Skip to main content

Using the FITradeoff Method for Solving a Truck Acquisition Problem at a Midsize Carrier

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Support Systems XII: Decision Support Addressing Modern Industry, Business, and Societal Needs (ICDSST 2022)

Abstract

The study demonstrates the flexible functioning of the FITradeoff method that integrates the Holistic Evaluation with the Elicitation by Decomposition. For that purpose, the new features of the FITradeoff method in which integrates the two paradigms of preference modeling have been explored to solve a real multi-criteria decision problem. In this paper, a truck acquisition problem, at a midsize carrier faced with an uncertain and turbulent scenario due to the Coronavirus pandemic, was solved using the FITradeoff method. In this problem, seven criteria were considered to represent the Decision-Maker objectives. Also, six trucks (alternatives) have been examined by the Decision-Maker (Financial Director). The FITradeoff DSS supported the company as to obtain, through the combination of Holistic Evaluation and Elicitation by Decomposition, a ranking of all the trucks based on the preferences expressed during the decision process to ensure lower costs and higher profits in the long run, also guaranteeing a quicker (more efficient) resolution of the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences, and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Belton, V., Stewart, T.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds).: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, Berlin (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/b100605

  4. de Almeida, A.T., Cavalcante, C., Alencar, M., Ferreira, R., de Almeida-Filho A.T., Garcez. T.: Multicriteria and Multi-objective Models for Risk, Reliability and Maintenance Decision Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. vol. 231. Springer, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17969-8

  5. Barla, S.B.: A case study of supplier selection for lean supply by using a mathematical model. Logist. Inf. Manag. 16, 451–459 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xia, W., Zhiming, W.: Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments. Omega 35(5), 494–504 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chai, J., Liu, J., Ngai, E.: Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(10), 3872–3885 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P., Araújo, J., de Almeida, A., de Almeida, T.: A multicriteria decision model for supplier selection in a food industry based on FITradeoff method. Math. Prob. Eng. 2017, 1–9 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K.: Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202(1), 16–24 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Almeida, A.T., Almeida, J.A., Costa, A.P.C.S., Almeida-Filho, A.T.: A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(1), 179–191 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. de Almeida, A.T., Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P.: Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff. CEJOR 29(1), 7–47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00728-z

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Weber, M., Borcherding, K.: Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multi-attribute decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 67, 1–12 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Gusmao, A.P.H., Pereira Medeiros, C.: A model for selecting a strategic information system using the FITradeoff. Math. Prob. Eng. 2016, 1–8 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kang, T.H.A., Júnior, A.M.D.C.S., de Almeida, A.T.: Evaluating electric power generation technologies: a multicriteria analysis based on the FITradeoff method. Energy 165, 10–20 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carrillo, P.A.A., Roselli, L.R.P., Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T.: Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method. Ann. Oper. Res. 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3020-y

  16. de Macedo, P.P., de Miranda Mota, C.M., Sola, A.V.H.: Meeting the Brazilian energy efficiency law: a flexible and interactive multicriteria proposal to replace non-efficient motors. Sustain. Cities Soc. 41, 822–832 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T., Costa, A.P.C.S.: Using data visualization for ranking alternatives with partial information and interactive tradeoff elicitation. Oper. Res. Int. J. 19(4), 909–931 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-00444-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Monte, M.B.S., Morais, D.C.: A decision model for identifying and solving problems in an urban water supply system. Water Resour. Manage. 33(14), 4835–4848 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kang, T.H.A., Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T.: Flexible and interactive tradeoff elicitation for multicriteria sorting problems. Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res. 37, 2050020 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Fossile, D.K., Frej, E.A., da Costa, S.E.G., de Lima, E.P., de Almeida, A.T.: Selecting the most viable renewable energy source for Brazilian ports using the FITradeoff method. J. Clean. Prod. 260, 121107 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Santos, I.M., Roselli, L.R.P., da Silva, A.L.G., Alencar, L.H.: A supplier selection model for a wholesaler and retailer company based on FITradeoff multicriteria method. Math. Prob. Eng. 2020, 1–14 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dell’Ovo, M., Oppio, A., Capolongo, S.: Decision support system for the location of healthcare facilities SitHealth evaluation tool. PoliMI SpringerBriefs. Springer Nature, Switzerland (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50173-0

  23. Camilo, D.G.G., de Souza, R.P., Frazão, T.D.C., da Costa Junior, J.F.: Multi-criteria analysis in the health area: selection of the most appropriate triage system for the emergency care units in natal. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 20(1), 1–16 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pergher, I., Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T.: Integrating simulation and FITradeoff method for scheduling rules selection in job-shop production systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 227, 107669 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Frej, E.A., Ekel, P., de Almeida, A.T.: A Benefit-to-cost ratio based approach for portfolio selection under multiple criteria with incomplete preference information. Inf. Sci. 545, 487–498 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T.: Use of the alpha-theta diagram as a decision neuroscience tool for analyzing holistic evaluation in decision making. Ann. Oper. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04495-1

  27. Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T.: The use of the success‐based decision rule to support the holistic evaluation process in FITradeoff. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2021, 1–21 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Silva A.L.C.L, Costa, A.P.C.S., de Almeida, A.T.: Exploring cognitive aspects of FITradeoff method using neuroscience tools. Ann. Oper. Res. 1–23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03894-0

  29. Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T., Frej, E.A.: Decision neuroscience for improving data visualization of decision support in the FITradeoff method. Oper. Res. Int. J. 19(4), 933–953 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-00445-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roselli, L.R.P., Pereira, L., da Silva, A., de Almeida, A.T., Morais, D.C., Costa, A.P.C.S.: Neuroscience experiment applied to investigate decision-maker behavior in the tradeoff elicitation procedure. Ann. Oper. Res. 289(1), 67–84 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03394-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Carneiro de Lima da Silva, A.L., Cabral Seixas Costa, A.P.: FITradeoff Decision Support System: An Exploratory Study with Neuroscience Tools. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A., Fischer, T. (eds.) Information Systems and Neuroscience. LNISO, vol. 32, pp. 365–372. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28144-1_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work had partial support from the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) [grant 308531/2015–9;312695/2020–9] and the Foundation of Support in Science and Technology of the State of Pernambuco (FACEPE) [APQ-0484–3.08/17].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cyreno, M.W., Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T. (2022). Using the FITradeoff Method for Solving a Truck Acquisition Problem at a Midsize Carrier. In: Cabral Seixas Costa, A.P., Papathanasiou, J., Jayawickrama, U., Kamissoko, D. (eds) Decision Support Systems XII: Decision Support Addressing Modern Industry, Business, and Societal Needs. ICDSST 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 447. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06530-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06530-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06529-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06530-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics