Skip to main content

Absent End-Diastolic Velocity in the Umbilical Artery and Its Clinical Significance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Clinical evidence shows that the end-diagnostic component of an umbilical artery (UA) Doppler waveform is of crucial importance to prognostication in fetal growth restriction (FGR). Absent and reverse end-diastolic velocity (AREDV) in the UA is associated with high perinatal deaths and morbidities such as fetal asphyxia, malformations, and chromosomal abnormalities. This chapter offers an updated review of this important topic. Most infants with AREDV require intensive care. Furthermore, the risks of cerebral hemorrhage, anemia, and hypoglycemia are increased. Absent end-diastolic flow may improve, although often only transiently, and weeks or more may elapse before the fetus shows additional evidence of compromise. With progressive fetal compromise in early-onset FGR, most cases show deterioration of fetal Doppler sequentially from the UA, the middle cerebral artery (MCA), and then to the ductus venosus. However, many investigators dispute the existence of such a dominant sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rochelson B, Schulman H, Framakides G, et al. The significance of absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery velocity waveforms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:1213–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Woo JS, Liang ST, Lo RL. Significance of an absent or reversed end diastolic flow in Doppler umbilical artery waveforms. J Ultrasound Med. 1987;6:291–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reuwer PJ, Sijmons EA, Rietman GW, van Tiel MW, Bruines HW. Intrauterine growth retardation: prediction of perinatal distress by Doppler ultrasound. Lancet. 1987;2:415–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hackett GA, Campbell S, Gamsu H, Cohen-Overbeek T, Pearce JM. Doppler studies in the growth retarded fetus and prediction of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis, haemorrhage, and neonatal morbidity. BMJ. 1987;294:13–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arabin B, Siebert M, Jimenez E, Saling E. Obstetrical characteristics of a loss of end-diastolic velocities in the fetal aorta and/or umbilical artery using Doppler ultrasound. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1988;25:173–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsieh FJ, Chang FM, Ko TM, Chen HY, Chen YP. Umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms in fetuses dying with congenital anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;95:478–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Johstone FD, Haddad NG, Hoskins P, et al. Umbilical artery Doppler flow velocity waveform: the outcome of pregnancies with absent end diastolic flow. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1988;28:171–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brar HS, Platt LD. Reverse end-diastolic flow velocity on umbilical artery velocimetry in high-risk pregnancies: an ominous finding with adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159:559–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tyrrell S, Obaid AH, Lilford RJ. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry as a predictor of fetal hypoxia and acidosis at birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:332–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brar HS, Platt LD. Antepartum improvement of abnormal umbilical artery velocimetry: does it occur? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:36–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Divon MY, Girz BA, Lieblich R, Langer O. Clinical management of the fetus with markedly diminished umbilical artery end-diastolic flow. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:1523–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McParland P, Steel S, Pearce JM. The clinical implications of absent or reversed end-diastolic frequencies in umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1990;37:15–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bekedam DJ, Visser GH, van der Zee AG, Snijders RJ, Poelmann-Weesjes G. Abnormal velocity waveforms of the umbilical artery in growth retarded fetuses: relationship to antepartum late heart rate decelerations and outcome. Early Hum Dev. 1990;24:79–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huneke B, Carstensen MH, Schroder HJ, Gunther M. Perinatal outcome in fetuses with loss of end-diastolic blood flow velocities in the descending aorta and/or umbilical arteries. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991;32:167–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Malcolm G, Ellwood D, Devonald K, Beilby R, Hender-son-Smart D. Absent or reversed end diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical artery and necrotising enterocolitis. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:805–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sengupta S, Harrigan JT, Rosenberg JC, Davis SE, Knuppel RA. Perinatal outcome following improvement of abnormal umbilical artery velocimetry. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:1062–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wenstrom KD, Weiner CP, Williamson RA. Diverse maternal and fetal pathology associated with absent diastolic flow in the umbilical artery of high-risk fetuses. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:374–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt W, Ruhle W, Ertan AK, Boos R, Gnirs J. Doppler ultrasonography—perinatal data in cases with end-diastolic block and reverse flow. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk. 1991;51:288–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weiss E, Ulrich S, Berle P. Condition at birth of infants with previously absent or reverse umbilical artery end-diastolic flow velocities. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1992;252:37–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bell JG, Ludomirsky A, Bottalico J, Weiner S. The effect of improvement of umbilical artery absent end-diastolic velocity on perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:1015–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pattinson RC, Hope P, Imhoff R, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcome in fetuses with absent end-diastolic velocities of the umbilical artery: a case-con-trolled study. Am J Perinatol. 1993;10:135–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pattinson RC, Odendaal HJ, Kirsten G. The relationship between absent end-diastolic velocities of the umbilical artery and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Early Hum Dev. 1993;33:61–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Battaglia C, Artini PG, Galli PA, et al. Absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in umbilical artery and severe intrauterine growth retardation: an ominous association. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72:167–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Karsdorp VH, van Vugt JM, van Geijn HP, et al. Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet. 1994;344:1664–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rizzo G, Pietropolli A, Capponi A, Arduini D, Romanini CC. Chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: analysis of risk factors for an abnormal karyotype. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:827–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Poulain P, Palaric JC, Milon J, et al. Absent end diastolic flow of umbilical artery Doppler: pregnancy outcome in 62 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994;53:115–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Beattie RB, Dornan JC. Antenatal screening for intrauterine growth retardation with umbilical artery Doppler ultrasonography. BMJ. 1989;298:631–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nkosi S, Makin J, Hlongwane T, Pattinson RC. Screening and managing a low-risk pregnant population using continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound in a low-income population: a cohort analytical study. SAMJ. 2019;109:347–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Caradeux J, Martinez-Portilla RJ, Basuki TR, et al. Risk of fetal death in growth-restricted fetuses with umbilical and/or ductus venosus absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities before 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S774–S782.e21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Martinez JM, Antolin E, Borrell A, Puerto B, Casals E, Ojuel J, Fortuny A. Umbilical Doppler velocimetry in fetuses with trisomy 18 at 10–18 weeks’ gestation. Prenat Diagn. 1997;17:319–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Borrell A, Martinez JM, Farre MT, Azulay M, Cararach V, Fortuny A. Reversed end-diastolic flow in first-trimester umbilical artery: an ominous new sign for fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:204–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Snijders RJ, Sherrod C, Gosden CM, Nicolaides KH. Fetal growth retardation: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:547–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rochelson B, Kaplan C, Guzman E, et al. A quantitative analysis of placental vasculature in the third-trimester fetus with autosomal trisomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:59–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nicolaides KH, Bilardo CM, Soothill PW, Campbell S. Absence of end-diastolic frequencies in umbilical artery: a sign of fetal hypoxia and acidosis. BMJ. 1988;297:1026–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ashmead GG, Lazebnik N, Ashmead JW, Stepanchak W, Mann LI. Normal blood gases in fetuses with absence of end-diastolic umbilical artery velocity. Am J Perinatol. 1993;10:67–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Warren W, Ronkin S, Chayen B, Needleman L, Wapne RJ. Absence of end-diastolic umbilical artery blood flow predicts poor fetal outcome despite normal blood gases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Adiotomre PN, Johnstone FD, Laing IA. Effect of absent end diastolic flow velocity in the fetal umbilical artery on subsequent outcome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997;76:35–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Spinillo A, Montanari L, Bergante C, Gaia G, Chiara A, Fazzi E. Prognostic value of umbilical artery Doppler studies in unselected preterm deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:613–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Ghazali W, Chita SK, Chapman MG, Allan LD. Evidence of redistribution of cardiac output in asymmetrical growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96:697–704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilcox GR, Trudinger BJ. Fetal platelet consumption: a feature of placental insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:616–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Steiner H, Staudach A, Spitzer D, Schaffer KH, Gregg A, Weiner CP. Growth deficient fetuses with absent or reversed umbilical artery end-diastolic flow are metabolically compromised. Early Hum Dev. 1995;41:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Phelan JP, Korst LM, Ahn MO, Martin GI. Neonatal nucleated red blood cell and lymphocyte counts in fetal brain injury. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:485–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Viscardi RM, Sun CC. Placental lesion multiplicity: risk factor for IUGR and neonatal cranial ultrasound abnormalities. Early Hum Dev. 2001;62:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. McDonnell M, Serra-Serra V, Gaffney G, Redman CW, Hope PL. Neonatal outcome after pregnancy complicated by abnormal velocity waveforms in the umbilical artery. Arch Dis Child. 1994;70:F84–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kirsten GF, van Zyl N, Smith M, Odendaal H. Necrotizing enterocolitis in infants born to women with severe early preeclampsia and absent end-diastolic umbilical artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms. Am J Perinatol. 1999;16:309–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Gonzalez JM, Stamilio DM, Ural S, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Relationship between abnormal fetal testing and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(5):e48–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Manogura AC, Turan O, Kush ML, et al. Predictors of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm growth-restricted neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:638.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Reiss I, Gornter L, Weiner CP, Harman CR. Absent umbilical artery end-diastolic velocity in growth-restricted fetuses: a risk factor for neonatal thrombocytopenia. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:162–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Axt-Fliedner R, Hendrik HJ, Schmidt W. Nucleated red blood cell counts in growth-restricted neonates with absent or reversed-end-diastolic umbilical artery velocity. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2002;29:242–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Alawani SS, Prakash R, Kumar GM, Rudrappa S, Krishnamurthy B. Predictive ability of venous blood nucleated red blood cells counts in term infants with perinatal asphyxia: a diagnostic study. J Clin Neonatol. 2018;7:250–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mirunalini S. Nucleated RBCs in cord blood as a predictor of fetal asphyxia. IAIM. 2018;5(9):48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Boskabadi H, Maamouri G, Sadeghian MH, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Heidarzade M, Shakeri MT, Ferns G. Early diagnosis of perinatal asphyxia by nucleated red blood cell count: a case-control study. Arch Iran Med. 2010;13(4):275–81. https://doi.org/010134/AIM.005.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hanretty KP, Whittle MJ, Rubin PC. Reappearance of end-diastolic velocity in a pregnancy complicated by severe pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:1123–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kush ML, Jenkins CB, Baschat AA. Variable umbilical artery end-diastolic velocity: a possible sign of velamentous cord insertion in monochorionic gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:95–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Teyssier G, Fouron JC, Maroto D, Sonesson SE, Bonnin P. Blood flow velocity in the fetal aortic isthmus: a sensitive indicator of changes in systemic peripheral resistance. I. Experimental studies. J Matern Fetal Invest. 1993;3:213–8.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fouron JC, Teyssier G, Bonnin P, et al. Blood flow velocity in the fetal aortic isthmus: a sensitive indicator of changes in systemic peripheral resistances. II. Preliminary observations. J Matern Fetal Invest. 1993;3:219–24.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Arduini D, Rizzo G, Romanini C. The development of abnormal heart rate patterns after absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: analysis of risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:43–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Schulman H, Penny B. Central and peripheral hemodynamic changes in fetuses with absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery; correlation with computerized fetal heart rate pattern. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:509–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. James DK, Parker MJ, Smoleniec JS. Comprehensive fetal assessment with three ultrasonographic characteristics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1486–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Hecher K, Bilardo CM, Stigter RH, et al. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:564–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Harman CR. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:571–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Ferrazzi E, Bozzo M, Rigano S, Bellotti M, Morabito A, Pardi G, Battaglia FC, Galan HL. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:140–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. Predictable progressive Doppler deterioration in IUGR: does it really exist? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:539.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Fornés-Ferrer V, Alberola-Rubio J, Hervas-Marín D, Peralta Llorens N, Perales-Marín A. Progression of Doppler changes in early-onset small for gestational age fetuses. How frequent are the different progression sequences? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;18(31):1000–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 204. Fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e97–e109.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ott WJ, Mora G, Arias F, Sunderji S, Sheldon G. Comparison of the modified biophysical profile to a “new” biophysical profile incorporating the middle cerebral artery to umbilical artery velocity flow systolic/diastolic ratio. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:1346–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Karsdorp VH, van Vugt JM, Dekker GA, van Geijn HP. Reappearance of end-diastolic velocities in the umbilical artery following maternal volume expansion: a preliminary study. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:679–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Small-for-gestational-age fetus, investigation and management (green-top guideline no. 31); 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dev Maulik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maulik, D., Schrufer-Poland, T. (2023). Absent End-Diastolic Velocity in the Umbilical Artery and Its Clinical Significance. In: Maulik, D., Lees, C.C. (eds) Doppler Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06189-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06189-9_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06188-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06189-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics