Abstract
CO2 capture and utilization are effective techniques to use CO2 for different purposes to reduce the impact of CO2 emission on the environment. Two main sectors that dominate the CO2 emission are electricity and heat production and transport. The concept of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) for renewable fuel synthesis contributes to decreasing CO2 emission; besides, the CCUS provides to produce renewable fuel to be used in the sectors. There have been many recent academic and industrial research efforts to implement CCUS into heat, power, and transport systems. Although this concept shows very good performance in terms of environment, there is still very low knowledge about the thermodynamic performance of the process employed in this concept. The mathematical modeling approaches are an effective tool to understand the performance under variable working conditions. In this chapter, a brief introduction to the concepts of CO2 capture, separation, and utilization is presented. The basic mathematical modeling approaches to be applied for CO2 capture and separation techniques are discussed systematically. Moreover, two main components, which are membrane reactor and CO2 electrolyzer, are considered in this chapter for fuel synthesis through CO2 utilization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abu-Zahra MRM, Niederer JPM, Feron PHM, Versteeg GF (2007) CO2 capture from power plants: Part II. A parametric study of the economical performance based on mono-ethanolamine. Int J Greenh Gas Contr 1(2):135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00032-1
Adams EE, Caldeira K (2008) Ocean storage of CO2. Elements 4(5):319–324. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.4.5.319
Akabane S, Dohkoh T, Tsuji M, Nakajima T, Kawabata Y, Ide T, Nakamura K, Hatae T (2021) Principle demonstration of fuel cell system with CO2 capture. ECS Trans 103(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1149/10301.0041ecst
Arias AM, Mussati MC, Mores PL, Scenna NJ, Caballero JA, Mussati SF (2016) Optimization of multi-stage membrane systems for CO2 capture from flue gas. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 53:371–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.005
Babu P, Linga P, Kumar R, Englezos P (2015) A review of the hydrate based gas separation (HBGS) process for carbon dioxide pre-combustion capture. Energy 85:261–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.103
Basu S, Khan LA, Cano-Odena A, Liu C, Vankelecom IFJ (2010) Membrane-based technologies for biogas separations. Chem Soc Rev 39(2):750–768. https://doi.org/10.1039/B817050A
Brunetti A, Scura F, Barbieri G, Drioli E (2010) Membrane technologies for CO2 separation. J Membr Sci 359(1):115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.040
Bui M, Gunawan I, Verheyen V, Feron P, Meuleman E, Adeloju S (2014) Dynamic modelling and optimisation of flexible operation in post-combustion CO2 capture plants—a review. Comput Chem Eng 61:245–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.11.015
Cormos A-M, Simon A (2015) Assessment of CO2 capture by calcium looping (CaL) process in a flexible power plant operation scenario. Appl Therm Eng 80:319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.01.059
Cuéllar-Franca RM, Azapagic A (2015) Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. J CO2 Utiliz 9:82–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001
Currie R, Fowler MW, Simakov DSA (2019) Catalytic membrane reactor for CO2 hydrogenation using renewable streams: model-based feasibility analysis. Chem Eng J 372:1240–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.214
Daggash HA, Patzschke CF, Heuberger CF, Zhu L, Hellgardt K, Fennell PS, Bhave AN, Bardow A, Dowell NM (2018) Closing the carbon cycle to maximise climate change mitigation: power-to-methanol vs. power-to-direct air capture. Sustain Energy Fuels 2(6):1153–1169. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SE00061A
Dantas TLP, Luna FMT, Silva IJ Jr, Torres AEB, de Azevedo DCS, Rodrigues AE, Moreira RFPM (2011) Modeling of the fixed—bed adsorption of carbon dioxide and a carbon dioxide—nitrogen mixture on zeolite 13X. Braz J Chem Eng 28(3):533–544. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322011000300018
Dave N, Do T, Palfreyman D, Feron PHM (2011) Impact of liquid absorption process development on the costs of post-combustion capture in Australian coal-fired power stations. Chem Eng Res Des 89(9):1625–1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.09.010
Delacourt C, Newman J (2010) Mathematical modeling of CO2 reduction to CO in aqueous electrolytes: II. Study of an electrolysis cell making syngas from and reduction at room temperature. J Electrochem Soc 157(12):B1911. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3502533
Delacourt C, Ridgway PL, Newman J (2010) Mathematical modeling of CO2 reduction to CO in aqueous electrolytes: I. kinetic study on planar silver and gold electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 157(12):B1902. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3502532
Duan L, Xia K, Feng T, Jia S, Bian J (2016) Study on coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture by integrating molten carbonate fuel cell system. Energy 117:578–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.063
Fernández JR, Garcia S, Sanz-Pérez ES (2020) CO2 capture and utilization editorial. Ind Eng Chem Res 59(15):6767–6772. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01643
García S, Gil MV, Martín CF, Pis JJ, Rubiera F, Pevida C (2011) Breakthrough adsorption study of a commercial activated carbon for pre-combustion CO2 capture. Chem Eng J 171(2):549–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.04.027
Gaspar J, Jørgensen JB, Fosbøl PL (2015) A dynamic mathematical model for packed columns in carbon capture plants. Europ Contr Conf (ECC) 2015:2738–2743. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECC.2015.7330952
Grande CA, Ribeiro RPPL, Rodrigues AE (2009) CO2 capture from NGCC power stations using electric swing adsorption (ESA). Energy Fuels 23(5):2797–2803. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef8010756
Greer T, Bedelbayev A, Igreja JM, Gomes JF, Lie B (2010) A simulation study on the abatement of CO2 emissions by de-absorption with monoethanolamine. Environ Technol 31(1):107–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330903373764
Habib MA, Badr HM, Ahmed SF, Ben-Mansour R, Mezghani K, Imashuku S, la O’ GJ, Shao-Horn Y, Mancini ND, Mitsos A, Kirchen P, Ghoneim AF (2011) A review of recent developments in carbon capture utilizing oxy-fuel combustion in conventional and ion transport membrane systems. Int J Energy Res 35(9):741–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1798
Hafeez S, Al-Salem SM, Manos G, Constantinou A (2020) Fuel production using membrane reactors: a review. Environ Chem Lett
Hajilary N, Rezakazemi M (2018) CFD modeling of CO2 capture by water-based nanofluids using hollow fiber membrane contactor. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 77:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.08.002
Hapońska M, Nurra C, Abelló S, Makkee M, Salvadó J, Torras C (2019) Membrane reactors for biodiesel production with strontium oxide as a heterogeneous catalyst. Fuel Process Technol 185:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.11.010
Hasan MMF, Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA (2012) Modeling, simulation, and optimization of postcombustion CO2 capture for variable feed concentration and flow rate. 2. Pressure swing adsorption and vacuum swing adsorption processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(48):15665–15682. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie301572n
Hidalgo D, Martín-Marroquín JM (2020) Power-to-methane, coupling CO2 capture with fuel production: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 132:110057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110057
Iancu P, Velea S, Plesu V, Muscalu C, David D (2010) Modelling and simulation of co2 absorption in alkaline buffer solutions in gproms. Chem Eng Trans 21:679–684. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1021114
Ince AC, Colpan CO, Hagen A, Serincan MF (2021) Modeling and simulation of power-to-X systems: a review. Fuel 304:121354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121354
Jansen D, Gazzani M, Manzolini G, van Dijk E, Carbo M (2015) Pre-combustion CO2 capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 40:167–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.028
Jeanmonod G, Wang L, Diethelm S, Maréchal F, Van herle, J. (2019) Trade-off designs of power-to-methane systems via solid-oxide electrolyzer and the application to biogas upgrading. Appl Energy 247:572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.055
Jiang Y, Chen F, Xia C (2021) A review on cathode processes and materials for electro-reduction of carbon dioxide in solid oxide electrolysis cells. J Power Sour 493:229713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229713
Kannan V, Raman KA, Fisher A, Birgersson E (2019) Correlating uncertainties of a CO 2 to CO microfluidic electrochemical reactor: a monte carlo simulation. Ind Eng Chem Res 58(42):19361–19376. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04596
Klinsrisuk S, Tao S, Irvine JTS (2015) 18—Membrane reactors for ammonia production. In Basile A, Di Paola L, Hai Fl, Piemonte V (eds) Membrane reactors for energy applications and basic chemical production, pp 543–563. Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-223-5.00018-2
Kopač D, Huš M, Ogrizek M, Likozar B (2017) Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of methanol synthesis from carbon dioxide and hydrogen on Cu(111) catalysts: statistical uncertainty study. J Phys Chem C 121(33):17941–17949. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04985
Kotb Y, Fateen S-EK, Albo J, Ismail I (2017) Modeling of a microfluidic electrochemical cell for the electro-reduction of CO2 to CH3OH. J Electrochem Soc 164(13):E391. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0741713jes
Koytsoumpa EI, Bergins C, Kakaras E (2018) The CO2 economy: review of CO2 capture and reuse technologies. J Supercrit Fluids 132:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.029
Küngas R, Blennow P, Heiredal-Clausen T, Holt T, Rass-Hansen J, Primdahl S, Hansen JB (2017) eCOs—a commercial CO2 electrolysis system developed by Haldor Topsoe. ECS Trans 78(1):2879. https://doi.org/10.1149/07801.2879ecst
Lawal A, Wang M, Stephenson P, Koumpouras G, Yeung H (2010) Dynamic modelling and analysis of post-combustion CO2 chemical absorption process for coal-fired power plants. Fuel 89(10):2791–2801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.05.030
Lee WH, Ko Y-J, Choi Y, Lee SY, Choi CH, Hwang YJ, Min BK, Strasser P, Oh H-S (2020) Highly selective and scalable CO2 to CO—electrolysis using coral-nanostructured Ag catalysts in zero-gap configuration. Nano Energy 76:105030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105030
Li Q, Fan S, Chen Q, Yang G, Chen Y, Li L, Li G (2019) Experimental and process simulation of hydrate-based CO2 capture from biogas. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 72:103008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2019.103008
Liang S, Altaf N, Huang L, Gao Y, Wang Q (2020) Electrolytic cell design for electrochemical CO2 reduction. J CO2 Util 35, 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2019.09.007
Liu H, Su Y, Kuang S, Hensen EJM, Zhang S, Ma X (2021) Highly efficient CO2 electrolysis within a wide operation window using octahedral tin oxide single crystals. J Mater Chem A 9(12):7848–7856. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA00285F
Liuzzi D, Pérez-Alonso FJ, Fierro JLG, Rojas S, van Wijk FL, Roghair I, Annaland M van S, Fernandez E, Viviente JL, Tanaka DAP (2016) Catalytic membrane reactor for the production of biofuels. Catalysis Today, 268, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.11.014
Lu X, Leung DYC, Wang H, Xuan J (2018) Microfluidics-based pH-differential reactor for CO2 utilization: a mathematical study. Appl Energy 227:525–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.191
Luis P (2016) Use of monoethanolamine (MEA) for CO 2 capture in a global scenario: consequences and alternatives. Desalination 380:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.004
Lv H, Lin L, Zhang X, Song Y, Matsumoto H, Zeng C, Ta N, Liu W, Gao D, Wang G, Bao X (2020) In Situ ınvestigation of reversible exsolution/dissolution of CoFe alloy nanoparticles in a Co‐Doped Sr 2 Fe 1.5 Mo 0.5 O 6−δ Cathode for CO 2 electrolysis. Adv Mater 32(6):1906193. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201906193
Marocco Stuardi F, MacPherson F, Leclaire J (2019) Integrated CO2 capture and utilization: a priority research direction. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 16:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.02.003
Marx D, Joss L, Hefti M, Mazzotti M (2016) Temperature swing adsorption for postcombustion CO2 capture: single- and multicolumn experiments and simulations. Ind Eng Chem Res 55(5):1401–1412. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03727
Masson-Delmotte, Zhai, Pörtner, Roberts D, Skea, Shukla, Pirani, Moufouma-Okia, Péan, Pidcock, Connors, Matthews, Chen, Zhou, Gomis, Lonnoy, Maycock, Tignor, Waterfield (2018) IPCC, 2018: summary for policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, p 32. World Meteorological Organization.
Mastropasqua L, Pierangelo L, Spinelli M, Romano MC, Campanari S, Consonni S (2019) Molten carbonate fuel cells retrofits for CO2 capture and enhanced energy production in the steel industry. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 88:195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.05.033
Mikulčić H, Ridjan Skov I, Dominković DF, Wan Alwi SR, Manan ZA, Tan R, Duić N, Hidayah Mohamad SN, Wang X (2019) Flexible carbon capture and utilization technologies in future energy systems and the utilization pathways of captured CO2. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 114:109338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109338
Mondino G, Grande CA, Blom R, Nord LO (2019) Moving bed temperature swing adsorption for CO2 capture from a natural gas combined cycle power plant. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 85:58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.03.021
Najari S, Gróf G, Saeidi S, Bihari P, Chen W-H (2020) Modeling and statistical analysis of the three-side membrane reactor for the optimization of hydrocarbon production from CO2 hydrogenation. Energy Convers Manage 207:112481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112481
Nalbant Y, Colpan CO (2020) An overview of hydrogen production from biogas. In Uyar TS (ed) Accelerating the transition to a 100% renewable energy era, pp 355–373. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40738-4_16
Narasimhaiah G, Janardhanan VM (2013) Modeling CO2 electrolysis in solid oxide electrolysis cell. J Solid State Electrochem 17(8):2361–2370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-013-2081-8
Ni M (2010) Modeling of a solid oxide electrolysis cell for carbon dioxide electrolysis. Chem Eng J 164(1):246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.032
Olah GA, Prakash GKS, Goeppert A (2011) Anthropogenic chemical carbon cycle for a sustainable future. J Am Chem Soc 133(33):12881–12898. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja202642y
Panzone C, Philippe R, Chappaz A, Fongarland P, Bengaouer A (2020) Power-to-liquid catalytic CO2 valorization into fuels and chemicals: focus on the Fischer-Tropsch route. J CO2 Util 38:314–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2020.02.009
Puxty G, Rowland R, Allport A, Yang Q, Bown M, Burns R, Maeder M, Attalla M (2009) Carbon dioxide postcombustion capture: a novel screening study of the carbon dioxide absorption performance of 76 Amines. Environ Sci Technol 43(16):6427–6433. https://doi.org/10.1021/es901376a
Riboldi L, Bolland O (2017) Overview on pressure swing adsorption (PSA) as CO2 capture technology: State-of-the-art, limits and potentials. Energy Procedia 114:2390–2400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1385
Rogelj J, Geden O, Cowie A, Reisinger A (2021a) Net-zero emissions targets are vague: three ways to fix. Nature 591(7850):365–368. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00662-3
Rogelj J, Geden O, Cowie A, Reisinger A (2021b) Three ways to improve net-zero emissions targets. Nature 591:365–368. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00662-3
Salvatore DA, Weekes DM, He J, Dettelbach KE, Li YC, Mallouk TE, Berlinguette CP (2018) Electrolysis of gaseous CO2 to CO in a flow cell with a bipolar membrane. ACS Energy Lett 3(1):149–154. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01017
Samanta A, Zhao A, Shimizu GKH, Sarkar P, Gupta R (2012) Post-combustion CO2 capture using solid sorbents: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(4):1438–1463. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie200686q
Schneider J, Jia H, Muckerman JT, Fujita E (2012) Thermodynamics and kinetics of CO2, CO, and H+ binding to the metal centre of CO2 reductioncatalysts. Chem Soc Rev 41(6):2036–2051. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CS15278E
Shen Y, Shi W, Zhang D, Na P, Fu B (2018) The removal and capture of CO2 from biogas by vacuum pressure swing process using silica gel. J CO2 Util 27:259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.08.001
Shi Y, Luo Y, Cai N, Qian J, Wang S, Li W, Wang H (2013) Experimental characterization and modeling of the electrochemical reduction of CO2 in solid oxide electrolysis cells. Electrochim Acta 88:644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.10.107
Sifat NS, Haseli Y (2019) A critical review of CO2 capture technologies and prospects for clean power generation. Energies 12(21):4143. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12214143
Sinha A, Darunte LA, Jones CW, Realff MJ, Kawajiri Y (2017) Systems design and economic analysis of direct air capture of CO 2 through temperature vacuum swing adsorption using MIL-101(Cr)-PEI-800 and mmen-Mg 2 (dobpdc) MOF adsorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(3):750–764. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b03887
Skafte TL, Blennow P, Hjelm J, Graves C (2018) Carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning during CO2 electrolysis in nickel-based solid oxide cell electrodes. J Power Sources 373:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.10.097
Sohaib Q, Muhammad A, Younas M, Rezakazemi M (2020) Modeling pre-combustion CO2 capture with tubular membrane contactor using ionic liquids at elevated temperatures. Sep Purif Technol 241:116677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116677
Song C, Liu Q, Deng S, Li H, Kitamura Y (2019) Cryogenic-based CO2 capture technologies: State-of-the-art developments and current challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 101:265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.018
Sun S, Sun H, Williams T, P., & Wu, C. (2021) Recent advances in integrated CO2 capture and utilization: a review. Sustain Energy Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SE00797A
Tan LS, Shariff AM, Tay WH, Lau KK, Halim HNA (2016) Integrated mathematical modeling for prediction of rich CO2 absorption in structured packed column at elevated pressure conditions. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 28:737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.11.004
Tanaka K, O’Neill BC (2018) The Paris Agreement zero-emissions goal is not always consistent with the 1.5 °C and 2 °C temperature targets. Nature Clim Change 8(4):319–324. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0097-x
Thitakamol B, Veawab A, Aroonwilas A (2007) Environmental impacts of absorption-based CO2 capture unit for post-combustion treatment of flue gas from coal-fired power plant. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 1(3):318–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00042-4
Tian M, Yu Z, Zhao H, Yin J (2018) Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated solid oxide fuel cell, Organic Rankine Cycle and absorption chiller trigeneration system with CO2 capture. Energy Convers Manage 171:350–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.108
Tuinier MJ, Hamers HP, van Sint Annaland M (2011) Techno-economic evaluation of cryogenic CO2 capture—a comparison with absorption and membrane technology. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5(6):1559–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.08.013
Usman M, Dai Z, Hillestad M, Deng L (2017) Mathematical modeling and validation of CO2 mass transfer in a membrane contactor using ionic liquids for pre-combustion CO2 capture. Chem Eng Res Des 123:377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.05.026
Vasudevan S, Farooq S, Karimi IA, Saeys M, Quah MCG, Agrawal R (2016) Energy penalty estimates for CO2 capture: comparison between fuel types and capture-combustion modes. Energy 103:709–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.154
Vázquez FV, Koponen J, Ruuskanen V, Bajamundi C, Kosonen A, Simell P, Ahola J, Frilund C, Elfving J, Reinikainen M, Heikkinen N, Kauppinen J, Piermartini P (2018) Power-to-X technology using renewable electricity and carbon dioxide from ambient air: SOLETAIR proof-of-concept and improved process concept. J CO2 Util 28:235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.09.026
Vilardi G, Bassano C, Deiana P, Verdone N (2020) Exergy and energy analysis of three biogas upgrading processes. Energy Convers Manage 224:113323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113323
Voormeij D, Simandl G (2004) Geological, Ocean, and mineral CO2 sequestration options: a technical review. Geosci Can 31(1):11–22
Wang L, Murata K, Inaba M (2003) Production of pure hydrogen and more valuable hydrocarbons from ethane on a novel highly active catalyst system with a Pd-based membrane reactor. Catal Today 82(1):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(03)00207-4
Wang H, Leung DYC, Xuan J (2013) Modeling of a microfluidic electrochemical cell for CO2 utilization and fuel production. Appl Energy 102:1057–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.020
Wang Y, Zhao L, Otto A, Robinius M, Stolten D (2017) A review of post-combustion CO2 capture technologies from coal-fired power plants. Energy Procedia 114:650–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1209
Wang G, Pan J, Jiang SP, Yang H (2018) Gas phase electrochemical conversion of humidified CO2 to CO and H2 on proton-exchange and alkaline anion-exchange membrane fuel cell reactors. J CO2 Util 23:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.11.010
Won W, Lee S, Lee K-S (2012) Modeling and parameter estimation for a fixed-bed adsorption process for CO2 capture using zeolite 13X. Sep Purif Technol 85:120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.09.056
Wu F, Argyle MD, Dellenback PA, Fan M (2018) Progress in O2 separation for oxy-fuel combustion–a promising way for cost-effective CO2 capture: a review. Prog Energy Combust Sci 67:188–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.01.004
Xi X, Liu J, Fan Y, Wang L, Li J, Li M, Luo J-L, Fu X-Z (2021) Reducing d-p band coupling to enhance CO2 electrocatalytic activity by Mg-doping in Sr2FeMoO6-δ double perovskite for high performance solid oxide electrolysis cells. Nano Energy 82:105707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105707
Zhang J, Webley PA, Xiao P (2008) Effect of process parameters on power requirements of vacuum swing adsorption technology for CO2 capture from flue gas. Energy Convers Manage 49(2):346–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.06.007
Zhang L, Hu S, Zhu X, Yang W (2017) Electrochemical reduction of CO2 in solid oxide electrolysis cells. J Energy Chem 26(4):593–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2017.04.004
Zhang G, Jin W, Xu N (2018) Design and fabrication of ceramic catalytic membrane reactors for green chemical engineering applications. Engineering 4(6):848–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.05.001
Zhang Z, Zhang W, Lichtfouse E (2020) Membranes for environmental applications. Springer. https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=6126378
Zhong H, Fujii K, Nakano Y (2016) Electroactive species study in the electrochemical reduction of CO2 in KHCO3 solution at elevated temperature. J Energy Chem 25(3):517–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2016.01.019
Zhou Y, Lin L, Song Y, Zhang X, Lv H, Liu Q, Zhou Z, Ta N, Wang G, Bao X (2020) Pd single site-anchored perovskite cathode for CO2 electrolysis in solid oxide electrolysis cells. Nano Energy 71:104598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104598
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ince, A.C., Colpan, C.O., Serincan, M.F. (2022). CO2 Capture and Utilization for Fuel Synthesis. In: Uyar, T.S., Javani, N. (eds) Renewable Energy Based Solutions. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 87. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05125-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05125-8_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05124-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05125-8
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)