Abstract
Sub-Saharan African countries were categorized with regard to the state of the enabling environment for agricultural biotechnology in the crop and livestock sectors. This included consideration of public awareness, participation and acceptance; existence of a national biosafety framework; public policy and political goodwill; and the financial and investment environment. South Africa was the only country whose enabling environment was ranked as being ‘very strong’ for both crops and livestock, while Kenya and Nigeria were in the ‘strong’ enabling environment category for both crops and livestock. Sudan and Ethiopia were in the ‘strong’ category for crops but ‘medium’ category for livestock. Botswana, Ghana, Malawi, Mali, Namibia, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe were in ‘medium’ category for both crops and livestock. Malawi was ‘medium’ for crops but ‘weak’ for livestock. The remaining countries fell in ‘weak’ and/or ‘very weak’ for both crops and livestock. Key elements of the enabling environment were driven by actions in the crop sector, especially the pull factor with regard to creating conditions for the use of genetically modified crops. All but two countries, Equatorial Guinea and South Sudan, have ratified or complied with accession requirements for biosafety regulatory systems specified under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Bt maize refers to genetically engineered maize varieties that produce crystal (Cry) proteins or toxins derived from the soil bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis.
- 2.
References
Beintema N, Stads GJ (2014) Is Africa investing enough? In IFPRI 2013 global food policy report. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC
CBD (2000) Cartagena protocol on biosafety to the convention on biological diversity: text and annexes. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Available via CBD: https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cartagena-protocol-en.pdf Accessed 30 June 2021
CBD (2013) Biosafety clearing house. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Available via CBD: https://bch.cbd.int/protocol/gefprojects.shtml. Accessed 30 June 2021
Chambers JA et al (2014) GM agricultural technologies for Africa: a state of affairs. Report of a study commissioned by the African Development Bank. IFPRI and AfDB, Washington and Abidjan
FAO (2021) Global partnership initiative for plant breeding capacity building. Available via FAO. www.fao.org/in-action/plant-breeding/background/zh/. Accessed 30 June 2021
GALVmed (2015) Review of requirements and processes for veterinary products in selected African and Asian countries. GALVmed, Edinburgh. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5aa67844e5274a3e391e38bf/58_Vaccine_registration_report_final_draft.pdf. Accessed 7 October 2021
GCARD (Global Conference on Agricultural Research for Development) (2010) Benefitting the poor through public-private partnerships for innovation and action. Background paper for the global conference on agricultural research for development. Montpellier, March 28–30
Godfrey RN (2013) Case studies of African agricultural biotechnology regulation: Precautionary and harmonized policy-making in the wake of the cartagena protocol and the AU model law. Loy LA Int’l & Comp L Rev, 35, p 409. Available at https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol35/iss3/3
Gordh G, McKirdy S (2014) The handbook of plant biosecurity: principles and practices for the identification, containment and control of organisms that threaten agriculture and the environment globally. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7365-3
IFPRI (2014) Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI). IFPRI, Washington. Available at https://asti.cgiar.org/publications/overview-publications. Accessed 1 July 2021
Karembu M, Nguthi F, Ismail H (2009) Biotech crops in Africa: the final frontier. ISAAA AfriCenter, Nairobi
Karembu M, Wafula D, Waithaka M, Belay G (2010) Status of biotechnology policies and biosafety legislation in the COMESA Region. ISAAA AfriCenter, Nairobi
Kochhar HPS, Gifford GA, Kahn S (2005) Regulatory and biosafety issues in relation to transgenic animals in food and agriculture, feeds containing genetically modified organisms (GMO) and veterinary biologics. In: Makkar HP, Viljoen GJ (eds) Applications of gene-based technologies for improving animal production and health in developing countries. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 479–498
Kuhlmann K (2015) Harmonizing regional seed regulations in sub-Saharan Africa: a comparative assessment. Written for the Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture. Available via Syngenta. https://www.syngentafoundation.org/sites/g/files/zhg576/f/seedpolicy_new_africa_regulation_comparative_analysis_september_2015.pdf
Land O’Lakes International Development (2015) Public-Private Partnership for Artificial Insemination Delivery (PAID) 2015–2020. Available via Land O’Lakes International Development. https://www.landolakes.org/Where-We-Work/Africa/Tanzania/Public-Private-Partnership-for-Artificial-Insemina. Accessed 1 July 2021
Makinde D, Mumba L, Ambali A (2009) Status of biotechnology in Africa: challenges and opportunities. Asian Biotechnol Dev Rev 11(3):1–10
Mink SD (2016) Findings across agricultural expenditure reviews in African countries. IFPRI discussion paper 01522. IFPRI, Washington, DC. Available at https://media.africaportal.org/documents/130490.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2021
MLD (2006) National livestock policy. The United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Livestock Development. Dar-es-salaam. Available at https://www.tnrf.org/files/E-INFO_National_Livetock_Policy_Final_as_per_Cabinet_Dec-2006.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2021
MLFD (2015) Tanzania livestock modernization initiative, Dar-es-salaam: The United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries Development. Available at http://livestocklivelihoodsandhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Tanzania_Livestock_Modernization_Initiative_July_2015.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2021
Mugabe J (2002) Biotechnology in sub-Saharan Africa: Towards a policy research agenda. ATPS special series paper 3. Africa Technology Policy Studies Network, Nairobi
Muraguri L (2010) Unplugged! An analysis of agricultural biotechnology PPPs in Kenya. J Int Dev 22:289–307
Nin-Pratt A (2016) Comparing apples to apples: a new indicator of research and development investment intensity in agriculture (September 23, 2016). IFPRI Discussion Paper 1559. Available via SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2845425. Accessed 1 July 2021
Olembo N, M’mboyi F, Oyugi K et al (2010) Status of crop biotechnology in sub-Saharan Africa. African Biotechnology Stakeholders Forum, Nairobi
Pray CE, Fuglie KO, Johnson DK (2007) Private agricultural research. In: Evenson R, Pingali P (eds) Handbook of agricultural economics, vol 3. Elsevier, London, pp 2605–2640
Ruttan VW (2000) Technology, growth, and development: an induced innovation perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Shapiro BI, Gebru G, Desta S, Negassa A, Negussie K, Aboset G, Mechal H (2015) Ethiopia livestock master plan. Roadmaps for growth and transformation. A contribution to the growth and transformation plan II (2015-2020). Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock Resources Development Sector, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
UNEP (2000) Initial strategy for assisting countries to prepare for entry into force of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. In: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi
UNEP (2006) Building biosafety capacity: the role of UNEP and the biosafety unit. UNEP-GEF biosafety unit, Geneva. Available at https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/10000. Accessed 30 June 2021
UNEP (2017) National biosafety framework. Available via United Nations Environment Programme, Environment for Development. http://staging.unep.org/biosafety/National%20Biosafety%20frameworks.aspx. Accessed 30 June 2021
Wafula D, Waithaka M, Komen J, Karembu M (2012) Biosafety legislation and biotechnology development gains momentum in Africa. GM Crops Food 3:72–77
World Bank (2016) News: Cameroon 100 million to boost livestock sector for improved productivity and climate change resilience. Available via World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2016/10/27/cameroon-100-million-to-boost-livestock-sector-for-improved-productivity-and-climate-change-resilience. Accessed 30 June 2021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rege, J.E.O., Kiambi, D., Ochieng, J.W. (2022). The State of the Enabling Environment for Agricultural Biotechnology Applications in Crop and Livestock Sectors. In: Rege, J.E.O., Sones, K. (eds) Agricultural Biotechnology in Sub-Saharan Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04349-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04349-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04348-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04349-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)