Skip to main content

Bribery in Rating Systems: A Game-Theoretic Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13282))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Rating systems play a vital role in the exponential growth of service-oriented markets. As highly rated online services usually receive substantial revenue in the markets, malicious sellers seek to boost their service evaluation by manipulating the rating system with fake ratings. One effective way to improve the service evaluation is to hire fake rating providers by bribery. The fake ratings given by the bribed buyers influence the evaluation of the service, which further impacts the decision-making of potential buyers. In this paper, we study the bribery of a rating system with multiple sellers and buyers via a game-theoretic perspective. In detail, we examine whether there exists an equilibrium state in the market in which the rating system is expected to be bribery-proof: no bribery strategy yields a strictly positive gain. We first collect real-world data for modeling the bribery problem in rating systems. On top of that, we analyze the problem of bribery in a rating system as a static game. From our analysis, we conclude that at least a Nash equilibrium can be reached in the bribery game of rating systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cao, X., Huang, W., Yu, Y.: A complete and comprehensive movie review dataset (ccmr). In: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 661–664. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Faliszewski, P., Hemaspaandra, E., Hemaspaandra, L.A.: How hard is bribery in elections? J. Artif. Intell. Res. 35, 485–532 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Faliszewski, P., Hemaspaandra, E., Hemaspaandra, L.A., Rothe, J.: Llull and copeland voting computationally resist bribery and constructive control. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 35, 275–341 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gibbons, R.: Game Theory for Applied Economists. Princeton University Press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grandi, U., Stewart, J., Turrini, P.: Personalised rating. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 34(2), 1–38 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-020-09479-2

  6. Grandi, U., Turrini, P.: A network-based rating system and its resistance to bribery. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 301–307. AAAI Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Helpman, E., Persson, T.: Lobbying and legislative bargaining. Adv. Econ. Anal. Policy 1(1) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang, S., Zhang, J., Ong, Y.S.: An evolutionary model for constructing robust trust networks. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, pp. 813–820. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., Boyd, C.: A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis. Supp. Syst. 43(2), 618–644, 107441 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lianju, S., Luyan, P.: Game theory analysis of the bribery behavior. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2(8) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, C., et al.: Fraud transactions detection via behavior tree with local intention calibration. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 3035–3043 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, Y., Zhou, X., Yu, H.: 3r model: a post-purchase context-aware reputation model to mitigate unfair ratings in e-commerce. Knowl.-Based Syst. 231, 107441 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manzoor, S., Luna, J., Suri, N.: Attackdive: diving deep into the cloud ecosystem to explore attack surfaces. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 499–502. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nash, J.F.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 36(1), 48, 107441 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ouffoué, G.L., Zaïdi, F., Cavalli, A.R., Lallali, M.: An attack-tolerant framework for web services. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 503–506. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parkes, D.C., Tylkin, P., Xia, L.: Thwarting vote buying through decoy ballots. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 1679–1681 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramos, G., Boratto, L., Caleiro, C.: On the negative impact of social influence in recommender systems: a study of bribery in collaborative hybrid algorithms. Inf. Process. Manage. 57(2), 102058 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., Lockwood, K.: The value of reputation on ebay: a controlled experiment. Exp. Econ. 9(2), 79–101, 102058 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sampath, V.S., Gardberg, N.A., Rahman, N.: Corporate reputation’s invisible hand: bribery, rational choice, and market penalties. J. Bus. Ethics 151(3), 743–760, 102058 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saúde, J., Ramos, G., Boratto, L., Caleiro, C.: A robust reputation-based group ranking system and its resistance to bribery. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 16(2), 1–35, 102058 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, D., Muller, T., Zhang, J., Liu, Y.: Quantifying robustness of trust systems against collusive unfair rating attacks using information theory. In: IJCAI, pp. 111–117 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, D., Muller, T., Zhang, J., Liu, Y.: Is it harmful when advisors only pretend to be honest? In: AAAI, pp. 2551–2557 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, G., et al.: Serf and turf: crowdturfing for fun and profit. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 679–688. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, C., Zhang, J., Sun, Z.: Online reputation fraud campaign detection in user ratings. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (IJCAI), pp. 3873–3879 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ye, Q., Law, R., Gu, B.: The impact of online user reviews on hotel room sales. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 28(1), 180–182 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou, X., Lin, D., Ishida, T.: Evaluating reputation of web services under rating scarcity. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 211–218. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou, X., Murakami, Y., Ishida, T., Liu, X., Huang, G.: Arm: toward adaptive and robust model for reputation aggregation. IEEE Transac. Autom. Sci. Eng. 17(1) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu, H., Xiong, H., Ge, Y., Chen, E.: Discovery of ranking fraud for mobile apps. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 27(1), 74–87 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61906174 and 62172085, in part by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant No. 2020M672275, and in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP19H04170. We would like to thank Gautham Prakash for his sharing of Google Play apps dataset.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuan Liu or Qidong Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhou, X., Matsubara, S., Liu, Y., Liu, Q. (2022). Bribery in Rating Systems: A Game-Theoretic Perspective. In: Gama, J., Li, T., Yu, Y., Chen, E., Zheng, Y., Teng, F. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13282. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05981-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05981-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05980-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05981-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics