Abstract
The study demonstrates the flexible functioning of the FITradeoff method that integrates the Holistic Evaluation with the Elicitation by Decomposition. For that purpose, the new features of the FITradeoff method in which integrates the two paradigms of preference modeling have been explored to solve a real multi-criteria decision problem. In this paper, a truck acquisition problem, at a midsize carrier faced with an uncertain and turbulent scenario due to the Coronavirus pandemic, was solved using the FITradeoff method. In this problem, seven criteria were considered to represent the Decision-Maker objectives. Also, six trucks (alternatives) have been examined by the Decision-Maker (Financial Director). The FITradeoff DSS supported the company as to obtain, through the combination of Holistic Evaluation and Elicitation by Decomposition, a ranking of all the trucks based on the preferences expressed during the decision process to ensure lower costs and higher profits in the long run, also guaranteeing a quicker (more efficient) resolution of the problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences, and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976)
Belton, V., Stewart, T.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds).: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, Berlin (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/b100605
de Almeida, A.T., Cavalcante, C., Alencar, M., Ferreira, R., de Almeida-Filho A.T., Garcez. T.: Multicriteria and Multi-objective Models for Risk, Reliability and Maintenance Decision Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. vol. 231. Springer, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17969-8
Barla, S.B.: A case study of supplier selection for lean supply by using a mathematical model. Logist. Inf. Manag. 16, 451–459 (2003)
Xia, W., Zhiming, W.: Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments. Omega 35(5), 494–504 (2007)
Chai, J., Liu, J., Ngai, E.: Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(10), 3872–3885 (2013)
Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P., Araújo, J., de Almeida, A., de Almeida, T.: A multicriteria decision model for supplier selection in a food industry based on FITradeoff method. Math. Prob. Eng. 2017, 1–9 (2017)
Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K.: Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202(1), 16–24 (2010)
de Almeida, A.T., Almeida, J.A., Costa, A.P.C.S., Almeida-Filho, A.T.: A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(1), 179–191 (2016)
de Almeida, A.T., Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P.: Combining holistic and decomposition paradigms in preference modeling with the flexibility of FITradeoff. CEJOR 29(1), 7–47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00728-z
Weber, M., Borcherding, K.: Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multi-attribute decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 67, 1–12 (1993)
de Gusmao, A.P.H., Pereira Medeiros, C.: A model for selecting a strategic information system using the FITradeoff. Math. Prob. Eng. 2016, 1–8 (2016)
Kang, T.H.A., Júnior, A.M.D.C.S., de Almeida, A.T.: Evaluating electric power generation technologies: a multicriteria analysis based on the FITradeoff method. Energy 165, 10–20 (2018)
Carrillo, P.A.A., Roselli, L.R.P., Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T.: Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method. Ann. Oper. Res. 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3020-y
de Macedo, P.P., de Miranda Mota, C.M., Sola, A.V.H.: Meeting the Brazilian energy efficiency law: a flexible and interactive multicriteria proposal to replace non-efficient motors. Sustain. Cities Soc. 41, 822–832 (2018)
Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T., Costa, A.P.C.S.: Using data visualization for ranking alternatives with partial information and interactive tradeoff elicitation. Oper. Res. Int. J. 19(4), 909–931 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-00444-2
Monte, M.B.S., Morais, D.C.: A decision model for identifying and solving problems in an urban water supply system. Water Resour. Manage. 33(14), 4835–4848 (2019)
Kang, T.H.A., Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T.: Flexible and interactive tradeoff elicitation for multicriteria sorting problems. Asia Pac. J. Oper. Res. 37, 2050020 (2020)
Fossile, D.K., Frej, E.A., da Costa, S.E.G., de Lima, E.P., de Almeida, A.T.: Selecting the most viable renewable energy source for Brazilian ports using the FITradeoff method. J. Clean. Prod. 260, 121107 (2020)
Santos, I.M., Roselli, L.R.P., da Silva, A.L.G., Alencar, L.H.: A supplier selection model for a wholesaler and retailer company based on FITradeoff multicriteria method. Math. Prob. Eng. 2020, 1–14 (2020)
Dell’Ovo, M., Oppio, A., Capolongo, S.: Decision support system for the location of healthcare facilities SitHealth evaluation tool. PoliMI SpringerBriefs. Springer Nature, Switzerland (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50173-0
Camilo, D.G.G., de Souza, R.P., Frazão, T.D.C., da Costa Junior, J.F.: Multi-criteria analysis in the health area: selection of the most appropriate triage system for the emergency care units in natal. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 20(1), 1–16 (2020)
Pergher, I., Frej, E.A., Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T.: Integrating simulation and FITradeoff method for scheduling rules selection in job-shop production systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 227, 107669 (2020)
Frej, E.A., Ekel, P., de Almeida, A.T.: A Benefit-to-cost ratio based approach for portfolio selection under multiple criteria with incomplete preference information. Inf. Sci. 545, 487–498 (2021)
Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T.: Use of the alpha-theta diagram as a decision neuroscience tool for analyzing holistic evaluation in decision making. Ann. Oper. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04495-1
Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T.: The use of the success‐based decision rule to support the holistic evaluation process in FITradeoff. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2021, 1–21 (2021)
Silva A.L.C.L, Costa, A.P.C.S., de Almeida, A.T.: Exploring cognitive aspects of FITradeoff method using neuroscience tools. Ann. Oper. Res. 1–23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03894-0
Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T., Frej, E.A.: Decision neuroscience for improving data visualization of decision support in the FITradeoff method. Oper. Res. Int. J. 19(4), 933–953 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-00445-1
Roselli, L.R.P., Pereira, L., da Silva, A., de Almeida, A.T., Morais, D.C., Costa, A.P.C.S.: Neuroscience experiment applied to investigate decision-maker behavior in the tradeoff elicitation procedure. Ann. Oper. Res. 289(1), 67–84 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03394-w
Carneiro de Lima da Silva, A.L., Cabral Seixas Costa, A.P.: FITradeoff Decision Support System: An Exploratory Study with Neuroscience Tools. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A., Fischer, T. (eds.) Information Systems and Neuroscience. LNISO, vol. 32, pp. 365–372. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28144-1_40
Acknowledgment
This work had partial support from the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) [grant 308531/2015–9;312695/2020–9] and the Foundation of Support in Science and Technology of the State of Pernambuco (FACEPE) [APQ-0484–3.08/17].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cyreno, M.W., Roselli, L.R.P., de Almeida, A.T. (2022). Using the FITradeoff Method for Solving a Truck Acquisition Problem at a Midsize Carrier. In: Cabral Seixas Costa, A.P., Papathanasiou, J., Jayawickrama, U., Kamissoko, D. (eds) Decision Support Systems XII: Decision Support Addressing Modern Industry, Business, and Societal Needs. ICDSST 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 447. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06530-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06530-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06529-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06530-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)