Skip to main content

Continuance Intention to Use YouTube Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Economy, Business Analytics, and Big Data Analytics Applications

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 1010))

Abstract

The current research attempts to examine how gratifications predict the continuance intention to use YouTube among university students. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to examine causal relations proposed in the research model. The sample comprised 446 students from selected universities in the United Arab Emirates. The research findings revealed that hedonic, escapism and social interaction gratifications have a significant impact on the continuance intention. However, it is unexpected to find that information seeking, mobility and information overload gratifications have an insignificant effect on the continuance intention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van den Eijnden RJJM, Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM (2016) The social media disorder scale. Comput Hum Behav 61:478–487

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen GM (2011) Tweet this: a uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Comput Hum Behav 27:755–762

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Z, Tchernev JM, Solloway T (2012) A dynamic longitudinal examination of social media use, needs and gratifications among college students. Comput Hum Behav 28:1829–1839

    Google Scholar 

  4. Susarla A, Jeong-Ha O, Tan Y (2012) Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: evidence from YouTube. Inf Syst Res 23(1):23–41

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kozinets RV (2019) Consuming techno-cultures: an extended JCR curation. J Consumer Res 46(3):620–627

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Bérail P, Guillon M, Bungener C (2019) The relations between YouTube addictions, social anxiety and parasocial relationships with YouTubers: a moderated-mediation model based on a cognitive-behavioral framework. Comput Hum Behav 99:190–204

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang C-M (2018) Understanding social networking sites continuance: the perspectives of gratifications, interactivity and network externalities. Online Inf Rev 42(6):989–1006

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim E, Lee JA, Sung Y, Choi SM (2016) Predicting selfie-posting behavior on social networking sites: an extension of theory of planned behavior. Comput Hum Behav 62:116–123

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khan ML (2017) Social media management: what motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Comput Hum Behav 66:236–247

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shifman L (2011) An anatomy of YouTube meme. New Media Soc 14(2):187–203

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee DY, Lehto MR (2013) User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Comput Educ 61:198–208

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moor PJ, Heuvelman A, Verleur R (2010) Flaming on YouTube. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1536–1546

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chiang H, Hsiao KL (2015) YouTube Stickiness: the needs, personal and environmental perspective. Internet Res 25(1):85–106

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dehghani M, Niaki MK, Ramezani I, Sal R (2016) Evaluating the influence of YouTube advertising for attraction of young customers. Comput Hum Behav 59:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones T, Cuthrell K (2011) YouTube: educational potentials and pitfalls. Comput Sch 28(1):75–85

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ha YW, Kim J, Libaque-Saenz CF, Chang Y, Park MC (2015) Use and gratifications of mobile SNSs: Facebook and Kakao Talk in Korea. Telematics Inform 32(3):7425–7438

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chaouali W (2016) Once a user, always a user: enablers and inhibitors of continuance intention of mobile social networking sites. Telematics Inform 33:1022–1033

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ifinedo P (2016) Applying uses and gratifications theory and social influence processes to understand students’ pervasive adoption of social networking sites: perspectives from the Americas. Int J Inf Manage 36:192–206

    Google Scholar 

  19. Joo J, Sang YM (2013) Exploring Koreans smartphone usage: an integrated model of the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory. Comput Hum Behav 29:2512–2518

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rokito S, Choi YH, Taylor SH, Bazarova NN (2018) Over-gratified, under-gratified, or just-night? Applying the gratification discrepancy approach in investigates recurrent Facebook use. Comput Hum Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.041

  21. Al-Jabri I, Sadiq SM, Ndubisi NO (2015) Understanding the usage of global networking sites by Arabs through the lens of uses and gratifications theory. J Sci Manage 26(4):662–680

    Google Scholar 

  22. Phua J, Jin SV, Kim JJ (2017) Uses and gratifications of social Networking sites by bridging and bonding social capital: a comparison of Facebook Twitter, Instagram and Snapchat. Comput Hum Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041

  23. Gan C, Hongxiu L (2018) Understanding the effects of gratifications on the continuance intention to use WeChat in China: a perspective on uses and gratifications. Comput Hum Behav 78:306–315

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alhabash S, Chiang YH, Huang K (2014) MAM & U&G in Taiwan: differences in the uses and gratifications of Facebook as a function of motivational reactivity. Comput Hum Behav 35:423–430

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gonzalez R, Gasco J, Liopis J (2019) University students and online social networks: effects and typology. J Bus Res 101:707–714

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huang J (2018) Timing of web personalization in mobile shopping: a perspective from users and gratifications theory. Comput Hum Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.chb.2018.06.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krause AE, North AC, Heritage B (2014) The uses and gratifications of using Facebook music listening applications. Comput Hum Behav 39:71–77

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li H, Liu Y, Xu X, Heikkila J, Van Der Heijden H (2015) Modeling hedonic is continuance through the uses and gratifications: an empirical study in online games. Comput Hum Behav 48:261–272

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dajani D, Yaseen SG (2016) The applicability of technology acceptance models in the Arab business setting. J Retail Manage Res 10(3):46–56

    Google Scholar 

  30. Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q 36(1):157–178

    Google Scholar 

  31. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) Users’ acceptance of information technology toward a united view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478

    Google Scholar 

  32. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–339

    Google Scholar 

  33. Davis FD (1993) User acceptance of information technology: systems characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man Mach Stud 38(3):475–487

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bagozzi R (2007) The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(4):244–254

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yaseen SG, El Qirem I (2018) Intention to use-e-banking services in the Jordanian commercial banks. Int J Bank Market 36(3):557–571

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes 50:179–211

    Google Scholar 

  39. Venkatesh V (2006) Where to go from here? Thought on future directions for research on individual-level technology adoption with a focus on decision making. Decis Sci 37(4):497–517

    Google Scholar 

  40. Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Chan FKY, Hu PJ-H, Brown SA (2011) Extending the two-stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context. Inf Syst J. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575-2011.00373

  41. Al Omoush KS, Yaseen SG, Almaaitah MA (2012) The impact of Arab cultural values on online social networking. The case of Facebook. Comput Hum Behav 28:2387–2399

    Google Scholar 

  42. Yaseen SG, Al Omoush KS (2020) Mobile crowdsourcing technology acceptance and engagement in crisis management: the case of Syrian refugees. Int J Technol Human Interact 6(3):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  43. Grellhesl M, Punyanunt-Carter NM (2012) Using the uses and gratifications theory to understand gratifications sought through text messaging practices of male and female undergraduate students. Comput Hum Behav 28:2175–2181

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou Z, Fang Y, Vogel DR, Jin X-L, Zhang X (2012) Attracted to or locked in? Predicting continuance intention in social virtual world services. J Manag Inf Syst 29(1):273–306

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lin J (2014) The effects of gratifications on intention to read citizen journalism news: the mediating effect of attitude. Comput Hum Behav 36:129–137

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kuem J, Khansa L, Kim SS (2020) Prominence and engagement: different mechanisms regulating continuance and contribution in online communities. J Manag Inf Syst 37(1):162–190

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kaur P, Dhir A, Chen S, Malibari A, Almotairi M (2020) Why do people purchase virtual goods? A uses and gratifications (U&G) theory perspective. Telematics Inform. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101376

  48. Gan C (2017) Understanding WeChat users liking behavior: an empirical study in China. Comput Hum Behav 68:30–39

    Google Scholar 

  49. Whiting A, Williams D (2013) Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. J Cetacean Res Manag 16(4):362–369

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gao Q, Feng C (2016) Branding with social media: user’s gratifications usage patterns, and brand message content strategies. Comput Hum Behav 63:868–890

    Google Scholar 

  51. Brinkman CS, Gabriel S, Paravati E (2020) Social achievement goals and social media. Comput Hum Behav 111:106427

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hicks A, Comp S, Horovitz J, Hovarter M, Miki M, Bevan JL (2012) Why people use Yelp.Com: an exploration of uses and gratifications. Comput Hum Behav 28(6):2274–2279

    Google Scholar 

  53. Li Y, Yang S, Zhang S, Zhang W (2019) Mobile social media use intention in emergencies among Gen Y in China: an integrative framework of gratifications, task-technology fit, and media dependency. Telematics Inform 42:1012–1044

    Google Scholar 

  54. Beaudoin CE (2008) Explaining the relationship between internet use and interpersonal trust: taking into account motivation und information overload. J Comput-Mediat Commun 13:550–568

    Google Scholar 

  55. Schmitt JB, Debbelt CA, Schneider FM (2017) Too much information? Predictors of information overload in the context of online news exposure. Inf Commun Soc. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1305427

  56. Sarstedt M, Hair JF, Cheah JH, Becker J-M, Ringle CM (2019) How to specify, estimate and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australas Mark J 27:197–211

    Google Scholar 

  57. Huang YM (2019) Examining students continued use of desktop services: perspectives from expectation-confirmation and social influence. Comput Hum Behav 96:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hair JF, Howard MC, Nitzl C (2020) Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J Bus Res 109:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics, University of Michigan, working paper no. 266, 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM (2018) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11.2018-0203

  61. Yaseen SG, Saib A, Nesrine A (2018) Leadership styles, absorptive capacity and firm’s innovation. Int J Knowl Manage 14(3):82–100

    Google Scholar 

  62. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF (2017) Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In: Handbook of market research, vol 26, pp 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hair JF, Hult TM, Ringle CM (2017) Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. J Acad Mark Sci 45:616–632

    Google Scholar 

  65. Moghavvemi S, Suliman A, Jaafar NI, Kasem N (2018) Social media as complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: the case of YouTube. Int J Manage Educ 16:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lau WWF (2017) Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Comput Hum Behav 68:286–291

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saad G. Yassen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yassen, S.G., Dajani, D., El-Qirem, I.A., Eletter, S.F. (2022). Continuance Intention to Use YouTube Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory. In: Yaseen, S.G. (eds) Digital Economy, Business Analytics, and Big Data Analytics Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1010. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05258-3_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics