxford University Press.
Gilabert, P., & Lawford-Smith, H. (2012). Political feasibility: A conceptual exploration. Political Studies, 60(4), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/2Fj.1467-9248.2011.00936.x
Gilson, E., & Kenehan, S. (Eds.). (2019). Food, environment, and climate change: Justice at the intersections. Rowman Littlefield International.
Godfrey, P., & Torres, D. (Eds.). (2017). Systemic crises of global climate change. Routledge.
Gosseries, A. (2004). Historical emissions and free-riding. Ethical Perspectives, 11(1), 36–60. https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.11.1.504779
Heyd, D. (2017). Climate ethics, affirmative action, and unjust enrichment. In L. H. Meyer & P. Sanklecha (Eds.), Climate justice and historical emissions (pp. 22–45). Cambridge University Press.
Heyward, C., & Roser, D. (Eds.). (2016). Climate justice in a non-ideal world. Oxford University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2018). Global Warming of 1.5 °C. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
Jamieson, D. (2010). Climate change, responsibility, and justice. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16, 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9174-x
Jamieson, D. W., & Di Paola, M. (2014). Climate change and global justice: New problem, old paradigm? Global Policy, 5(1), 105–111. Kenehan, S. (2015). In defense of the duty to assist: A response to critics on the viability of a Rawlsian approach to climate change. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 18(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2013.839428
Kenehan, S. (2017). In the name of political possibility: A new proposal for thinking about the role and relevance of historical greenhouse gas emissions. In L. H. Meyer & P. Sanklecha (Eds.), Climate justice and historical emissions (pp. 198–218). Cambridge University Press.
Kenehan, S. & Katz, C. (Eds.). (2021a). Climate justice and feasibility: Normative theorizing, feasibility constraints, and climate action. Rowman Littlefield International.
Kenehan, S. & Katz, C. (Eds.). (2021b)). Principles of justice and real-world climate politics. Rowman Littlefield International.
Lawford-Smith, H. (2013). Understanding political feasibility. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 21(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2012.00422.x
Meyer, L., & Roser, D. (2009). Enough for the future. In L. H. Meyer & A. Gosseries (Eds.), Intergenerational justice (pp. 219–248). Oxford University Press.
Meyer, L., & Roser, D. (2010). Climate justice and historical emissions. Critical Review of International Social and Political, 13(1), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326349
Meyer, L., & Sanklecha, P. (Eds.). (2017). Climate justice and historical emissions. Cambridge University Press.
Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford University Press.
Neumayer, E. (2000). In defense of historical accountability for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecological Economics, 33(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00135-X
Noll, S. (2018). Nonhuman climate refugees: The role that urban communities should play in ensuring ecological resilience. Environmental Ethics: An Interdisciplinary Journal Dedicated to the Philosophical Aspects of Environmental Problems, 40(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201840213
Page, E. (2012). Give it up for climate change: A defence of the beneficiary pays principle. International Theory, 4(2), 300–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191200005X
Palmer, C. (2018). Conservation strategies in a changing climate – Moving beyond an ‘animal liberation/environmental ethics’ divide. Les ateliers de l’éthique, 13(1), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.7202/1055116ar
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press.
Posner, E., & Weisbach, D. (2010). Climate change justice. Princeton University Press.
Schuppert, F. (2016). Carbon sink conservation and global justice: Benefitting, free riding and non-compliance. Res Publica: A Journal of Legal and Social Philosophy, 22(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-015-9314-x
Sengupta, S., Eddy, M., Buckley, C., & Rubin, A. (2017, June 1). As Trump Exits Paris Agreement, Other Nations Are Defiant. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/world/europe/climate-paris-agreement-trump-china.html
Shue, H. (1999). Global environment and international inequality. International Affairs, 75(3), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00092
Shue, H. (2010a). Deadly delays, saving opportunities: Creating a more dangerous world? In S. M. Gardiner, S. Caney, D. Jamieson, & H. Shue (Eds.), Climate ethics essential readings (pp. 146–162). Oxford University Press.
Shue, H. (2010b). Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. In S. M. Gardiner, S. Caney, D. Jamieson, & H. Shue (Eds.), Climate ethics essential readings (pp. 200–214). Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. (2002). One world: The ethics of globalization. Yale University Press.
Stern, T. (2020, September 14). Can the United States and China Reboot their climate cooperation? Brookings. Retrieved from: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/can-the-united-states-and-china-reboot-their-climate-cooperation/
U.S. Department of State. (2021, November 10). U.S.-China joint glasgow declaration on enhancing climate action in the 2020s. Retrieved from: https://www.state.gov/u-s-china-joint-glasgow-declaration-on-enhancing-climate-action-in-the-2020s/
Union of Concerned Scientists. (2020). Each country’s share of CO2 emissions. Retrieved from: https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/each-countrys-share-co2-emissions
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [UNFCCC], ad hoc Group on the Berlin Mandate. (1997) Implementation of the Berlin mandate: Additional proposals from parties. . https://unfccc.int/documents/926
Weisbach, D. (2021). Feasibility and climate justice. In S. Kenehan & C. Katz (Eds.), Climate justice and feasibility: Normative theorizing, feasibility constraints, and climate action (pp. 15–32). Rowman Littlefield International.
WH.GOV. (2021, August 11). ICYMI: Biden-Harris administration leaders underscore importance of global action to combat climate change on heels of new IPCC Report. Retrieved from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2021/08/11/icymi-biden-harris-administration-leaders-underscore-importance-of-global-action-to-combat-climate-change-on-heels-of-new-ipcc-report/
Working Group I to the First Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1990). FAR climate change: Scientific assessment. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar1/wg1/
Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_full.pdf
Working Group II to the First Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1990). FAR climate change: Impacts assessment of climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar1/wg2/
Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/social-economic-and-ethical-concepts-and-methods/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kenehan, S. (2023). Climate Change and Global Justice. In: Pellegrino, G., Di Paola, M. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07002-0_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07002-0_51
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07001-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07002-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities