Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are Natural Conversations Natural? Critical Reflections on Using Participants’ Self-Recorded Conversations, the Positioning of Researchers, and Participant Self-Censorship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Designing Second Language Study Abroad Research

  • 247 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reflects on two dilemmas that emerged in audio recorded conversations for study abroad research and reveals the role of research and researcher in shaping conversations that were intended to be spontaneous. The first dilemma relates to how the researcher was spoken to in recorded dyadic conversations in which they were not present. In one project that involved 17 dyads (17 American students in China and their 17 Chinese roommates), each participant was instructed to record their routine, spontaneous conversations. Yet, the NVivo coding process shows that these participants frequently addressed the researcher during these recordings. In other instances, their conversations centered around the research goal provided in prior consent forms. While these conversations can still be considered spontaneous, they show the need to reflect upon the relationship between researcher and researched in language use research (Cameron et al., Researching language: Issues of power and method, 1–28, 1992).

The second dilemma relates to participants’ requests to delete parts of recordings or switch off the recorder during recording sessions. Two such requests took place during an ethnographic project focusing on interactions between study abroad students and their Chinese hosts. Both requests were from the Chinese hosts and concerned discussions about a widely known political scandal in China’s central government. These requests were moments when the researcher was seen more as an insider and trusted member the conversation and less as an outsider. The Chinese hosts felt this need as they became aware of the eventual publication of findings. This chapter argues for study abroad scholars to more broadly consider ethics in study abroad research conducted in contexts where participants engage in political censorship and self-censorship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    All participants’ names are pseudonyms to protect their identity.

  2. 2.

    All transcriptions presented here were translated into English from Chinese.

  3. 3.

    The spoken form in Chinese for the singular third-person pronoun, ta, is gender neutral and can also refer to non-human objects.

References

  • Anya, U. (2011). Connecting with communities of learners and speakers: Integrative ideals, experiences, and motivations of successful black second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 441–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buch, E. D., & Staller, K. M. (2007). The feminist practice of ethnography. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. L. Leavy (Eds.), Feminist research practice (pp. 187–221). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucholtz, M. (2007). Variation in transcription. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 784–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, M. B. H., & Richardson, K. (1992). Introduction. In D. Cameron, E. Frazer, P. Harvey, M. B G. Rampton, & K. Richardson (Eds.), Researching language: Issues of power and method (pp. 1–28). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constas, M. A. (1992). Qualitative analysis as a public event: The documentation of category development procedures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Costa, P. I. (2018). Toward great diversity and social equity in language education research. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 15(4), 302–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–32). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao, W. (2011). Study abroad, participation and turn taking: A case study. In G. Granena, J. Koeth, S. Lee-Ellis, A. Lukyanchenko, G. P. Botana, & E. Rhoades (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2010 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 1–17). Cascadilla Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao, W. (2013). Learning Mandarin and socializing stance during a semester in China [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao, W. (2016). Peer socialization into gendered L2 Mandarin language practices in a study abroad context: Talk in the dorm. Applied Linguistics. 37(5), 599–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao, W., & Trentman, E. (2016). Politicizing study abroad: Learning Arabic in Egypt and Mandarin in China. L2 Journal, 8(2), 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diao, W., Wang, Y., & Chen, C. (2019). The DormTalk Project. Retrieved from: https://dormtalk.arizona.edu/

  • Diao, W., & Wang, Y. (2021). Transcending gender taboos: Talk in the dorm among female study abroad students in China. International Journal of Chinese Language Education, 9, 93–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, X., & Luo, S. (2017). Laoshi, zao shang hao! Good morning, teacher? Respecting cultural differences when greeting a teacher. English Today, 33(3), 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heigham, J., & Croker, R. A. (Eds.) (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, M. (2003). The listening subject of Japanese modernity and his auditory double: Citing, sighting, and siting the modern Japanese woman. Cultural Anthropology, (2), 156–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, R. (2009). Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000. Language Teaching, 42(2), 147–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, (2), 326–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinginger, C. (2019). Four questions for the next generation of study abroad researchers. In M. Howard (ed.), Study abroad, second langauge acquisition and interculturality (pp. 263–290). Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, R., & Miller, E. R. (2017). Re-examining and re-envisioning criticality in language studies: Theories and praxis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14, 157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-H. (2017). Developing awareness and use of compliments in the Chinese homestay: A longitudinal case study. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(4), 441–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. (2020). Study abroad otherwise. In R. Criser & E. Malakaj (Eds.), Diversity and decolonization in German studies (pp. 157–176). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J., & Fernandez, J. (2019). Theorizing qualitative interviews: Two autoethnographic reconstructions. Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, J. (2012). Tale of two tales: Locally produced accounts and memberships during research interviews with a multilingual speaker. Modern Language Journal, (4), 489–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M. (2014). Ethical use of qualitative data and findings. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. SAGE

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. Developmental Pragmatics, 10(1), 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plews, J. L. (2016). The post-sojourn in study abroad research—Another frontier. Comparative and International Education, 45(2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rallis, S. F., & Rossman, G. B. (2009). Ethics and trustworthiness. In J. Heigham & R. A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics (pp. 263–287). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shively, R. L. (2011). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1818–1835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. A. (2002). “Natural” and “contrived” data: A sustainable distinction. DiscourseStudies, 4(4), 511–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trentman, E., & Diao, W. (2017) The American gaze east: Cultural discourses of learning Mandarin and Arabic overseas. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 2(2), 175–205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of East Asian Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Wenhao Diao

Authors
  1. Wenhao Diao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenhao Diao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of German Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Janice McGregor

  2. Department of Languages and Cultures, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS, Canada

    John L. Plews

Appendices

Appendix

Convention of Transcription

(notes):

transcriber’s notes

=:

latched talk

[overlapping]:

overlapping talk

Italic :

Italic refers to portions of talk that was initially in English

word--:

denotes prolonged pronunciation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Diao, W. (2022). Are Natural Conversations Natural? Critical Reflections on Using Participants’ Self-Recorded Conversations, the Positioning of Researchers, and Participant Self-Censorship. In: McGregor, J., Plews, J.L. (eds) Designing Second Language Study Abroad Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05053-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05053-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05052-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05053-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation