Abstract
Seismic vulnerability is defined as the tendency of the structure to undergo structural or non-structural damage in case of any seismic event. In such cases, the buildings lose its ability to bear the sudden effects of seismic forces. In risk analysis of a building, the vulnerability assessment of a structure plays a vital role. Over the years various methods have evolved for assessing the seismic vulnerability of a structure. The assessment procedures may be empirical, semi empirical or analytical. The assessment output may be quantitative or qualitative in nature. Seismic vulnerability based on empirical method are evaluated with the help of post-earthquake damage data collected over the years and thereafter the structures are compared with the structural details and typology prior to seismic event. The damage data and statistics are recorded year after year around the globe after every seismic event. On the other hand, in analytical method, the seismic vulnerability can be assessed through deriving numerical model and also performing various types of static and dynamic analyses, mainly the nonlinear analyses. However, some of the said, methods are time consuming and computationally intensive, hence there are various alternative vulnerability assessment strategies proposed by various researchers, which are briefly described in this article. Also, the prerequisite of a suitable seismic vulnerability assessment procedure is discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashim, A., Rama Mohan, R.K., Dipendra, G., Hemchandra, C.: Seismic vulnerability and retrofitting scheme for low-to-medium rise reinforced concrete buildings in Nepal. J. Build. Eng. 21, 186–199 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.10.015
Antoniou, S., Pinho, R.: Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J. Earthq. Eng. 8(5), 643–661 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350504
Bernardini, A., Gori, R., Modena, C.: Application of coupled analytical models and experimental knowledge to seismic vulnerability analyses of masonry buildings. In: Koridze, A. (ed.) Engineering Damage Evaluation and Vulnerability Analysis of Building Structures Omega Scientific, Oxon (1990)
Benedetti, D., Petrini, V.: Sulla Vulnerabilità Di Edifici in Muratura: Proposta Di UnMetodo Di Valutazione. L’industriadelleCostruzioni 149(1), 66–74 (1984)
Calvi, G.M.: A displacement-based approach for vulnerability evaluation of classes of buildings. J. Earthq. Eng. 3(3), 411–438 (1999)
Calvi, G.M., et al.: Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methods for the past 30 years. ISET J. Earthquake Technol. 43(3), 75–104 (2006)
Coskun, O., Aldemir, A., Sahmaran, M.: Rapid screening method for the determination of seismic vulnerability assessment of RC building stocks. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 18(4), 1401–1416 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00751-9
D’Ayala, D., Speranza, E.: An integrated procedure for the assessment of seismic vulnerability of historic buildings. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, U.K., Paper No. 561 (2002)
Dilmaç, H.: Preliminary assessment approach to predict seismic vulnerability of existing low and mid-rise RC buildings. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 18, 1–33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00809-z
Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California Report ATC-13, ATC (1985), Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, U.S.A
Erdil, B., Ceylan, H.: A detailed comparison of preliminary seismic vulnerability assessment methods for RC buildings. Iranian J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civil Eng. 43(4), 711–725 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00234-6
JBDPA: Standard for Seismic Capacity Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Japanese Building Disaster Prevention Association, Ministry of Construction, Tokyo, Japan (1990)
Kappos, A.J., Pitilakis, K. And Stylianidis, K.C.: Cost-benefit analysis for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings in Thessaloniki, based on a hybrid method of vulnerability assessment. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Nice, France, vol. 1, pp. 406–413 (1995)
Kassem, M.M., Nazri, F.M., Farsangi, E.N.: Development of seismic vulnerability index methodology for reinforced concrete buildings based on nonlinear parametric analyses. MethodsX 6, 199 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.01.006
Kircher, C.A., Nassar, A.A., Kustu, O., Holmes, W.T.: Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation. Earthq. Spectra 13(4), 663–682 (1997)
Aguilar-Meléndez, A., et al.: A probabilistic approach for seismic risk assessment based on vulnerability functions. application to Barcelona. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 17(4), 1863–1890 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0516-4
Mosleh, A., Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., Costa, A., Arêde, A.: Seismic behaviour of RC building structures designed according to current codes. Structures 7, 1–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2016.04.001
Nanda, R.P., Majhi, D.P.: Rapid seismic vulnerability assessment of building stocks for developing countries. KSCE J. Civil Eng. 18(7), 2218–2226 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0050-0
Orsini, G.: A model for buildings’ vulnerability assessment using the parameterless scale of seismic intensity (PSI). Earthq. Spectra. 15(3), 463–483 (1999)
Panahi, M., Rezaie, F., Meshkani, S.A.: Seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in Tehran city based on AHP and GIS. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 14, 969–979 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-969-2014
Patil, V.S., Tande, S.N.: Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of brick masonry infill reinforced concrete building. Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 10, 263–274 (2018)
Park, Y.J., Ang, A.H.S.: Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 111(4), 722–739 (1985)
Priestley, M.J.N.: Myths and Fallacies in Earthquake Engineering, Revisited: The Mallet Milne Lecture, 2003. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy (2003)
Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards: A Handbook FEMA P-154/January 2015. Third Edition (2015)
Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards: A Handbook, Report ATC-21, ATC. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, U.S.A (1988)
Ricci, P., Domenico, M.D., Verderame, G.M.: Effects of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction in URM infills on the seismic performance of RC buildings designed to Eurocodes. J. Earthq. Eng. 26, 1595–1629 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1733137
Ricci, P., Del Gaudio, C., Verderame, G.M., Manfredim, G., Pollino, M., Borfecchia, F.: Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale based on different building stock data sources. In: Conference Paper, June 2014 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413609.104
Ródenas, J.L., Tomás, A., Garcia, A.S.: Advances in seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings applied to the experience of Lorca (Spain) 2011 earthquake. Int. J. Comp. Meth. Exp. Meas. 6(5), 887–898 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V6-N5-887-898
El-Betar, S.A.: Seismic vulnerability evaluation of existing R.C. buildings. Housing Build. Natl. Res. Center. (HBRC) J. 14, 189–197 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2016.09.002
Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Report ATC-40, ATC. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, U.S.A (1996)
Singhal, A., Kiremidjian, A.S.: Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 122(12), 1459–1467 (1996)
Singhal, A., Kiremidjian, A.S.: Bayesian updating of fragilities with application to RC frames. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 124(8), 922–929 (1998)
Spence, R., Coburn, A.W., Pomonis, A.: Correlation of ground motion with building damage: the definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale. In: Proceedings of the Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, vol. 1, pp. 551–556 (1992)
Vicente, R., Parodi, S., Lagomarsino, S., Varum, H., Da Silva, J.A.R., Mendes: Seismic vulnerability assessment, damage scenarios and loss estimation case study of the old City Centre of Coimbra, Portugal. In: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 12–17 October 2008, Beijing, China (2008)
Whitman, R.V., Reed, J.W. and Hong, S.T.: Earthquake damage probability matrices. In: Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, Italy, vol. 2, pp. 2531–2540 (1973)
Yakut, A.: Preliminary seismic performance assessment procedure for existing RC buildings. Eng. Struct. 26(10), 1447–1461 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Roy, N.S., Choudhury, S. (2022). Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A Review. In: Fonseca de Oliveira Correia, J.A., Choudhury, S., Dutta, S. (eds) Advances in Structural Mechanics and Applications. ASMA 2021. Structural Integrity, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04793-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04793-0_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04792-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04793-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)