Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Advanced Mental Health Nursing Assessment, Formulation and Decision-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Practice in Mental Health Nursing

  • 1375 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to provide an understanding of advanced clinical assessment skills in mental health practice that considers the interface between physical and mental health, comorbidities, complexities and environmental and social factors. Advanced mental health assessment and decision-making require intuitive and analytic clinical reasoning, critical thinking, professional knowledge and shared decision-making. It also requires the integration of nursing knowledge, with knowledge from other fields (medicine, psychology, sociology, pharmacology). In addition, a comprehensive assessment needs to be underpinned by the principles of recovery, trauma-informed care and a strengths-based approach. Therefore, it stands to reason that these concepts will be incorporated in this chapter by focusing on the knowledge and skills required to build an account of why and how problems arise, developing collaborative formulation and goal settings, whilst managing the challenges and pitfalls of the essential part of the therapeutic process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Herdman TH, Kamitsuru S, Lopes CT. NANDA international nursing diagnoses: definitions and classifications, 2021–2023. 12th ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tanner CA. Thinking like a nurse: a research-based model of clinical judgement in nursing. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45(6):204–11. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20060601-04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schober M. Introduction to advanced nursing practice: an international focus. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Boeving W. HEE Over Herstel, Empowerment en Ervaringsdeskundigheid in de psychiatrie [phd dissertation]. Maastricht: University of Maastricht; 2017. https://www.trimbos.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2021/09/af1550-hee.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Department of Health. Strengths-based social work practice with adults: roundtable report United Kingdom: Department of Health; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shields-Zeeman L, Petrea I, Smit F, Hipple Walters B, Dedovic J, Rojnic Kuzman M, Nakov V, Nica R, Novotni A, Roth C, Tomcuk A, Wijnen BFM, Wensing M. Towards community-based and recovery-oriented care for severe mental disorders in Southern and Eastern Europe: aims and design of a multi-country implementation and evaluation study (RECOVER-E). Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020;14:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00361-y. eCollection 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199(6):445–52. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox J. The contribution of experiential wisdom to the development of the mental health professional discourse. Schizophr Bull. 2017;43(3):481–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbv082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Isobel S, Wilson A, Gill K, Howe D. ‘What would a trauma-informed mental health service look like?’ Perspectives of people who access services. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021;30(2):495–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12813. Epub 2020 Nov 21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reeves E. A synthesis of the literature on trauma-informed care. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015;36(9):698–709. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2015.1025319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rapp CA, Sullivan WP. The strengths model: birth to toddlerhood. Adv Soc Work. 2014;15(1):129–42. https://doi.org/10.18060/16643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Price A, Ahuja L, Bramwell C, Briscoe S, Shaw L, Nunns M, et al. Research evidence on different strengths-based approaches within adult social work: a systematic review. Southampton: NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research Topic Report; 2020. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr-tr-130867.

  13. Wand T, Acret L, D’Abrew N. Introducing solution-focussed brief therapy to mental health nurses across a local health district in Australia. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018;27(2):774–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12364. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersly P, et al. Shared decision-making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher A, Mills K, Teesson M, Marel C. Shared decision-making among people with problematic alcohol/other drug us and co-occurring mental health conditions: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021;40:307–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shared decision-making in mental health care. Practice, research, and future directions, SAMHSA. 2011. https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/d7/priv/sma09-4371.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2021.

  17. Alguera-Lara V, Dowsey MM, Ride J, Kinder S, Castle D. Shared decision making in mental health: the importance for current clinical practice. Australas Psychiatry. 2017;25(6):578–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856217734711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pohar Manhas K, Olson K, Churchill K, Vohra S, Wasylak T. Experiences of shared decision-making in community rehabilitation: a focused ethnography. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:329. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05223-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang C, Plummer V, Lam L, Cross W. Perceptions of shared decision-making in severe mental illness: an integrative review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020;27:103–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Menear M, Dugas M, Careau E, Chouinard MC, Dogba MJ, Gagnon MP, et al. Strategies for engaging patients and families in collaborative care programs for depression and anxiety disorders: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020;263:528–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haines A, Perkins E, Evans EA, McCabe R. Multidisciplinary team functioning and decision making within forensic mental health. Ment Health Rev (Brighton). 2018;23(3):185–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-01-2018-0001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marks J, Foster R, Gibson SL, Simpson A, Rinaldi M, Repper J, Worner J, Patel S, Lucock M, Ussher M, White S, Goldsmith L, Barlow S, Gillard S. Development of a peer support intervention to improve the experience and outcomes of discharge from inpatient mental health care: the role of experiential knowledge in a coproduced approach. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14(1):320. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05735-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Williamson P. A 4-step model of relationship-centered communication. In: Suchman A, Sluyter D, Williamson P, editors. Leading change in healthcare: transforming organizations using complexity, positive psychology and relationship centered care. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Argyle M. Bodily communication. 2nd ed. Madison: International Universities Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Egan G. The skilled helper: a systematic approach to effective helping. Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sunderland M, Batterham P, Calear A, Carragher N. Self-report scales for common mental disorders: an overview of current and emerging methods. In: Sellbom M, Suhr J, editors. The Cambridge handbook of clinical assessment and diagnosis (Cambridge handbooks in psychology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. p. 263–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235433.019.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Educ. 2017;17(4):137–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaed/mkw060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shoman Y, Majery N, Otelea M, Lambreghts C, Canu IG. How to identify the most suitable questionnaires and rating scales for your research and clinical practice? Int J Clin Pract. 2021;00:e14895. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S. Application and results of the Manchester short assessment of quality of life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1999;45(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076409904500102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gordon M. Manual of nursing diagnosis. 13th ed. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rookhuizen ED, Stringer B, Huising MS, de Ruijter E, van Meijel B. Prescribing psychotropic medication by the nurse practitioner in mental health care: an explorative study (article in Dutch). Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2017;59(4):229–233.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Earl EA, Taylor J, Peet M, Grant G. Nurse prescribing in specialist mental health (part 1): the views and experiences of practising and non-practising nurse prescribers and service users. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011;18(3):189–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01672.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Earl EA, Taylor J, Peet M, Grant G. Nurse prescribing in specialist mental health (part 2): the views and experiences of psychiatrists and health professionals. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011;18(4):281–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2009.01517.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Moorhead S, Swanson E, Johnson M, Maas M. Nursing outcome classification (NOC). 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Butcher HK, Bulechek GM, Dochterman JM, Wagner CM. Nursing interventions classification (NIC). 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Koekkoek B, van Meijel B, Perquin A, Hutschemeakers G. Decision-making on (dis)continuation of long-term treatment in mental health services is an interpersonal negotiation rather than an objective process: qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2072-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ameel M, Leino H, Kontio R, van Achterberg T, Junttila K. Using the nursing interventions classification to identify nursing interventions in free-text nursing documentation in adult psychiatric outpatient care setting. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(17–18):3435–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Buckley MR. Back to basics: using the DSM-5 to benefit clients. The Professional Counselor. 2014;4(3):159–65. https://doi.org/10.15241/mrb.4.3.159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gaebel W, Stricker J, Riesbeck M, Zielasek J, Kerst A, et.al. Accuracy of diagnostic classification and clinical utility assessment of ICD-11 compared to ICD-10 in 10 mental disorders: findings from a web-based field study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2020; 270(3): 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-019-01076-z.

  41. Van Os J, Delespaul P, Wigman J, Myin-Germeys I, Wichers M. Beyond DSM and ICD: introducing “precision diagnosis” for psychiatry using momentary assessment technology. World Psychiatry. 2013;12(2):113–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20046.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [Internet]. https://www.who.int/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health. Accessed 2 Feb 2021.

  43. Lundälv J, Törnbom M, Larsson P, Sunnerhagen KS. Awareness and the arguments for and against the international classification of functioning, disability and health among representatives of disability organisations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(3):3293–300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120303293.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Macneil CA, Hasty MK, Conus P, Berk M. Is diagnosis enough to guide interventions in mental health? Using case formulation in clinical practice. BMC Med. 2012;10(111):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Restifo S. An empirical categorization of psychosocial factors for clinical case formulation and treatment planning. Aust Psychiatry. 2010;18(3):210–3. https://doi.org/10.3109/10398561003681335. PMID: 20367292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Weerasekera P. Formulation: a multiperspective model. Can J Psychiatry. 1993;38(5):351–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379303800513. PMID: 8348476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Harder K, Munro I, Woodhouse A. Diagnostic systems used in clinical assessment. In: Edward K, Munro I, Welch A, Cross W, editors. Mental health nursing: dimensions of praxis. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 23–53.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Redhead S, Johnstone L, Nightingale J. Clients’ experiences of formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy. Psychol Psychother. 2015;88(4):453–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Richards DA, Richards A, Barkham M, Cahill J, Williams C. PHASE: a ‘health technology’ approach to psychological treatment in primary mental health care. Primary Health Care Res Dev. 2002;3(3):159–68. https://doi.org/10.1191/1463423602pc103oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Crowe MC, Carlyle D, Farmar R. Clinical formulation for mental health nursing practice. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2008;15(10):800–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2008.01307.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen SL, Hsu HY, Chang CF, Lin ECL. An exploration of the correlates of nurse practitioners’ clinical decision-making abilities. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(7–8):1016–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lee DSK, Lim Abdullah K, Subramanian P, Bachmann RT, Ong SL. An integrated review of the correlation between critical thinking ability and clinical decision-making in nursing. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26:4065–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hammond KR, Hamm RM, Grassia J, Pearson T. Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1987;17(5):753–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1987.6499282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Dhami MK, Mumpower JL, Kenneth R. Hammond’s contributions on the study of judgment and decision making. Judgm Decis Mak. 2018;13(1):1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  55. van Graan AC, Williams MJS, Koen MP. Professional nurses’ understanding of clinical judgement: a contextual inquiry. Health SA Gesondheid. 2016;21:280–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hsag.2016.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Shapiro F. The role of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in medicine: addressing the psychological and physical symptoms stemming from adverse life experiences. Perm J. 2014;18(1):71–7. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/13-098.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Peeters N, van Passel B, Krans J. The effectiveness of schema therapy for patients with anxiety disorders, OCD, or PTSD: a systematic review and research agenda. Br J Clin Psychol. 2021:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12324.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GGZ-VS University of Applied Science, Utrecht, the Netherlands

    Diana Polhuis

  2. University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Annmarie Grealish

Authors
  1. Diana Polhuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annmarie Grealish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Agnes Higgins

  2. School of Social Services and Health Care, Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Tampere, Finland

    Nina Kilkku

  3. School of Health Sciences, University of Akureyri, Akureyri, Iceland

    Gisli Kort Kristofersson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Polhuis, D., Grealish, A. (2022). Advanced Mental Health Nursing Assessment, Formulation and Decision-Making. In: Higgins, A., Kilkku, N., Kort Kristofersson, G. (eds) Advanced Practice in Mental Health Nursing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05536-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05536-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05535-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05536-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation