Abstract
For 1934, film popularity (POPSTAT) statistics of three small English cities, Bolton, Brighton, and Portsmouth, are derived from daily local newspapers and used to investigate audience preferences. Box-office information for the Regent cinema, Portsmouth, is used to corroborate the POPSTAT Index values of those films screened during the year. A high correlation between the two is found. Comparisons between the POPSTAT charts are conducted using the RelPOP method, and differences in preferences are found for some British films. At the same time, many Hollywood productions are similarly popular across the three cities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Richards (1984, p. 18).
- 2.
- 3.
At this time, distributors were commonly referred to as renters in the UK.
- 4.
Low (1985, pp. 267–270).
- 5.
Sedgwick (2000, Table 4.4). Concerning risk, see the discussion on pp. 51–54.
- 6.
Garncarz (2015).
- 7.
These population figures are those given in the Kine Yearbooks of 1935 and 1936.
- 8.
Rowson (1936) found that 43% of admissions paid 7d or less, with another 37% paying no more than 12d.
- 9.
Rowson (1936, p. 76).
- 10.
Daniels and Jewkes (1928).
- 11.
Crafts (1987: Tables 2 and 3).
- 12.
Rowson (1936, Table III).
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
Sedgwick and Pafort-Overduin (2012).
- 16.
POPSTAT values for all films screened in Portsmouth were calculated using the same billing weights.
- 17.
To maintain compatibility with the Bolton and Brighton datasets, billing weights are simply 1 for single features and 0.5 for films in a double bill.
- 18.
Rowson (1936, p. 83).
- 19.
Rowson (1936, p. 83).
- 20.
- 21.
The table is particular to the three cities and differs substantially from that found in Sedgwick (2000, Appendix 3) for Great Britain in 1934.
- 22.
See Chapter “Introduction: ‘Millions of People Every Day’—Cinema as Part of the Quotidian of Life”, for an explanation of the RelPOP method.
- 23.
Unfinished Symphony was a joint Cine Allianz—Gaumont British joint production and shot in Vienna.
- 24.
Low (1985, pp. 141–142).
- 25.
Glancy (1999).
- 26.
Richards (1984).
- 27.
Sedgwick (2000, Table 4.4).
- 28.
Minutes of Evidence.
- 29.
Miskell (2016).
References
Crafts, N. (1987). Long-term unemployment in Britain in the 1930s. Economic History Review, 40(3).
Daniels, G., & Jewkes, J. (1928). The post-war depression in the Lancashire cotton industry. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 91(2), 153–206.
Eyles, A. (1993). ABC: The first name in entertainment. BFI.
Eyles, A. (1996). Gaumont British cinemas. BFI.
Furhammar, L. (1990). Stockholmspublikens biopreferenser under 1930-talet: en undersökningsrapport. Stockholm University Press.
Garncarz, J. (2015). Wechselnde Vorlieben: Über die Filmpräferenzen der Europäer, 1896–1939. Stoemfeld.
Garncarz, J. (2020). Begeisterte Zuschauer : Über die Filmpräferenzen der Deutschen in der NS-Zeit. Herbert von Halem.
Harper, S. (2004). A lower middle-class taste-community in the 1930s: Admissions figures at the Regent Cinema, Portsmouth, UK. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 24, 565–587.
Low, R. (1985). Film making in 1930’s Britain. George Allen and Unwin.
McKibbin, R. (1998). Classes and cultures: England, 1918–1951: A study of a democratic society. Oxford University Press.
Miskell, P. (2016). International films and international markets: The globalisation of Hollywood entertainment, C.1921–1951. Media History, 22(2),174–200.
Richards, J. (1984). The age of the dream palace. Routledge.
Rowson, S. (1936). A statistical survey of the cinema industry in Great Britain in 1934. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 99, 67–129.
Sedgwick, J. (2000). Filmgoing in 1930s Britain: A choice of pleasures. Exeter University Press.
Sedgwick, J. (2006). Cinemagoing in Portsmouth during the 1930s. Cinema Journal, 46, 52–85.
Sedgwick, J., & Pafort-Overduin, C. (2012). Understanding audience behaviour through statistical evidence: London and Amsterdam in the mid-1930s. In I. Christie (Ed.), Audiences (pp. 96–110). Amsterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Regression test results
Linear Regression | |||||||
Regression Statistics | |||||||
R | 0.94 | ||||||
R-square | 0.89 | ||||||
Adjusted R-square | 0.89 | ||||||
S | 1.32 | ||||||
N | 79 | ||||||
Column U = 7.77E-3 * Column P | |||||||
ANOVA | |||||||
d.f | SS | MS | F | p-level | |||
Regression | 1 | 1,111.53 | 1,111.53 | 640.41 | 0 | ||
Residual | 78. | 135.38 | 1.74 | ||||
Total | 79. | 1,246.92 | |||||
Coefficient | Standard Error | LCL | UCL | t Stat | p-level | H0 (5%) | |
Intercept | 0 | ||||||
Column P | 7.77E-3 | 3.07E-4 | 7.15E-3 | 8.38E-3 | 25.31 | 0 | rejected |
T (5%) | 1.99 | ||||||
LCL—Lower value of a reliable interval (LCL) | |||||||
UCL—Upper value of a reliable interval (UCL) |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sedgwick, J. (2022). Comparative Film Popularity in Three English Cities—Bolton, Brighton, and Portsmouth: An Exercise in POPSTAT Methodology. In: Sedgwick, J. (eds) Towards a Comparative Economic History of Cinema, 1930–1970. Frontiers in Economic History . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05770-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05770-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05769-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05770-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)