Abstract
(Norris and Sawyer, Duo-ethnography: Dialogic Methods for Social, Health, and Educational Research, Left Coast Press, 2012) presented duo-ethnography to the qualitative research field as a new dialogical research method for understanding complex phenomena and topics of interest from multiple perspectives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Additional Readings
Ceglowski, D., & Makovsky, T. (2012). Duoethnography with children. Ethnography and Education, 7(3), 283–295.
Lowe, R. J., & Kiczkowiak, M. (2016). Native-speakerism and the complexity of personal experience: A duo-ethnographic study. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1264171.
Sawyer, R. D., & Norris, J. N. (2012). Duoethnography: Understanding qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
Sameshima, P. (2013). Duo-ethnography. Understanding qualitative research & Duo-ethnography: Promoting personal and societal change within dialogic self-study. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum studies, 11(1), 174–190.
Wagaman, M. A., & Sanchez, I. (2017). Looking through the magnifying glass: A duo-ethnographic approach to understanding the value and process of participatory action research with LGBTQ youth. Qualitative Social Work, 16(1), 78–95.
Online Resources
A duoethnographic exploration of persistent technological failures in synchronous online education: https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3039/4270
University of Auckland Research Repository, Research Space: https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/2292/35776/Unearthing%20Truths%20accepted%20versionwithcoversheet.pdf?sequence=39
Duo-ethnography Project and Presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2frRkZS1xkA
References
Breault, R. A. (2016). Emerging issues in duo-ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(6), 777–794.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Franco, S. (2016). A doctoral seminar in qualitative research methods: Lessons learned. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 323–339.
Gélinas-Proulx, A., & Shields, C. M. (forthcoming). Leading for equity and social justice: Systemic transformation in Canadian education. University of Toronto Press.
Norris, J., & Sawyer, R. D. (2012). Toward a dialogic methodology. In J. Norris, R. D. Sawyer, & D. Lund (Eds.), Duo-ethnography: Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research (pp. 9–39). Left Coast Press.
Pinar, W. F. (1994). The method of “currere” (1975): Counterpoints. Journal of Politics & Sexuality, 2, 19–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirk, J., Osiname, A. (2023). Duo-ethnographic Methodology. In: Okoko, J.M., Tunison, S., Walker, K.D. (eds) Varieties of Qualitative Research Methods. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04396-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04394-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)