Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychological Science Accelerator: A Promising Resource for Clinical Psychological Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology

Abstract

The Psychological Science Accelerator (PSA) is an international collaborative network of psychological scientists that facilitates rigorous and generalizable research. In this chapter, we describe how the PSA can help clinical psychologists and clinical psychological science more broadly. We first describe the PSA and outline how individual clinical psychologists can use the PSA as a helpful resource in numerous capacities: leading or contributing to clinical research or research with clinical relevance, building collaborative relationships, obtaining experience and expertise, and learning about systems and tools, particularly those related to open science practices, that they can adapt to their own research. We then describe how the PSA supports rigor and transparency at each stage of the research process. Finally, we discuss the challenges of the PSA’s large, collaborative approach to research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adkins, M. C., Beribisky, N., Bonfield, S., & Farmus, L. (2020). Hierarchical modelling of facial perceptions: A secondary analysis of aggressiveness ratings [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5bv2p.

  • Bago, B., Aczel, B., Kekecs, Z., Protzko, J., Kovacs, M., Nagy, T., Hoekstra, R., Li, M., Musser, E. D., Arvanitis, A., Iones, M. T., Bayrak, F., Papadatou-Pastou, M., Belaus, A., Storage, D., Thomas, A. G., Buchanan, E. M., Becker, B., Baskin, E., … Dutra, N. B. (2020). Moral thinking across the world: Exploring the influence of personal force and intention in moral dilemma judgments (stage 1 registered report). Nature Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9uaqm

  • Batres, C. (2020). PSA001 secondary analysis: Examining the “attractiveness halo effect” [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/c7hf3.

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1976). Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies. International Journal of Psychology, 11(3), 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekar, S. P. (2020). The facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) and perceived dominance and trustworthiness: Moderating role of social identity cues (gender and race) and ecological factor (pathogen prevalence) [preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/64t9s

  • Chartier, C. R. (2017a, August 26). Building a CERN for psychological science. Christopher R. Chartier. https://christopherchartier.com/2017/08/26/building-a-cern-for-psychological-science/

  • Chartier, C. R. (2017b, October 12). On the verge of acceleration: The PSA has received its first submissions. Christopher R. Chartier. https://christopherchartier.com/2017/10/12/on-the-verge-of-acceleration-the-psa-has-received-its-first-submissions/

  • Chartier, C. R. (2020, October 28). News from the accelerator- October 2020. Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/2020/10/28/news-from-the-accelerator-october-2020/

  • Chen, S.-C., Szabelska, A., Chartier, C. R., Kekecs, Z., Lynott, D., Bernabeu, P., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Levitan, C., Werner, K. M., Wang, K., Milyavskaya, M., Musser, E. D., Papadatou-Pastou, M., Coles, N. A., Janssen, S., Özdoğru, A. A., Storage, D., Manley, H., … Schmidt, K. (2020). Investigating object orientation effects across 14 languages [preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t2pjv

  • Cheon, B. K., Melani, I., & Hong, Y. (2020). How USA-centric is psychology? An archival study of implicit assumptions of generalizability of findings to human nature based on origins of study samples. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 928–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620927269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, G., Wang, Z., Levy Paluck, E., Swanson, N., Birke, D., Miguel, E., & Littman, R. (2020). Open science practices are on the rise: The state of social science (3S) survey. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0hx0207r

  • Cristea, I. A., & Naudet, F. (2019). Increase value and reduce waste in research on psychological therapies. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 123, 103–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, G. C., & Lazarus, A. A. (2006). Clinical case studies are important in the science and practice of psychotherapy. In S. O. Lilienfeld & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), The Great Ideas of Clinical Science: 17 Principles that Every Mental Health Professional Should Understand (pp. 149–162). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/clinical-case-studies-important-science-practice-psychotherapy-gerald-davison-arnold-lazarus/10.4324/9780203942789-14

  • Dorison, C., Lerner, J. S., Heller, B. H., Rothman, A., Kawachi, I. I., Wang, K., Rees, V. W., Gill, B. P., Gibbs, N., & Coles, N. A. (2020). A global test of message framing on behavioural intentions, policy support, information seeking, and experienced anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/sevkf.

  • Durkee, P., & Ayers, J. D. (2020). Is facial width-to-height ratio reliably associated with social inferences? A large cross-national examination [preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tpngz

  • Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., Baranski, E., Bernstein, M. J., Bonfiglio, D. B. V., Boucher, L., Brown, E. R., Budiman, N. I., Cairo, A. H., Capaldi, C. A., Chartier, C. R., Chung, J. M., Cicero, D. C., Coleman, J. A., Conway, J. G., … Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli, D. (2010). “Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS One, 5(4), e10068. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J., & Heene, M. (2012). A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science’s aversion to the null. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 561–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them [preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hs7wm

  • Forscher, P. S., Aczel, B., Chartier, C. R., Musser, E. D., Horstmann, K. T., Grahe, J. E., Kekecs, Z., Corker, K. S., Sirota, M., Vaughn, L. A., Wichman, A. L., Papadatou-Pastou, M., Evans, T. R., Szecsi, P., Storage, D., Pfuhl, G., Borghi, J., Urry, H. L., Isager, P. M., … Flake, J. K. (2020). Psychological science accelerator data management bylaws [preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/buqyc

  • Forscher, P. S., Taylor, V. J., Cavagnaro, D., Lewis, N. A., Buchanan, E. M., Moshontz, H., Mark, A. Y., Appleby, S., Batres, C., Bennett-Day, B., Chopik, W. J., Damian, R. I., Ellis, C. E., Faas, C., Gaither, S., Green, D., Hall, B. F., Hinojosa, B. M., Howell, J. L., … Chartier, C. R. (2020). Stereotype threat in black college students across many operationalizations (stage 1 registered report). Nature Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6hju9

  • Hall, B. F., Wagge, J. R., Pfuhl, G., Stieger, S., Vergauwe, E., Ijzerman, H., Musser, E. D., Schmidt, K., Weissgerber, S. C., Buchanan, E. M., Chen, S.-C., Werner, K. M., Field, A. P., Meijer, E., Andreychik, M., Storage, D., Voracek, M., Tran, U. S., Hartanto, A., … Lewis, S. (2020). Registered replication report: Turri, Buckwalter, & Blouw (2015). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zeux9

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, N., & Hehman, E. (2020). Hester PSA001 preregistration preprint—Region- and language-level ICCs for judgments of faces [preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fz6kr

  • Hopwood, C. J., & Vazire, S. (2020). Reproducibility in clinical psychology. In A. G. C. Wright & M. N. Hallquist (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (1st ed., pp. 371–382). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316995808.035

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ijzerman, H., Lewis, N. A., Przybylski, A. K., Weinstein, N., DeBruine, L., Ritchie, S. J., Vazire, S., Forscher, P. S., Morey, R. D., Ivory, J. D., & Anvari, F. (2020). Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1092–1094. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00990-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Flake, J. K., Liuzza, M. T., Antfolk, J., Arinze, N. C., Ndukaihe, I. L. G., Bloxsom, N., Lewis, S., Foroni, F., Willis, M., Cubillas, C. P., Vadillo, M. A., Gilead, Michael, Simchon, A., Saribay, S. A., Owsley, N. C., Calvillo, D. P., Włodarczyk, A., … Coles, N. A. (in press). To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply? Nature Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/n26dy.

  • Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühberger, A., Fritz, A., & Scherndl, T. (2014). Publication bias in psychology: A diagnosis based on the correlation between effect size and sample size. PLoS One, 9(9), e105825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105825

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Legate, N., Nguyen, T.-V., Moller, A., Legault, L., Weinstein, N., & Psychological Science Accelerator. (2020). Effect of message framing on motivation to follow vs. defy social distancing guidelines during the COVID 19 pandemic. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.3014

  • Leong, F. T. L., & Kalibatseva, Z. (2013). Clinical research with culturally diverse populations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793549.013.0021

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mækelæ, M. J., Reggev, N., Dutra, N., Tamayo, R. M., Silva-Sobrinho, R. A., Klevjer, K., & Pfuhl, G. (2020). Perceived efficacy of COVID-19 restrictions, reactions and their impact on mental health during the early phase of the outbreak in six countries. Royal Society Open Science, 7(8), 200644. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200644

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Wood, A. R., & Oh, D. (2020). Population diversity is associated with trustworthiness impressions from faces [preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/sbvkz

  • Meyer, M. N. (2018). Practical tips for ethical data sharing. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., Ijzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., Grahe, J. E., Mccarthy, R. J., Musser, E. D., Antfolk, J., Castille, C. M., Evans, T. R., Fiedler, S., Flake, J. K., Forero, D. A., Janssen, S. M. J., Keene, J. R., Protzko, J., Aczel, B., … Chartier, C. R. (2018). The psychological science accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nagayama Hall, G. C. (2006). Diversity in clinical psychology. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13(3), 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00034.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J., & Simonsohn, U. (2018). Psychology’s renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nutu, D., Gentili, C., Naudet, F., & Cristea, I. A. (2019). Open science practices in clinical psychology journals: An audit study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(6), 510–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, D., & Todorov, A. (2020). Do regional gender and racial biases predict gender and racial biases in social face judgments? [preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/v7hpe

  • Onie, S. (2020). Redesign open science for asia, africa and latin america. Nature, 587(7832), 35–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03052-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, B., Ijzerman, H., & Forscher, P. S. (2020). PSA 2020-2021 study capacity report [preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/v9zma

  • Patel, V., & Sumathipala, A. (2001). International representation in psychiatric literature: Survey of six leading journals. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178(5), 406–409. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.178.5.406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premachandra, B., & Lewis, N. A. (2020). Do we report the information that is necessary to give psychology away? A scoping review of the psychological intervention literature 2000-2018 [preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nr8kh

  • Rad, M. S., Martingano, A. J., & Ginges, J. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11401–11405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, K. W., Smack, A. J., Herzhoff, K., & Tackett, J. L. (2019). An N-pact factor for clinical psychological research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(6), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reifman, A., & Grahe, J. E. (2016). Introduction to the special issue of emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 4(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815588022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk, J. K., Williams, A. J., Kilshaw, R. E., & Rhyner, K. T. (2019). Evaluating the evidential value of empirically supported psychological treatments (ESTs): A meta-scientific review. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(6), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheel, A. M., Schijen, M., & Lakens, D. (2020). An excess of positive results: Comparing the standard psychology literature with registered reports [preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/p6e9c

  • Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613514755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soderberg, C. K., Errington, T. M., Schiavone, S. R., Bottesini, J. G., Singleton Thorn, F., Vazire, S., Esterling, K., & Nosek, B. A. (2020). Research quality of registered reports compared to the traditional publishing model [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/7x9vy.

  • Suliman, S., van den Heuvel, L., Suryapranata, A., Bisson, J. I., & Seedat, S. (2019). Publication and non-publication of clinical trials in PTSD: An overview. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4(1), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tackett, J. L., Brandes, C. M., King, K. M., & Markon, K. E. (2019). Psychology’s replication crisis and clinical psychological science. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tackett, J. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Johnson, S. L., Krueger, R. F., Miller, J. D., Oltmanns, T. F., & Shrout, P. E. (2017). It’s time to broaden the replicability conversation: Thoughts for and from clinical psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 742–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617690042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tackett, J. L., & Miller, J. D. (2019). Introduction to the special section on increasing replicability, transparency, and openness in clinical psychology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(6), 487–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tajika, A., Ogawa, Y., Takeshima, N., Hayasaka, Y., & Furukawa, T. A. (2015). Replication and contradiction of highly cited research papers in psychiatry: 10-year follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry, 207(4), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.143701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagge, J. R., Brandt, M. J., Lazarevic, L. B., Legate, N., Christopherson, C., Wiggins, B., & Grahe, J. E. (2019). Publishing research with undergraduate students via replication work: The collaborative replications and education project. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00247

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Goldenberg, A., Dorison, C., Miller, J. K., Uusberg, A., Lerner, J. S., & Gross, J. (2020). A global test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic (stage 1 registered report). Nature Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m4gpq.

  • Washburn, A. N., Hanson, B. E., Motyl, M., Skitka, L. J., Yantis, C., Wong, K. M., Sun, J., Prims, J. P., Mueller, A. B., Melton, Z. J., & Carsel, T. S. (2018). Why do some psychology researchers resist adopting proposed reforms to research practices? A description of researchers’ rationales. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918757427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, S. Y., & Hehman, E. (2020). Variance and homogeneity of facial trait space across world regions [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d4zma

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, IN, USA

    Julie Beshears

  2. Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje, North Macedonia

    Biljana Gjoneska

  3. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, USA

    Kathleen Schmidt

  4. UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

    Gerit Pfuhl

  5. University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland

    Toni Saari

  6. Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA, USA

    William H. B. McAuliffe

  7. University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, IN, USA

    Crystal N. Steltenpohl

  8. Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Sandersan Onie

  9. Ashland University, Ashland, OH, USA

    Christopher R. Chartier

  10. Department of Psychology, University of Madison-Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

    Hannah Moshontz

Authors
  1. Julie Beshears
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Biljana Gjoneska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kathleen Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerit Pfuhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Toni Saari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. William H. B. McAuliffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Crystal N. Steltenpohl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sandersan Onie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Christopher R. Chartier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hannah Moshontz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA

    William O'Donohue

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA

    Akihiko Masuda

  3. Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Scott Lilienfeld

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beshears, J. et al. (2022). Psychological Science Accelerator: A Promising Resource for Clinical Psychological Science. In: O'Donohue, W., Masuda, A., Lilienfeld, S. (eds) Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation