Abstract
As humans, we show striking performance costs when attempting to complete more than a single task at a time. This is perhaps surprising given the inherent complexity and processing power of the human brain. In this chapter, we synthesise the in-roads that have been made into understanding the neural basis of multitasking costs and their practice-induced remediation. We propose a taxonomy of the theoretical traditions and empirical insights that have informed our understanding of why the brain struggles to multitask. Cognitive architecture approaches pose cognitive operations that may give rise to multitasking costs and seek neural correlates of those operations. System architecture approaches leverage insights regarding the function of brain circuits to propose why such systems may struggle to multitask. Last, neural architecture approaches use principles of neural computation to build networks that are constrained in multitasking performance as a consequence of their computational features. These approaches converge to demonstrate the importance of prefrontal cortical and subcortical interactions in the production of multitasking costs and, surprisingly, demonstrate the computational advantages afforded by multitasking costs. In the final sections, we outline a new framework for characterising multitasking costs, demonstrating that the brain may leverage shared information between tasks to gain representational efficiency, which occurs at the expense of multitasking performance. Practice serves to attenuate shared environmental information, thereby separating representations and facilitating multitasking performance.
Visualisations by K.G. Garner & David Lloyd.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anguera, J. A., Boccanfuso, J., Rintoul, J. L., Al-Hashimi, O., Faraji, F., Janowich, J., Kong, E., Larraburo, Y., Rolle, C., Johnston, E., & Gazzaley, A. (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 501(7465), 97–101.
Ashby, F. G., Turner, B. O., & Horvitz, J. C. (2010). Cortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(5), 208–215.
Bornstein, A. M., & Daw, N. D. (2011). Multiplicity of control in the basal ganglia: computational roles of striatal subregions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 21(3), 374–380.
Bouton, M. E. (2004). Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learning & Memory, 11(5), 485–494.
Bratzke, D., & Janczyk, M. (2020). Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance. Psychological Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01282-3
Bratzke, D., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2009). The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1413–1426.
Brisson, B., & Bourassa, M. È. (2014). Masking of a first target in the attentional blink attenuates the P 3 to the first target and delays the P 3 to the second target. Psychophysiology. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/psyp.12204
Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2008). The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57(3), 153–178.
Caballero, J. A., Humphries, M. D., & Gurney, K. N. (2018). A probabilistic, distributed, recursive mechanism for decision-making in the brain. PLoS Computational Biology, 14(4), e1006033.
Camilleri, J. A., Müller, V. I., Fox, P., Laird, A. R., Hoffstaedter, F., Kalenscher, T., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2018). Definition and characterization of an extended multiple-demand network. NeuroImage, 165, 138–147.
Carpenter, G. A. (2001). Neural-network models of learning and memory: leading questions and an emerging framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(3), 114–118.
Caruana, R. (1997). Multitask Learning. Machine Learning, 28(1), 41–75.
Cho, K. W., Altarriba, J., & Popiel, M. (2015). Mental juggling: when does multitasking impair reading comprehension? The Journal of General Psychology, 142(2), 90–105.
Collette, F., Olivier, L., Van der Linden, M., Laureys, S., Delfiore, G., Luxen, A., & Salmon, E. (2005). Involvement of both prefrontal and inferior parietal cortex in dual-task performance. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(2), 237–251.
Cox, J., & Witten, I. B. (2019). Striatal circuits for reward learning and decision-making. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0189-2
Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems. MIT Press.
Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., & Changeux, J. P. (1998). A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(24), 14529–14534.
Dreher, J.-C., & Grafman, J. (2003). Dissociating the roles of the rostral anterior cingulate and the lateral prefrontal cortices in performing two tasks simultaneously or successively. Cerebral Cortex, 13(4), 329–339.
Duncan, J. (2010). The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 172–179.
Duncan, J. (2013). The structure of cognition: attentional episodes in mind and brain. Neuron, 80(1), 35–50.
Dux, P. E., Ivanoff, J., Asplund, C. L., & Marois, R. (2006). Isolation of a central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved FMRI. Neuron, 52(6), 1109–1120.
Dux, P. E., Tombu, M. N., Harrison, S., Rogers, B. P., Tong, F., & Marois, R. (2009). Training improves multitasking performance by increasing the speed of information processing in human prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 63(1), 127–138.
Erickson, K. I., Colcombe, S. J., Wadhwa, R., Bherer, L., Peterson, M. S., Scalf, P. E., & Kramer, A. F. (2005). Neural correlates of dual-task performance after minimizing task-preparation. NeuroImage, 28(4), 967–979.
Feng, S. F., Schwemmer, M., Gershman, S. J., & Cohen, J. D. (2014). Multitasking versus multiplexing: Toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control-demanding behaviors. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(1), 129–146.
Filmer, H. L., Lyons, M., Mattingley, J. B., & Dux, P. E. (2017a). Anodal tDCS applied during multitasking training leads to transferable performance gains. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 12988.
Filmer, H. L., Mattingley, J. B., Marois, R., & Dux, P. E. (2013). Disrupting prefrontal cortex prevents performance gains from sensory-motor training. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 33(47), 18654–18660.
Filmer, H. L., Varghese, E., Hawkins, G. E., Mattingley, J. B., & Dux, P. E. (2017b). Improvements in Attention and Decision-Making Following Combined Behavioral Training and Brain Stimulation. Cerebral Cortex, 27(7), 3675–3682.
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003). Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1273–1302.
Garner, K., Garrido, M. I., & Dux, P. E. (2020). Cognitive capacity limits are remediated by practice-induced plasticity between the putamen and pre-supplementary motor area. bioRxiv. 564450. https://doi.org/10.1101/564450
Garner, K. G., & Dux, P. E. (2015). Training conquers multitasking costs by dividing task representations in the frontoparietal-subcortical system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(46), 14372–14377.
Garner, K. G., Tombu, M. N., & Dux, P. E. (2014). The influence of training on the attentional blink and psychological refractory period. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76(4), 979–999.
Gershman, S. J., Blei, D. M., & Niv, Y. (2010). Context, learning, and extinction. Psychological Review, 117(1), 197–209.
Graybiel, A. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2015). The striatum: where skills and habits meet. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 7(8), a021691.
Gurney, K., Prescott, T. J., & Redgrave, P. (2001). A computational model of action selection in the basal ganglia. I. A new functional anatomy. Biological Cybernetics, 84(6), 401–410.
Haxby, J. V. (2012). Multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI: the early beginnings. NeuroImage, 62(2), 852–855.
Hazeltine, E., & Ruthruff, E. (2006). Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck. Psychological Research, 70(6), 504–513.
Hazeltine, E., Ruthruff, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006). The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology, 52(4), 291–345.
Hélie, S., Ell, S. W., & Ashby, F. G. (2015). Learning robust cortico-cortical associations with the basal ganglia: an integrative review. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 64, 123–135.
Herculano-Houzel, S. (2009). The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 31.
Hesselmann, G., Flandin, G., & Dehaene, S. (2011). Probing the cortical network underlying the psychological refractory period: a combined EEG-fMRI study. NeuroImage, 56(3), 1608–1621.
Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4(1), 11–26.
Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2010). Crossmodal action selection: evidence from dual-task compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 38(4), 493–501.
Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45(3), 188–196.
Jackson, J. B., & Woolgar, A. (2018). Adaptive coding in the human brain: Distinct object features are encoded by overlapping voxels in frontoparietal cortex. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 108, 25–34.
Jackson, J., Rich, A. N., Williams, M. A., & Woolgar, A. (2017). Feature-selective Attention in Frontoparietal Cortex: Multivoxel Codes Adjust to Prioritize Task-relevant Information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(2), 310–321.
Jahanshahi, M., Obeso, I., Rothwell, J. C., & Obeso, J. A. (2015). A fronto-striato-subthalamic-pallidal network for goal-directed and habitual inhibition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 16(12), 719–732.
Janczyk, M., Renas, S., & Durst, M. (2018). Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 44(2), 261–276.
Jiang, Y., Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Functional magnetic resonance imaging provides new constraints on theories of the psychological refractory period. Psychological Science, 15(6), 390–396.
Joel, D., Niv, Y., & Ruppin, E. (2002). Actor-critic models of the basal ganglia: new anatomical and computational perspectives. Neural Networks: The Official Journal of the International Neural Network Society, 15(4-6), 535–547.
Johnston, J. C., & McCann, R. S. (2006). On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 694–719.
Klapp, S. T., Maslovat, D., & Jagacinski, R. J. (2019). The bottleneck of the psychological refractory period effect involves timing of response initiation rather than response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(1), 29–47.
Ko, Y.-T., & Miller, J. (2014). Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task. Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 30–37.
Lebedev, M. A., Messinger, A., Kralik, J. D., & Wise, S. P. (2004). Representation of attended versus remembered locations in prefrontal cortex. PLoS Biology, 2(11), e365.
Levy, J., & Pashler, H. (2008). Task prioritisation in multitasking during driving: opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual-task slowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(4), 507–525.
Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108(2), 393–434.
Logothetis, N. K. (2008). What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature, 453(7197), 869–878.
Maquestiaux, F., Hartley, A. A., & Bertsch, J. (2004). Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect? Psychology and Aging, 19(4), 649–667.
Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., & Bherer, L. (2008). Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource … Memory. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/MC.36.7.1262
Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., Hartley, A., & Bherer, L. (2010). Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age. Psychology and Aging, 25(1), 177–192.
Marois, R., & Ivanoff, J. (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 296–305.
Marois, R., Larson, J. M., Chun, M. M., & Shima, D. (2006). Response-specific sources of dual-task interference in human pre-motor cortex. Psychological Research, 70(6), 436–447.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/_id=ecaade2013/Show?fafa
Marti, S., King, J.-R., & Dehaene, S. (2015). Time-Resolved Decoding of Two Processing Chains during Dual-Task Interference. Neuron, 88(6), 1297–1307.
Marti, S., Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2883–2898.
Mashour, G. A., Roelfsema, P., Changeux, J.-P., & Dehaene, S. (2020). Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis. Neuron, 105(5), 776–798.
Messinger, A., Lebedev, M. A., Kralik, J. D., & Wise, S. P. (2009). Multitasking of attention and memory functions in the primate prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 29(17), 5640–5653.
Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104(1), 3–65.
Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104(4), 749–791.
Meyers, E. M., Freedman, D. J., Kreiman, G., Miller, E. K., & Poggio, T. (2008). Dynamic population coding of category information in inferior temporal and prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 100(3), 1407–1419.
Miller, J., & Alderton, M. (2006). Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 149–165.
Musslick, S., Saxe, A., Özcimder, K., Dey, B., Henselman, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2017). Multitasking Capability Versus Learning Efficiency in Neural Network Architectures. CogSci, 829–834.
Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44(3), 193–251.
Nichols, T. E. (2012). Multiple testing corrections, nonparametric methods, and random field theory. NeuroImage, 62(2), 811–815.
Olton, D. S., Wenk, G. L., Church, R. M., & Meck, W. H. (1988). Attention and the frontal cortex as examined by simultaneous temporal processing. Neuropsychologia, 26(2), 307–318.
Paliwal, M., & Kumar, U. A. (2009). Neural networks and statistical techniques: A review of applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 2–17.
Pang, K. C., Yoder, R. M., & Olton, D. S. (2001). Neurons in the lateral agranular frontal cortex have divided attention correlates in a simultaneous temporal processing task. Neuroscience, 103(3), 615–628.
Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 10(3), 358–377.
Pashler, H. (1990). Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 826–842.
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244.
Pashler, H., Jolicœur, P., Dell’Acqua, R., Crebolder, J., Goschke, T., De Jong, R., Meiran, N., Ivry, R. B., & Hazeltine, E. (2000). Task switching and multitask performance. In S. Monsell (Ed.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII, (Vol. 779, pp. 275–423). The MIT Press, xvi.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849–860.
Redish, A. D., Jensen, S., Johnson, A., & Kurth-Nelson, Z. (2007). Reconciling reinforcement learning models with behavioral extinction and renewal: implications for addiction, relapse, and problem gambling. Psychological Review, 114(3), 784–805.
Roelfsema, P. R., Lamme, V. A. F., & Spekreijse, H. (2000). The implementation of visual routines. Vision Research, 40(10), 1385–1411.
Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., Van Selst, M., Whitsell, S., & Remington, R. (2003). Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 280–289.
Ruthruff, E., Hazeltine, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006a). What causes residual dual-task interference after practice? Psychological Research, 70(6), 494–503.
Ruthruff, E., Van Selst, M., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. (2006b). How does practice reduce dual-task interference: integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? Psychological Research, 70(2), 125–142.
Sacerdoti, E. D. (1974). Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces. Artificial Intelligence, 5(2), 115–135.
Sagiv, Y., Musslick, S., Niv, Y., & Cohen, J. D. (2018). Efficiency of learning vs. processing: Towards a normative theory of multitasking. CogSci. http://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2018/papers/0200/0200.pdf
Salvucci, D. D., & Taatgen, N. A. (2008). Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115(1), 101–130.
Schmitz, T. W., & Duncan, J. (2018). Normalization and the Cholinergic Microcircuit: A Unified Basis for Attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(5), 422–437.
Schubert, T., & Szameitat, A. J. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 733–746.
Serences, J. T., & Saproo, S. (2012). Computational advances towards linking BOLD and behavior. Neuropsychologia, 50(4), 435–446.
Sergent, C., Baillet, S., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nature Neuroscience, 8(10), 1391–1400.
Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Brain mechanisms of serial and parallel processing during dual-task performance. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 28(30), 7585–7598.
Smith, K. S., & Graybiel, A. M. (2013). A dual operator view of habitual behavior reflecting cortical and striatal dynamics. Neuron, 79(2), 361–374.
Stelzel, C., Kraft, A., Brandt, S. A., & Schubert, T. (2008). Dissociable neural effects of task order control and task set maintenance during dual-task processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 613–628.
Stelzel, C., Schumacher, E. H., Schubert, T., & D’Esposito, M. (2006). The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study. Psychological Research, 70(6), 514–525.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30(0), 276–315.
Stokes, M. G., Kusunoki, M., Sigala, N., Nili, H., Gaffan, D., & Duncan, J. (2013). Dynamic coding for cognitive control in prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 78(2), 364–375.
Strobach, T. (2019). The dual-task practice advantage: Empirical evidence and cognitive mechanisms. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01619-4
Strobach, T., Frensch, P., Müller, H. J., & Schubert, T. (2012a). Testing the limits of optimizing dual-task performance in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 39.
Strobach, T., Frensch, P., Müller, H., & Schubert, T. (2012b). Age- and practice-related influences on dual-task costs and compensation mechanisms under optimal conditions of dual-task performance. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 19(1-2), 222–247.
Strobach, T., Schütz, A., & Schubert, T. (2015). On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 403.
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press.
Szameitat, A. J., Lepsien, J., von Cramon, D. Y., Sterr, A., & Schubert, T. (2006). Task-order coordination in dual-task performance and the lateral prefrontal cortex: an event-related fMRI study. Psychological Research, 70(6), 541–552.
Szameitat, A. J., Schubert, T., & Müller, H. J. (2011). How to test for dual-task-specific effects in brain imaging studies – an evaluation of potential analysis methods. NeuroImage, 54(3), 1765–1773.
Szameitat, A. J., Schubert, T., Müller, K., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Localization of executive functions in dual-task performance with fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1184–1199.
Tamber-Rosenau, B. J., Dux, P. E., Tombu, M. N., Asplund, C. L., & Marois, R. (2013). Amodal processing in human prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 33(28), 11573–11587.
Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1931-04368-001
Tepper, J. M., & Plenz, D. (2006). Striatal Cell Types and Their Interaction. Global Brain Function, 127.
Thoma, P., Koch, B., Heyder, K., Schwarz, M., & Daum, I. (2008). Subcortical contributions to multitasking and response inhibition. Behavioural Brain Research, 194(2), 214–222.
Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 3–18.
Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2008). Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: models and contamination effects. Cognitive Psychology, 57(2), 75–121.
Watanabe, K., & Funahashi, S. (2014). Neural mechanisms of dual-task interference and cognitive capacity limitation in the prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 17(4), 601–611.
Watanabe, K., & Funahashi, S. (2018). Toward an understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying dual-task performance: Contribution of comparative approaches using animal models. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 84, 12–28.
Welford, A. T. (1952). The “Psychological Refractory Period” and the timing of high-speed performance – a review and a theory. The British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 43(1), 2–19.
Welford, A. T. (1959). Evidence of a single-channel decision mechanism limiting performance in a serial reaction task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11(4), 193–210.
Welford, A. T. (1967). Single-channel operation in the brain. Acta Psychologica, 27, 5–22.
Woolgar, A., Hampshire, A., Thompson, R., & Duncan, J. (2011). Adaptive coding of task-relevant information in human frontoparietal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 31(41), 14592–14599.
Woolgar, A., Jackson, J., & Duncan, J. (2016). Coding of Visual, Auditory, Rule, and Response Information in the Brain: 10 Years of Multivoxel Pattern Analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(10), 1433–1454.
Yildiz, A., & Beste, C. (2015). Parallel and serial processing in dual-tasking differentially involves mechanisms in the striatum and the lateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Structure & Function, 220(6), 3131–3142.
Yin, H. H., & Knowlton, B. J. (2006). The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 7(6), 464–476.
Yosinski, J., Clune, J., Bengio, Y., & Lipson, H. (2014). How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. D. Lawrence, & K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (pp. 3320–3328). Curran Associates, Inc.
Zylberberg, A., Fernández Slezak, D., Roelfsema, P. R., Dehaene, S., & Sigman, M. (2010). The brain’s router: a cortical network model of serial processing in the primate brain. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(4), e1000765.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garner, K.G., Dux, P.E. (2022). The Neural Basis of Simultaneous Multitasking. In: Kiesel, A., Johannsen, L., Koch, I., Müller, H. (eds) Handbook of Human Multitasking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04760-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04760-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04759-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04760-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)